You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Evidence-based Medicine and the Management of Menopause

LOBO, ROGERIO MD

Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181809376
Evidence-Based Approach to Menopause
Abstract

Although all clinicians should practice evidence-based medicine to assure the highest quality healthcare for our patients, there have been several misconceptions about what this really is, or what it should be. In some instances, the overreliance on a single randomized clinical trial (RCT), while ignoring a wealth of other literature resulted in erroneous conclusions. In many disease entities, results of RCTs and observational trials have rendered similar conclusions. Several weaknesses of RCTs and observational trials will be reviewed. In the area of menopausal medicine, a more in depth study of RCT data, including an appreciation of the type of population studied, the ages and risk factor status of the women participating, and the hormonal regimen tested, results in findings which are nearly identical to many observational trials. In the final analysis, no single study should be relied on solely to guide clinical practice. Understanding that there is a hierarchy of clinical data, the entire literature should be sought to provide the basis on which medicine is practiced.

Author Information

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Correspondence: Rogerio Lobo, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: RAL35@columbia.edu

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.