You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Effect of Lens Care Systems on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Hydrophobicity

Lira, Madalena Ph.D.; Silva, Rita M.Sc.

Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice:
doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000247
Article
Abstract

Purpose: To analyze changes in wettability of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) when preserved in different lens care systems.

Methods: In this research, four silicone hydrogel CLs (senofilcon A, balafilcon A, comfilcon A, and lotrafilcon B) and one conventional CL (etafilcon A) and appropriate lens care solutions (ReNu MultiPlus, Biotrue, OPTI-FREE PureMoist, and AOSept Plus) were used. Lenses were immersed in each lens care system for 12 hr and then CL hydrophobicity was determined through water contact angle (CA) measurements using the OCA 20 instrument (DataPhysics).

Results: Mean CA values obtained when CLs were removed from blisters (baseline value) were lower for etafilcon A (49.6°±3.0°) and comfilcon A (48.0°±2.8°) and higher for senofilcon A (78.9°±2.5°), lotrafilcon B (82.6°±1.7°), and balafilcon A (91.5°±0.7°). Depending on CL and lens care combination, it was detected a statistically significant reduction by 70% of the 20 combinations studied and any significant increase in the CA. When compared to baseline values, CA varied between etafilcon A: 2° and 11°, comfilcon A: 1° and 7°, senofilcon A: 2° and 28°, lotrafilcon B: 14° and 31°, and balafilcon A: 18° and 29°. Comfilcon A was the most stable lens material presenting only one significant decrease in CA.

Conclusions: This study reveals the existence of interactions between CL material and lens solutions that can play an important role in CL surface wettability. The major changes were obtained in lenses with higher baseline CA, which showed significant changes with each of the solutions. These differences can be positive, because in almost all of the combinations, the lenses became more wettable.

Author Information

Centre of Physics (CFUM), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Address correspondence to Madalena Lira, Ph.D., Department of Physics, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; e-mail: mlira@fisica.uminho.pt

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Accepted December 21, 2015

© 2017 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.