You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Hysterectomy Controversies: Ovarian and Cervical Preservation

JACOBY, VANESSA L. MD, MAS

Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000011
Hysterectomy 2014: Indications and Techniques
Abstract

The decision to retain or remove the ovaries and cervix at the time of hysterectomy is complex and controversial. We present a summary of the current literature on the risks and benefits of elective oophorectomy and subtotal hysterectomy to inform surgical decision making. There are no randomized trials of oophorectomy compared with hysterectomy and ovarian preservation. Observational studies have conflicting evidence on long-term health outcomes following oophorectomy. In contrast, there are high-quality randomized trials of subtotal versus total hysterectomy; there is a decrease in some short-term surgical complications for women who undergo subtotal hysterectomy, but no differences in long-term outcomes.

Author Information

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California

The author declares that there is nothing to disclose.

Correspondence: Vanessa L. Jacoby, MD, MAS, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of California, 1635 Divisadero St Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94115. E-mail: jacobyv@obgyn.ucsf.edu

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.