Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2007 - Volume 50 - Issue 2 > Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence—Midurethral Slings:...
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804a840c
Current Controversies in Gynecology

Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence—Midurethral Slings: Top-down, Bottom-up, “Outside-in,” or “Inside-out”


Collapse Box


Two randomized trials have reported no differences in efficacy between suprapubic arc and tension-free vaginal tape at 2 years. There are no long-term studies comparing the inside-out and outside-in transobturator (TOT) approach, although short-term data show no difference in cure rates or complications. The short-term efficacy of TOT midurethral slings is comparable with the retropubic slings; however, preliminary evidence suggests that TOT slings may have a lower success rate compared with retropubic slings for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. The risk of bladder injury may be the least with the “inside-out” approach, whereas retropubic techniques have a higher risk of cystotomy as compared with the TOT approach. Four randomized controlled trials comparing the retropubic and TOT approaches show no differences in rate of de novo urgency, retention, frequency, nocturia, or incomplete voiding.

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.