Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Omafilcon A (Proclear) Soft Contact Lenses in a Dry Eye Population.

Lemp, Michael A. MD; Caffery, Barbara OD, FAAO; Lebow, Kenneth OD, FAAO; Lembach, Richard MD; Park, Juliana MD; Foulks, Gary MD; Hall, Brenda BSc, PhD; Bowers, Roderick PhD; McGarvey, Shirley BS, MBA; Young, Graeme BSc, MPhil, FCOptom, DCLP, FAAO
CLAO Journal: January 1999

Purpose: We conducted a 3-month, randomized, comparative cross-over study to evaluate the clinical performance of lenses manufactured from omafilcon A on subjects with signs and symptoms of dry eye. The subjects' own daily wear soft lenses were used as controls.

Methods: Seventy-six subjects with objective evidence of dry eye, as defined in the NEI/Industry Workshop Report 1995, were fit with either the omafilcon A lenses (Proclear) or new control lenses. Subjects wore the lenses for 6 weeks and then crossed over to bilateral wear of the other lenses for an additional 6 weeks. During each part of the study, we examined subjects at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 weeks. Signs and symptoms of dry eye were evaluated, and on-eye dehydration of the lens was assessed.

Results: When the subjects were wearing the omafilcon A lenses, there was a statistically significant improvement in a number of subjective parameters including comfort, dryness, frequency of eye irritation, and frequency of burning. We found significantly less on-eye dehydration of the lens and fluorescein corneal staining with the omafilcon A lenses.

Conclusions: This study indicated that the daily wear of omafilcon A lenses provided better comfort, fewer symptoms, less on-eye dehydration, and less fluorescein corneal staining than other soft daily wear contact lenses in subjects with mild to moderate dry eye.

(C) 1999 The Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.