Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2001 - Volume 11 - Issue 1 > Neuropsychological Test Performance Prior To and Following S...
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine:
Clinical Investigations

Neuropsychological Test Performance Prior To and Following Sports-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Echemendia, Ruben J. PhD; Putukian, Margot MD; Mackin, R. Scott MS; Julian, Laura MS; Shoss, Naomi

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Received June 8, 2000; accepted October 27, 2000.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ruben J. Echemendia, PhD, Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 314 Bruce V. Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A. E-mail: RJE2@PSU.EDU

This research was funded in part through a grant from the Graduate Research Office, College of the Liberal Arts, The Pennsylvania State University, and in part through a grant from The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To examine the utility of neuropsychological tests in assessing college athletes prior to and following a sports-related mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI).

Design: A prospective study of college athletes who sustained mTBI while engaged in sport. Preinjury baseline neuropsychological test data were obtained for athletes at risk for mTBI. Following an mTBI, the athlete and his or her matched noninjured control were evaluated at 2 hours, 48 hours, 1 week, and 1 month postinjury.

Setting: Male and female athletes from a Division I college.

Participants: Male and female athletes from the football, men's ice hockey, men's and women's soccer, and men's and women's basketball teams at Penn State University. A total of 29 injured and 20 noninjured athletes participated in the study.

Interventions: Neuropsychological test batteries were administered at baseline and serially following mTBI.

Main Outcome Measures: Post-Concussion Symptom Checklist, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Stroop Color-Word Test, Trail Making Test, VIGIL/W, List Learning, Digit Span, Penn State Cancellation Test, and Controlled Oral Word Association.

Results: Neuropsychological test data yielded significant differences between injured athletes and controls at 2 hours and 48 hours following cerebral concussion; injured athletes performing significantly worse than controls. Injured athletes reported a significantly greater number of postconcussion symptoms 2 hours following injury but not at the 48-hour assessment. No multivariate group differences were found at 1 week, but univariate analyses suggested significant differences on a few measures. At 1 month postinjury, a statistically significant difference was found on one measure with injured athletes marginally outperforming controls.

Conclusions: Neuropsychological tests are useful in the detection of cognitive impairment following mTBI. The test data appear to be more effective than subjective report of symptoms in differentiating between injured and noninjured athletes at 48 hours postinjury. Although significant individual variability existed, most injured athletes recovered within 1 week of injury. A battery of tests, rather than any single test, is necessary to capture the variability that exists among injured athletes.

Of the roughly 500,000 hospital admissions due to traumatic brain injury in 1984, sports are listed as the cause in 3–10%. 1 Within the realm of sport, mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) are important, and account for 5.5% of all injuries at the high school level, 2 and 1.6–6.4% of all injuries at the college level. 3 The incidence of head injury at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) level is 0.06–0.55 per 1,000 athlete-exposures (game and practice). At the high school level, football is the sport with the highest incidence of mTBI, with a 15–20% risk for head injury per season, with 200,000 of these injuries occurring annually, and an average of 8 deaths per year. 4,5

The brain injuries that can occur in sport are varied in severity, from mild injuries with minor sequelae to more severe and life-threatening injuries. Cervical spine injuries and significant vascular injuries including subdural and epidural hematomas, hemorrhage, and contusions must be considered in the head-injured athlete. “Concussion,” or mTBI was defined as early as 1966 as “a clinical syndrome characterized by immediate and transient impairment of neurologic function secondary to mechanical forces.”6 mTBI represent common and significant concerns for health care professionals taking care of the athlete.

Many mTBI go undetected. Athletes will often continue playing despite symptoms due to a fear that they will be taken out of the game if they admit to symptoms, or an expectation that mild head injury is “part of the game.” McLatchie 7 found that 56% of 544 rugby athletes sustained at least one head injury associated with amnesia afterwards. Eleven percent of athletes had posttraumatic amnesia for more than 1 hour, and yet 35% of these athletes were not brought to a hospital for treatment. The consequences of these unreported injuries remain unclear, but several concerns about this issue have been explored.

There has been concern that repetitive concussions or return to play prior to complete resolution of a brain injury can have potentially detrimental effects on long-term cognitive function. The concern for “second impact syndrome,”8 where an athlete returns to play and sustains a second injury prior to complete resolution of a first insult with resultant serious sequelae including death, is of significant concern. There has also been concern that repetitive brain injury can lead to deficits in cognitive function or the “punch drunk syndrome,” which has been described in boxers. 9–11 These long-term sequelae of serious or repetitive brain injury can have impact on the function of the athlete outside of their sports participation.

There are several classification systems and return-to-play guidelines in the literature, 12–17 which health care professionals have used in taking care of the brain-injured athlete. However, very little prospective data exist, and many of the classification systems are of questionable utility since they are based on popular belief or practice rather than empirical evidence. 18 Several classification systems use loss of consciousness (LOC) as a predictor of severity, although recent data would seemingly question the assumption that LOC signals a more serious injury. 19

A variety of studies have been used to assess the brain-injured athlete, including plain radiographs, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and, more recently, near-infrared spectroscopy, 20,21 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), 22,23 magnetic resonance angiography, 24 and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. 25 The utilization of these tests often depends on the result of clinical examination. Although useful in detecting structural abnormalities and vascular events, these studies have not been very useful in the identification of mTBI. For example, it has been documented that an athlete can have significant cognitive compromise and still have normal imaging. 26 The difficulty in imaging mTBI stems from the microscopic axonal damage 27 and subsequent cellular dysfunction 28 that underlies the pathology.

The use of neuropsychological techniques in the assessment of the brain-injured athlete is not new, although there has been a renewed interest in its use within the realm of sports medicine. Neuropsychological testing provides an assessment and quantification of brain function by examining brain–behavior relationships. Neuropsychological testing may be more sensitive in assessing cognitive function in the brain-injured athlete than the more traditional diagnostic studies listed above. Neuropsychological testing has been useful in the assessment of the acute and recovery phases of mTBI. 29–31 These measurements assess memory recall, attention and concentration, problem-solving abilities, visual tracking, reaction time, and speed of information processing as well as other measures of cognitive function. Neuropsychological testing has been used specifically in the assessment of the head-injured athlete, 32–36 in cross-sectional studies of athletes 30,37,38 as well as in assessing the effects of heading in soccer players. 39 Much of the literature using neuropsychological testing has been in American football, with sparse data in other sports and on female athletes.

The goal for the sports medicine team taking care of the brain-injured athlete is to ensure appropriate acute care as well as safely returning the athlete to play. The health and well-being of the athlete is the primary concern, with significant danger being associated with premature return to play. The athletes should be returned to competition as soon as possible without putting them at risk for further injury.

The current study was designed to assess the usefulness of neuropsychological testing in the assessment of concussion in college athletes. It used a prospective design in a competitive Division I university setting where close observation and follow-up is available, and included multiple sports as well as both male and female athletes. The assessments included classic medical testing (including a complete neurologic examination) and a battery of neuropsychological tests. Preinjury baseline testing was obtained on all athletes, with subsequent repeat testing if an athlete sustained an mTBI. This article represents the results of the first 29 athletes who sustained an mTBI as part of the Penn State Cerebral Concussion Program (PSCCP).

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Program Description

The PSCCP was established in 1995 as a prospective neuropsychological evaluation of athletes who were considered to be at risk for mTBI. The methodology of the program was based on the pioneering work of Dr. Jeff Barth and his colleagues 47 at the University of Virginia, who first introduced the concept of “baseline” testing in sport neuropsychology. Originally, the PSCCP included athletes from football, men's and women's soccer, men's ice hockey, and men's and women's basketball. Baseball and swimming (men's and women's) participated as control sports. Currently, the program has expanded to include wrestling, women's lacrosse, and the ice hockey teams from Princeton University and Acadia University. To date, a total of 996 baseline assessments have been conducted. Data from the first 29 athletes who sustained an mTBI will be reported along with the data of 20 same-sport, noninjured controls.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Participants

Participants were 49 (45 male, 4 female) college-level athletes participating in the PSCCP. The sample was 82% Caucasian, 12% African American, 1.6% Latino, and 4.4% participants with undeclared ethnicity. The participants included 29 individuals who suffered an mTBI during athletic competition, and 20 individuals who served as control subjects for those who experienced an mTBI. Control subjects were matched on the basis of age, gender, sport played, and ethnicity. There were fewer control subjects than injured athletes because, in some cases, one control participant was matched with more than one injured athlete. This multiple matching was necessary because there were a limited number of players who fit the matching criteria and who could serve as controls within some sports. This methodology has been used in other studies of this type. 18,47 Control subjects were examined at the same time intervals as their injured counterparts; however, due to logistical concerns they were not necessarily examined on the same day. For example, an injured player and his or her control may not have played in the same game on the day of injury. However, if a player was injured during a practice, their control was also tested after a practice. Similarly, if a player was injured during a game, the control was tested following a game. The time intervals of testing for the injured player were then matched for their corresponding control.

A total of 113 evaluation sessions were conducted for those who experienced an mTBI (injured), and 88 test sessions for those individuals who served as control subjects. Of the injuries, 12 (43%) occurred in football, 3 (10%) occurred in men's soccer, 10 (33%) occurred in men's ice hockey, 1 (4%) occurred in women's basketball, and 3 (10%) occurred in men's basketball.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Assessment Battery

Table 1 presents the tests used in the assessment battery along with the cognitive functions that are assessed by each test. As can be seen, the assessment battery consisted of 11 neuropsychological tests chosen to assess various aspects of memory, learning, attention, concentration, and information processing. The tests included The Post Concussion Symptom Checklist, The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), 40 Symbol Digit Modalities Test, 41 Symbol Digit Modalities—Memory, Digit Span Test, 42 The Penn State Cancellation Test, Trail Making Test, 43 Controlled Oral Word Association Task (COWAT), 44 The Stroop Test, 45 Vigil Continuous Performance Test, 46 and a five-word list-learning task.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Several factors were taken into account in test selection. Since there was a limited amount of time available for testing athletes, the neurocognitive domains that were assessed targeted those cognitive systems that are known to be at risk following mTBI. The test instruments chosen needed to be short in duration, easily administered without extensive neuropsychological training, have sound psychometric properties (see references above for each test), have a history of use with athletes, and produce minimal levels of frustration. Each of the measures described above has been used extensively with athletes and has demonstrated adequate levels of reliability and validity. These measures were also found to be useful and recommended for the assessment of sports-related mTBI by the Sport Neuropsychology Panel. 48

Two measures of verbal learning and memory were analyzed for this study, the HVLT and a five-word list-learning task. As with any long-term clinical protocol, tests within a battery may be substituted, as data suggest that alternative measures may prove to be more useful. The five-word list-learning task was initially included in the battery because it was often used clinically with athletes, was easy to administer, and data had suggested that it would be appropriate for this population. 44 However, after the first 2 years of the program, it was determined that the list-learning task generated a ceiling effect that limited its usefulness in assessing some athletes. In other words, the task was too easy. The list-learning task was replaced with the more difficult 12-word format of the HVLT. As a result, some of the athletes early in the program were tested with the list-learning task, and others who were assessed later in the program were given the HVLT.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Assessment Sequence

Each participant in this study completed a baseline neuropsychological evaluation prior to the start of their athletic career at Penn State. During the first year of the program, all athletes were evaluated prior to the start of contact practice. The initial assessment, or baseline testing, required approximately 40 minutes to administer. In addition to evaluating each new player to the team, 25% of the team was reevaluated each year to control for developmental changes in baseline data.

If an athlete participating in the study suffered an mTBI during the course of the year, he or she was retested 2 hours following injury, 48 hours postinjury, 1 week postinjury, and 1 month postinjury. With the exception of the 2-hour assessment, all follow-up assessments used the same battery of tests as the baseline testing battery. Different forms of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, The Penn State Cancellation Test, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test were used to reduce practice effects. The 2-hour assessment was an abbreviated battery, which included the Concussion Symptoms Checklist, Digit Span Test, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (or List Learning Test), and the Stroop Test. An abbreviated battery was used at the 2-hour mark for several reasons. Since the assessment was relatively close to the time of injury, it was necessary to minimize the effects of fatigue and frustration. Ease of administration was a critical concern because the tests were generally given in a setting where traditional tables and chairs were unavailable (e.g., hallway, bus). The tests were also administered by team athletic trainers and physicians in addition to the neuropsychology project team. Given the number of people involved and the need for consistent, reliable test administration, the tests needed to have concise, uncomplicated instructions for administration. Because of these concerns, those measures that were thought to be the most sensitive, efficient, and easily administered were chosen for the abbreviated battery.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Performance on the 11 neuropsychological test instruments was assessed using 23 summary scores. A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was conducted to determine if there were significant differences in performance on the 23 summary variables between the mTBI group and the control group on the baseline evaluation (prior to injury). The covariate used in this analysis was the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT)–Total Score. SAT was used as a covariate to control for the effects of general cognitive ability on neuropsychological test scores. The MANCOVA (Pillai's Trace) did not reveal a significant main effect for active/control group membership at baseline testing, F(10,23) = 1.59, p = 0.227, η2 = 0.787. SAT scores were not found to be a significant covariate for neuropsychological performance with this assessment battery, F(24,1) = 1.64, p = 0.558, and for this reason, SAT was not used in subsequent analyses. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) procedures were used to determine if statistical differences between mTBI athletes and control subjects existed on neuropsychological measures at the four test intervals following baseline testing (2 hours postinjury, 48 hours postinjury, 1 week postinjury, and 1 month postinjury).

At 2 hours postinjury, a MANOVA indicated that control subjects performed significantly better on neuropsychological tests in the abbreviated assessment battery when compared with the performance of concussed athletes at the same testing interval, F(12,10) = 8.70, p < 0.000, η2 = 0.913. Controls performed better than injured athletes on all 12 neuropsychological indices in the abbreviated battery. As can be seen in Table 2, 6 of the 12 univariate F-tests showed statistically significant differences between mTBI athletes as compared with control subjects. Figure 1 presents the group data normalized to a mean of 100 and standard deviation (SD) of 15. The findings suggest that mTBI athletes performed significantly worse on measures of working memory, attention and concentration, and verbal learning when compared with noninjured controls.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools

At 48 hours postinjury, significant differences between mTBI athletes and control subjects were found using MANOVA, F(24,15) = 6.18, p < 0.000, η2 = 0.908. Control subjects performed better on 20 of 23 measures of neuropsychological functioning (full battery) when compared with mTBI athletes at the same time intervals. Presented in Table 3 are the data from the five measures that reached statistically significant differences between injured and noninjured participants, with control athletes scoring higher on all five tests. Figure 2 presents the data using normalized scores (mean = 100, SD = 15). As can be seen, significant differences were obtained on measures of working memory, verbal learning, verbal memory, divided attention, and speed of information processing, with injured athletes scoring significantly below noninjured controls.

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools

Of interest is the greater discrepancy between injured and noninjured athletes at 48 hours on the Hopkins Learning Index (HLI) measure, when compared with their data at the 2-hour postinjury evaluation. Presented in Figure 4 are the HLI data from each testing interval. The groups are indistinguishable at baseline. Beginning with the 2-hour evaluation and continuing through the 48-hour evaluation, the control athletes appeared to be making use of prior exposure to the task and demonstrated the expected “practice effect” on this measure. In other words, the control athletes were learning how to make their performance more efficient. In contrast, the injured athletes' performance declined at the 48-hour mark. At 1 week postinjury, the injured athletes began to recover, with the groups reaching equivalent scores at 1 month postinjury.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools

At 1 week postinjury the controls continued to score better than their concussed counterparts on 20 of the 23 neuropsychological indices. However, when subjected to a MANOVA procedure, the differences between injured athletes and controls were not significant, F(24,7) = 0.906, p = 0.608, η2 = 0.756. Given the exploratory nature of this study, the univariate ANOVAs were examined. Table 4 presents the results of four univariate F-tests that were significant, with control subjects scoring higher on each of these tests. This finding suggests that some participants may have continued to experience problems with visual–motor speed, working memory, sustained attention and concentration, and reaction time up to 1 week postinjury. However, given that the overall MANOVA did not reach significance, these results were only considered suggestive.

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools

A MANOVA procedure could not be used at 1 month postinjury because missing data for some of the participants led to an unacceptably low number of cases for inclusion in the analysis. Consequently, a series of ANOVAs (with Bonferroni correction) were conducted using the neuropsychological tests as dependent measures and injured versus control status as factors. Of the 23 analyses, only one reached statistical significance. Injured athletes performed better than their controls on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, total correct; F(1,38) = 5.867, p = 0.020. Injured athletes achieved a group mean of 71.53 and control athletes scored 70.88. Although statistically significant, the difference between the means is clinically insignificant.

Lastly, an examination of Tables 2 through 4 and Figures 1 through 4 reveals interesting differences between the variability in scores for those athletes with mTBI and the controls. The standard deviations depicted in the graphs reflect a pattern of markedly greater variability among the concussed athletes when compared with the controls. This finding strongly underscores the individual differences that exist among athletes with mTBI and, as will be discussed later, reinforces the notion that return-to-play decisions should be based on idiographic, not group comparisons.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

This study examined whether neuropsychological assessment techniques could differentiate between college athletes who sustained an mTBI and same-sport noninjured controls. The results indicated that the injured athletes did not significantly differ from the control group on demographic and neuropsychological test data at baseline. It was also found that SAT scores were not a significant covariate of the neuropsychological test data for either group. This finding was surprising since significant relationships between general cognitive abilities and neuropsychological test scores have been found in the literature. 44 It is possible that a relationship did not emerge because the neuropsychological tests that were used in this study were selected for their ability to detect changes that were specific to the sequelae of mTBI. Consequently, the tests may not have assessed enough of the general intellectual factor that is thought to be measured by the SAT. Alternatively, it may be argued that since the SAT was designed to predict college performance, it is not a robust measure of general cognitive abilities.

The results of the study indicate that neuropsychological tests were able to significantly differentiate between injured athletes and their controls at 2 hours postinjury. Injured athletes scored significantly lower on tests assessing attention and concentration, verbal learning, and verbal memory. The magnitude of the difference between the controls and injured subjects was not only statistically robust, it was clinically significant with three of the tests showing a difference greater than 1 standard deviation between injured athletes and controls. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a limited neuropsychological test battery being used within hours of the concussive event. The finding strongly suggests that neuropsychological instruments have utility in identifying cognitive changes following mTBI within 2 hours of injury. Usually, neuropsychological tests have been used to monitor recovery of function within the context of sports. These data suggest that the tests may also be useful in the diagnosis of mTBI.

At 48 hours postinjury, neuropsychological tests continued to significantly differentiate between injured athletes and controls. Again, robust differences were found in the overall MANOVA between injured and noninjured athletes. Five measures demonstrated statistically significant differences on follow-up univariate analyses with control athletes performing significantly better on tests assessing working memory, attention and concentration, verbal learning, verbal memory, and divided attention. Although five measures reached statistically significant differences, controls outperformed injured athletes on 20 of the 23 summary scores. This finding suggests that cerebral concussions may disrupt a wide range of cognitive functions 48 hours postinjury. As the sample size continues to grow over time in this project, it is likely that a greater number of tests will reach statistical as well as clinical significance.

Also of interest is that the average scores of the injured athletes decreased from the 2-hour assessment to the 48-hour assessment on the HLI, which was one of the three tests that was found to significantly differentiate between the two groups. While the injured athletes' scores decreased, the control athletes' scores improved over the same time period, thereby widening the gap between injured and noninjured athletes. In other words, the control subjects demonstrated a practice effect whereas the injured athletes' performance deteriorated. This finding may be understood in the context of the biochemical cascade models that have been developed on animals. Hovda and colleagues 28 have described a neurochemical and metabolic cascade that occurs following mTBI. Within the first hour of injury and subsequently up to several days postinjury, the brain is hypothesized to be in a vulnerable state due to an acute increase in glucose metabolism and diminished regional cerebral blood flow. The reduction in blood flow is thought to be produced by the effects of Ca++ on hemodynamics. 28 The imbalance between glucose needs and available supply begins within minutes of the injury and then begins to recover over time (up to 10 days postinjury). An interesting parallel can be seen in our HLI data where the injured athletes experienced difficulty in verbal learning almost immediately postinjury. This difficulty increased by 48 hours postinjury and then gradually began to “catch up” to the noninjured data by 1 week. At 1 month postinjury, the two groups were indistinguishable. Unfortunately, we do not have data on intermediate time intervals such as 1 day postinjury, 5 days postinjury, 10 days postinjury, etc., to more fully understand the rates of cognitive deterioration and recovery after mTBI. Additional studies will be needed that use different timelines. Data from the various studies can then be combined to generate more continuous descriptions of this phenomenon.

This failure of the injured athletes to demonstrate a practice effect has implications for return-to-play decision making. As can be seen in Figure 3, at 1 month postinjury the control and injured groups do not differ from each other. However, both groups now have scores that are greater than those obtained at baseline. Given these data, it may be argued that a return to preseason baseline scores is not a sufficient indicator of “normal” functioning. In fact, the player may need to produce scores that exceed baseline scores on measures with known practice effects.

The deterioration in performance within 48 hours postinjury also has implications for the sequence of assessment. Although tests administered within minutes or hours of injury are useful, they may not be enough. It is quite possible that an athlete would score within the expected range at 2 hours but show a significant deterioration at 24 or 48 hours postinjury. This possibility has implications for the use of sideline assessments without follow-up serial testing.

The Post-Concussion Symptoms Scale revealed significantly more symptoms being reported by injured athletes when compared with controls at the 2-hour assessment. Injured athletes reported a greater frequency of headache, dizziness, nausea, balance problems, drowsiness, sensitivity to light and noise, feeling “slowed down” and “foggy”, memory problems, and problems concentrating. By the time athletes reached the 48-hour mark, there was no significant difference between injured athletes and controls in symptom reporting. This finding is important in light of the significant differences found in the neuropsychological tests at the same time period. Within this sample of athletes, only the neuropsychological test data differentiated the groups at 48 hours. These data indicate that without neuropsychological testing, it is possible to return a player to sport who reports feeling well, but continues to experience cognitive sequelae from the concussion. This premature return to play may have serious deleterious consequences for the athlete, particularly in light of the vulnerability model described earlier.

No multivariate group differences were found between the injured athletes and controls at 1 week postinjury. This result is consistent with those of Collins et al., 18 indicating that most players have returned to the same level of functioning as uninjured athletes by 1 week after injury. However, univariate tests conducted at 1 week postinjury revealed significant differences between injured athletes and controls on measures of working memory, reaction time, and sustained attention. Although no definitive conclusions can be drawn in the absence of a significant MANOVA, these findings suggest that some athletes may continue to experience cognitive disturbances 1 week (or more) after injury.

At 1 month postinjury, only one neuropsychological measure reached significance using ANOVA, with injured athletes performing better than their noninjured counterparts. Although the difference in means is clinically insignificant, the finding raises an interesting question. First, given that a MANOVA could not be conducted due to missing player data, it is quite possible that the finding is simply a Type I error and due solely to chance. Yet our clinical experiences with the athletes in the study have led us to observe that injured athletes are highly motivated to perform well on these tests; failure to perform well could keep them or take them out of play. Other than their intrinsic competitive drive (which is often challenged by these tests), the control athletes have little motivation to perform well. The 1-month testing is their fifth time being tested and they may be “tired of it.” As such, they did not perform poorly, they just did not perform as well as their more motivated counterparts. The issue of motivation in neuropsychological testing is important and will be addressed in another paper.

Taken together, the results of this study underscore the utility of neuropsychological testing prior to and following a sports-related mTBI. The data from these tests provide the sports medicine team with an objective index of cognitive functioning that can signal the return to preinjury levels of functioning. The neuropsychological data differentiated injured from control athletes better than using a report of symptoms alone. However, there are several limitations to this study. Although sizable relative to other prospective studies, the sample size in this study was limited. Additional data are being collected that in the years to come will provide a better understanding of the utility of neuropsychological tests. The data in this study were only analyzed at the group level. Although this approach is important in assessing the utility of neuropsychological tests, it obscures the significant individual variability that exists among the injured athletes. This variability was discussed earlier in light of the marked differences in standard deviations on most of the measures between the athletes with mTBI and their controls. Clinically, these indices of variability imply that there are injured individuals functioning normally at the 2-hour assessment and some functioning in the impaired range at the 1-month assessment. Group data are useful benchmarks, but return-to-play decisions must be made at the individual level. It is for this reason that baseline testing is essential in the neuropsychological assessment of injured athletes.

Group data also obscure the variability that exists between neuropsychological tests. As can be seen from the present data, different tests may be useful at different time periods. Clinical examination of individual player data indicates that cerebral concussions affect players in different ways. Some have memory disturbances, some have problems in learning, others have slow reaction times, some have physiologic symptoms and no cognitive decline, and some report no symptoms and have frank cognitive declines. These differences in impairment may reflect differences in the type (e.g., linear, rotational), location, and severity of the blow that caused the mTBI. To identify these differences, a battery of tests must be used since no single test has demonstrated the sensitivity or the specificity that is necessary for clinically relevant and empirically supported return-to-play decisions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgment:

The authors would like to thank the following persons for their valuable assistance in data collection and management: David Sabsevitz, Cathy Elsinger, Kevin Kachin, Jim Chok, Tracey Shissler, Dimitrios Donavos, and John Furtado.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Kraus JF. Epidemiology of head injury. In: Cooper PR, ed. Head Injury. 2ndEd. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1987:1–19.

2. Powell JW. Traumatic brain injury in high school athletes. JAMA 1999; 282:958–963.

3. Dick RW. A summary of head and neck injuries in collegiate athletics using the NCAA Injury Surveillance System. In: Hoerner EF, ed. Head Neck Injuries in Sports. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1997.

4. Buckley WE. Concussions in college football. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16:51–56.

5. Wilberger JE. Minor head injuries in American football. Sports Med 1993; 15:338–343.

6. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee to Study Head Injury Nomenclature. Proceedings of the Congress of neurological Surgeons in 1964. Clin Neurosurg 1966;12:386–394.

7. McLatchie G, Jennett B. ABC of sports med: head injury in sport. Brit Med J 1994; 308:1620–1624.

8. Saunders RL, Harbaugh, RE. The second impact in catastrophic contact-sports head trauma. JAMA 1984; 252:538–539.

9. Spear J. Are footballers at risk for developing dementia? Intl J Geriatr Psychiatry 1995; 10:1011–1014.

10. Mayeux R, Ottman R, Tang MX, et al. Genetic susceptibility and head injury as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease among community-dwelling elderly persons and their first degree relatives. Ann Neurol 1993; 33:494–501.

11. Mortimer JA, French LR, Hutton JT, et al. Head injury as a risk for Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1985; 35:264–266.

12. Quality Standards Subcommittee, American Academy of Neurology, Practice Parameter: The management of concussion in sports (summary statement). Neurology 1997;48:581–585.

13. Cantu RC. Return to play guidelines after a head injury. Clinics Sports Med 1998; 17:45–60.

14. Colorado Medical Society. Guidelines for the Management of Concussion in Sports. Colorado Medical Society, Sports Medicine Committee, May 1990 (revised May 1991).

15. Nelson WE, Jane JA, Gieck JH. Minor head injury in sports: a new classification and management. Phys Sportsmed 1984; 12:103–107.

16. Torg JS. Athletic Injuries to the Head, Neck, and Face. St. Louis: Mosby-Year, 1991.

17. Kelly JP, Rosenburg JH. Diagnosis and management of concussion in sport. Neurology 1997; 48:575–580.

18. Collins MW, Grindel, SH, Lovell MR, et al. Relationship between concussion and neuropsychologicalal performance in college football players. JAMA 1999; 282:964–970.

19. Lovell MR, Iverson, GL, Collins MW, et al. Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychologicalal decrements after concussion? Clin J Sport Med 1999; 9:193–198.

20. Kirkpatrick PJ. Use of near-infrared spectroscopy in the adult. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences 1997;352:701–705.

21. Robertson CS, Chance B. A new application for near-infrared spectroscopy: Detection of delayed intracranial hematomas after head injury. J Neurotrauma 1995; 12:591–600.

22. Masdeu JC, Abdel-Dayem H, Van Heertum RL. Head trauma: use of SPECT. J Neuroimag 1995; 5(Suppl.1):S53–57.

23. Lewis DH. Functional brain imaging with cerebral perfusion SPECT in cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, and trauma. Neurosurg Clinics NA 1997; 8:337–344.

24. James CA. Magnetic resonance angiography in trauma. Clin Neurosci 1997; 4:137–145.

25. Ono J, Harada K, Takahashi J, et al. Differentiation between dysmyelination and demyelination using magnetic resonance diffusional anisotropy. Brain Res 1995; 671:141–148.

26. Putukian M, Echemendia RJ. Managing successive minor head injuries: Which tests guide return to play? Phys Sportsmed 1996; 24:25–38.

27. Gennarelli TA. Mechanisms and pathophysiology of cerebral concussion. J Neurotrauma 1986; 1:23–29.

28. Hovda DA, Prins M, Becker DP, et al. Neurobiology of concussion. In: Bailes JE, Lovell MR, Maroon JC, eds. Sports-Related Concussion. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. 1999:12–51.

29. Abreau F, Templer DI, Schuyler BA, et al. Neuropsychological assessment of soccer players. Neuropsychol 1990; 4:175–181.

30. Rimel RW, Giordanni B, Barth JT. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurg 1981; 9:221–228.

31. Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, et al. Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma. Neurosurg 1982; 11:344–351.

32. Levin HS, Amparo E, Eisenberg HM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. J Neurosurg 1987; 66:706–713.

33. Alves WM, Rimel RW, Nelson WE. University of Virginia prospective study of football-induced minor head injury: status report. Clin Sports Med 1987; 6:208–211.

34. Tysvaer AT, Lochen EA. Soccer injuries to the brain: a neuropsychological study of former soccer players. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19:56–60.

35. McLatchie G, Brooks N, Galbraith S, et al. Clinical neurological examination, neuropsychology, electroencephalography and computed tomographic head scanning in active amateur boxers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50:96–99.

36. Porter MD, Fricker PA. Controlled prospective neuropsychologicalal assessment of active experienced amateur boxers. Clin J Sport Med 1996; 6:90–96.

37. Haglund Y, Eriksson E. Does amateur boxing lead to chronic brain damage? A review of some recent investigations. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21:97–109.

38. Matser EJT, Kessels AG, Lezak MD, et al. Neuropsychological impairment in amateur soccer players. JAMA 1999; 282:971–973.

39. Putukian M, Echemendia RJ, Mackin RS. The acute neuropsychological effects of heading in soccer: a pilot study. Clin J Sport Med 2000; 10:104–109.

40. Brandt J. The Hopkins verbal learning test: Development of a new verbal memory test with six equivalent forms. Clin Neuropsychol 1991; 5:125–142.

41. Smith A. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1982.

42. Williams M. Cognitive Behavior Rating Scale. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1991.

43. Partington JE, Leiter RG. Partington's Pathway Test. New York: The Psychological Service Center Bulletin, 1949.

44. Lezak M. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

45. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exper Psychol 1935; 18:643–662.

46. The Psychological Corporation. Vigil/W Continuous Performance Test. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp., 1994.

47. Barth JT, Alves WM, Ryan TV, et al. Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AL, eds. Mild Head Injury. New York: Oxford, 1989:257–275.

48. Lovell MR, Collins MW. Neuropsychological assessment of the college football player. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1998: 13;9–26.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 130 time(s).

Medical Journal of Australia
Increasing incidence of hospitalisation for sport-related concussion in Victoria, Australia
Finch, CF; Clapperton, AJ; McCrory, P
Medical Journal of Australia, 198(8): 427-430.
10.5694/mja12.11217
CrossRef
Clinics in Sports Medicine
Return to play following sports-related concussion
Lovell, M; Collins, M; Bradley, J
Clinics in Sports Medicine, 23(3): 421-+.
10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.001
CrossRef
Journal of Athletic Training
Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion?
Randolph, C; McCrea, M; Barr, WB
Journal of Athletic Training, 40(3): 139-152.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Research based recommendations on management of sport related concussion: summary of the National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement
Guskiewicz, KM; Bruce, SL; Cantu, RC; Ferrara, MS; Kelly, JP; McCrea, M; Putukian, M; McLeod, TCV
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(1): 6-10.
10.1136/bjsm.2005.021683
CrossRef
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics sports medicine battery
Cernich, A; Reeves, D; Sun, WY; Bleiberg, J
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(1): S101-S114.
10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.008
CrossRef
Neurorehabilitation
Use of computer based testing of youth hockey players with concussions
Brooks, DA
Neurorehabilitation, 22(3): 169-179.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Who should conduct and interpret the neuropsychological assessment in sports-related concussion?
Echemendia, RJ; Herring, S; Bailes, J
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(): I32-I35.
10.1136/bjsm.2009.058164
CrossRef
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
The neuropsychological impact of sports-related concussion: A meta-analysis
Belanger, HG; Vanderploeg, RD
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11(4): 345-357.
10.1017/S1355617705050411
CrossRef
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
What are the real risks of sport-related concussion, and are they modifiable?
Randolph, C; Kirkwood, MW
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(4): 512-520.
10.1017/S135561770909064X
CrossRef
Radiology
Diffusion-Tensor Imaging Implicates Prefrontal Axonal Injury in Executive Function Impairment Following Very Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Lipton, ML; Gulko, E; Zimmerman, ME; Friedman, BW; Kim, M; Gellella, E; Gold, T; Shifteh, K; Ardekani, BA; Branch, CA
Radiology, 252(3): 816-824.
10.1148/radiol.2523081584
CrossRef
Journal of Neurotrauma
Advances in Sport Concussion Assessment: From Behavioral to Brain Imaging Measures
Ellemberg, D; Henry, LC; Macciocchi, SN; Guskiewicz, KM; Broglio, SP
Journal of Neurotrauma, 26(): 2365-2382.
10.1089/neu.2009.0906
CrossRef
Safety in Ice Hockey: 5Th Volume
A Synthesis of the World Literature of Ice Hockey Injuries: Epidemiologic Principles and Future Directions
Stuart, MJ; Dajani, KA; Crawford, BJ; Gill, ML; Link, AA; Smith, AM
Safety in Ice Hockey: 5Th Volume, 1516(): 11-72.
10.1520/JAI101778
CrossRef
Pediatrics
Postconcussive Symptoms and Neurocognitive Function After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children
Sroufe, NS; Fuller, DS; West, BT; Singal, BM; Warschausky, SA; Maio, RF
Pediatrics, 125(6): E1331-E1339.
10.1542/peds.2008-2364
CrossRef
Clinical Neurophysiology
Differential effect of first versus second concussive episodes on wavelet information quality of EEG
Slobounov, S; Cao, C; Sebastianelli, W
Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(5): 862-867.
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.009
CrossRef
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Development and validation of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol for sports-related return-to-play decision-making
Erlanger, D; Feldman, D; Kutner, K; Kaushik, T; Kroger, H; Festa, J; Barth, J; Freeman, J; Broshek, D
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(3): 293-316.
PII S0887-6177(02)00138-5
CrossRef
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion
McCrea, M; Barr, WB; Guskiewicz, K; Randolph, C; Marshall, SW; Cantu, R; Onate, JA; Kelly, JP
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11(1): 58-69.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion
Iverson, GL; Lovell, MR; Collins, MW
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27(6): 683-689.
10.1080/13803390490918435
CrossRef
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Head injuries and concussions in soccer
Delaney, JS; Frankovich, R
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 15(4): 214-217.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Reproducibility of computer based neuropsychological testing among Norwegian elite football players
Straume-Naesheim, TM; Andersen, TE; Bahr, R
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(): I64-I69.
10.1136/bjsm.2005.019620
CrossRef
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Hand movement span after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study
Frencham, KAR; Maybery, MT; Fox, AM
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(4): 580-584.
10.1017/S1355617706060711
CrossRef
Pediatrics
Sport-Related Concussion
Meehan, WP; Bachur, RG
Pediatrics, 123(1): 114-123.
10.1542/peds.2008-0309
CrossRef
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Medical Malpractice and the Sports Medicine Clinician
Kane, SM; White, RA
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(2): 412-419.
10.1007/s11999-008-0589-5
CrossRef
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Which symptom assessments and approaches are uniquely appropriate for paediatric concussion?
Gioia, GA; Schneider, JC; Vaughan, CG; Isquith, PK
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(): I13-I22.
10.1136/bjsm.2009.058255
CrossRef
Journal of Athletic Training
Monitoring resolution of postconcussion symptoms in athletes: Preliminary results of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol
Erlanger, D; Saliba, E; Barth, J; Almquist, J; Webright, W; Freeman, J
Journal of Athletic Training, 36(3): 280-287.

Neuropsychology
Delayed-onset deficits in verbal encoding strategies among patients with mild traumatic brain injury
Bruce, JM; Echemendia, RJ
Neuropsychology, 17(4): 622-629.
10.1037/0894-4105.17.4.622
CrossRef
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Neuropsychological studies of mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review of research since 1995
Frencham, KAR; Fox, AM; Maybery, MT
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27(3): 334-351.
10.1080/13803390490520328
CrossRef
Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine
Management of cerebral concussion in military personnel: Lessons learned from sports medicine
Lovell, M; Collins, M; Pardini, JE; Parodi, CDRA; Yates, A
Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 13(4): 212-221.
10.1053/j.otsm.2006.01.005
CrossRef
Journal of Neurosurgery
Symptom-based assessment of the severity of a concussion
Erlanger, D; Kaushik, T; Cantu, R; Barth, JT; Broshek, DK; Freeman, JR; Webbe, FM
Journal of Neurosurgery, 98(3): 477-484.

Neuroradiology
Abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging seen acutely following mild traumatic brain injury: correlation with neuropsychological tests and delayed recovery
Hughes, DG; Jackson, A; Mason, DL; Berry, E; Hollis, S; Yates, DW
Neuroradiology, 46(7): 550-558.
10.1007/s00234-004-1227-x
CrossRef
Brain Injury
Recovery from sports concussion in high school and collegiate athletes
McClincy, MP; Lovell, MR; Pardini, J; Collins, MW; Spore, MK
Brain Injury, 20(1): 33-39.
10.1080/02699050500309817
CrossRef
Applied Neuropsychology
Cross-validation of measures used for computer-based assessment of concussion
Schatz, P; Putz, BO
Applied Neuropsychology, 13(3): 151-159.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Neuropsychological evaluation in the diagnosis and management of sports-related concussion
Moser, RS; Iverson, GL; Echemendia, RJ; Lovell, MR; Schatz, P; Webbe, FM; Ruff, RM; Barth, JT
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(8): 909-916.
10.1016/j.acn.2007.09.004
CrossRef
Clinics in Sports Medicine
The Management of Sports-Related Concussion: Current Status and Future Trends
Lovell, M
Clinics in Sports Medicine, 28(1): 95-+.
10.1016/j.csm.2008.08.008
CrossRef
Pediatric Annals
Computerized Neurocognitive Testing in the Medical Evaluation of Sports Concussion
Darby, DG; Master, CL; Grady, MF
Pediatric Annals, 41(9): 371-376.
10.3928/00904481-20120827-11
CrossRef
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
Adolescent-Sports Concussion
Reddy, CC; Collins, MW; Gioia, GA
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 19(2): 247-+.
10.1016/j.pmr.2007.12.002
CrossRef
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
The impact of motivation on neuropsychological performance in sports-related mild traumatic brain injury
Bailey, CM; Echemendia, RJ; Arnett, PA
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(4): 475-484.
10.1017/S1355617706060619
CrossRef
Brain Injury
Cumulative effects of concussion in amateur athletes
Iverson, GL; Gaetz, M; Lovell, MR; Collins, MW
Brain Injury, 18(5): 433-443.
10.1080/02699050310001617352
CrossRef
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Children show decreased dynamic balance after mild traumatic brain injury
Gagnon, I; Swaine, B; Friedman, D; Forget, R
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(3): 444-452.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Medicolegal issues in sports medicine
Sanders, AK; Boggess, BR; Koenig, SJ; Toth, AP
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (): 38-49.
10.1097/01.blo.0000159764.03919.33
CrossRef
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Soccer heading frequency predicts neuropsychological deficits
Witol, AD; Webbe, FM
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(4): 397-417.
PII S0887-6177(02)00151-8
CrossRef
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Understanding sports-related concussion - Coming into focus but still fuzzy
McKeag, DB
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(): 2604-2605.

Injury Prevention
Evaluation of the ThinkFirst Canada, Smart Hockey, brain and spinal cord injury prevention video
Cook, DJ; Cusimano, MD; Tator, CH; Chipman, ML
Injury Prevention, 9(4): 361-365.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Effects of heading exposure and previous concussions on neuropsychological performance among Norwegian elite footballers
Straume-Naesheim, TM; Andersen, TE; Dvorak, J; Bahr, R
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(): I70-I77.
10.1136/bjsm.2005.019646
CrossRef
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries
Assessment and management of concussion: A neuropsychological perspective
Echemendia, RJ
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries, (): 431-443.

Neurologic Clinics
The neurophysiology and assessment of sports-related head injuries
Lovell, M
Neurologic Clinics, 26(1): 45-+.
10.1016/j.ncl.2007.12.001
CrossRef
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
Neurologic Injuries in Hockey (Reprinted from Neurologic Clinics, vol 26)
Wennberg, RA; Cohen, HB; Walker, SR
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 20(1): 215-+.
10.1016/j.pmr.2008.10.005
CrossRef
Neurocase
Neurophysiological assessment prior to and following sports-related concussion during childhood: A case study
Boutin, D; Lassonde, M; Robert, M; Vanassing, P; Ellemberg, D
Neurocase, 14(3): 239-248.
10.1080/13554790802247543
CrossRef
Clinics in Sports Medicine
Concussion Assessment and Management
Hunt, T; Asplund, C
Clinics in Sports Medicine, 29(1): 5-+.
10.1016/j.csm.2009.09.002
CrossRef
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries
Introductory chapter. Concussion in athletics: Ongoing controversy
Slobounov, S; Sebastianelli, W
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries, (): 1-16.

Sports Medicine
The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control - A meta-analysis
Broglio, SP; Puetz, TW
Sports Medicine, 38(1): 53-67.

Brain Injury
Electrophysiological abnormalities in well functioning multiple concussed athletes
Theriault, M; De Beaumont, L; Gosselin, N; Filipinni, M; Lassonde, M
Brain Injury, 23(): 899-906.
10.1080/02699050903283189
CrossRef
Pediatrics
Pediatric sport-related concussion: A review of the clinical management of an oft-neglected population
Kirkwood, MW; Yeates, KO; Wilson, PE
Pediatrics, 117(4): 1359-1371.
10.1542/peds.2005-0994
CrossRef
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries
Neuropsychological assessment of sports-related concussion: Measuring clinically significant change
Rosenbaum, AM; Arnett, PA; Bailey, CM; Echemendia, RJ
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries, (): 137-169.

Clinics in Sports Medicine
Psychological aspects of serious head injury in the competitive athlete
Putukian, M; Echemendia, RJ
Clinics in Sports Medicine, 22(3): 617-+.
10.1016/S0278-5919(02)00100-X
CrossRef
Applied Neuropsychology
Semantic clustering indexes for the Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Initial exploration in elder control and dementia groups
Gaines, JJ; Shapiro, A; Alt, M; Benedict, RHB
Applied Neuropsychology, 13(4): 213-222.

Neurorehabilitation
The relation between post concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance in concussed athletes
Fazio, VC; Lovell, MR; Pardini, JE; Collins, MW
Neurorehabilitation, 22(3): 207-216.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Return to play after sports concussion in elite and non-elite athletes?
Putukian, M; Aubry, M; McCrory, P
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(): I28-I31.
10.1136/bjsm.2009.058230
CrossRef
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries
EEG changes and balance deficits following concussion: One piece of the puzzle
Thompson, JWG
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries, (): 341-374.

Neurosurgery
Measurement of head impacts in collegiate football players: Relationship between head impact biomechanics and acute clinical outcome after concussion
Guskiewicz, KM; Mihalik, JP; Shankar, V; Marshall, SW; Crowell, DH; Oliaro, SM; Ciocca, MF; Hooker, DN
Neurosurgery, 61(6): 1244-1252.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000280146.37163.79
CrossRef
Brain Injury
Limitations of mild traumatic brain injury meta-analyses
Pertab, JL; James, KM; Bigler, ED
Brain Injury, 23(6): 498-508.
10.1080/02699050902927984
CrossRef
American Journal of Sports Medicine
Natural History of Concussion in Sport Markers of Severity and Implications for Management
Makdissi, M; Darby, D; Maruff, P; Ugoni, A; Brukner, P; McCrory, PR
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(3): 464-471.
10.1177/0363546509349491
CrossRef
Brain Injury
Emotional response to sport concussion compared to ACL injury
Mainwaring, LM; Bisschop, SM; Comper, P; Richards, DW; Hutchison, M
Brain Injury, 24(4): 589-597.
10.3109/02699051003610508
CrossRef
Sports Medicine
Recommendations for grading of concussion in athletes
Leclerc, S; Lassonde, M; Delaney, JS; Lacroix, VJ; Johnston, KM
Sports Medicine, 31(8): 629-636.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: implications for clinical neuropsychology
Lees-Haley, PR; Green, P; Rohling, ML; Fox, DD; Allen, LM
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(6): 585-594.
PII S0887-6177(02)00155-5
CrossRef
European Journal of Medical Research
Serum S-100B protein levels in young amateur soccer players after controlled heading and normal exercise
Mussack, T; Dvorak, J; Graf-Baumann, T; Jochum, M
European Journal of Medical Research, 8(): 457-464.

Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players - The NCAA Concussion Study
McCrea, M; Guskiewicz, KM; Marshall, SW; Barr, W; Randolph, C; Cantu, RC; Onate, JA; Yang, JZ; Kelly, JP
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(): 2556-2563.

Sports Medicine
Management of sport-related concussion in young athletes
Patel, DR; Shivdasani, V; Baker, RJ
Sports Medicine, 35(8): 671-684.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Concussion management by primary care providers
Pleacher, MD; Dexter, WW
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(1): -.
ARTN e2
CrossRef
Laryngoscope
Diagnosis and management of post-traumatic vertigo
Marzo, SJ; Leonetti, JP; Raffin, MJ; Letarte, P
Laryngoscope, 114(): 1720-1723.

American Journal of Sports Medicine
The "value added" of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion
Van Kampen, DA; Lovell, MR; Pardini, JE; Collins, MW; Fu, FH
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(): 1630-1635.
10.1177/0363546506288677
CrossRef
Applied Neuropsychology
Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: Reliability and normative data for the Post-Concussion Scale
Lovell, MR; Iverson, GL; Collins, MW; Podell, K; Johnston, KM; Pardini, D; Pardini, J; Norwig, J; Maroon, JC
Applied Neuropsychology, 13(3): 166-174.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
The development of a survey to examine knowledge about and attitudes toward concussion in high-school students
Rosenbaum, AM; Arnett, PA
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(1): 44-55.
10.1080/13803390902806535
CrossRef
Journal of Athletic Training
National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: Management of sport-related concussion
Guskiewicz, KM; Bruce, SL; Cantu, RC; Ferrara, MS; Kelly, JP; McCrea, M; Putukian, M; McLeod, TCV
Journal of Athletic Training, 39(3): 280-297.

Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries
Concussion management: What is our role?
Meza, F; Aukerman, D; Sebastianelli, W
Foundations of Sport-Related Brain Injuries, (): 377-389.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
The Neurophysiology and Assessment of Sports-Related Head Injuries (Reprinted from Neurologic Clinics, vol 26)
Lovell, M
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 20(1): 39-+.
10.1016/j.pmr.2008.10.003
CrossRef
Applied Neuropsychology
Return to play following sports-related mild traumatic brain injury: The role for neuropsychology
Echemendia, RJ; Cantu, RC
Applied Neuropsychology, 10(1): 48-55.

Brain Injury
Alterations to locomotor navigation in a complex environment at 7 and 30 days following a concussion in an elite athlete
Fait, P; McFadyen, BJ; Swaine, B; Cantin, JF
Brain Injury, 23(4): 362-369.
10.1080/02699050902788485
CrossRef
Sports Medicine
Evaluation of Instruments for Measuring the Burden of Sport and Active Recreation Injury
Andrew, NE; Gabbe, BJ; Wolfe, R; Cameron, PA
Sports Medicine, 40(2): 141-161.

Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players - The NCAA Concussion Study
Guskiewicz, KM; McCrea, M; Marshall, SW; Cantu, RC; Randolph, C; Barr, W; Onate, JA; Kelly, JP
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(): 2549-2555.

Neurologic Clinics
Neurologic injuries in hockey
Werinberg, RA; Cohen, HB; Walker, SR
Neurologic Clinics, 26(1): 243-+.
10.1016/j.ncl.2007.12.002
CrossRef
Ieee Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Automatic classification of athletes with residual functional deficits following concussion by means of EEG signal using support vector machine
Cao, C; Tutwiler, RL; Slobounov, S
Ieee Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 16(4): 327-335.
10.1109/TNSRE.2008.918422
CrossRef
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Is the simple versus complex classification of concussion a valid and useful differentiation?
Makdissi, M
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(): I23-I27.
10.1136/bjsm.2009.058206
CrossRef
American Journal of Sports Medicine
Relationship between postconcussion headache and neuropsychological test performance in high school athletes
Collins, MW; Field, M; Lovell, MR; Iverson, G; Johnston, KM; Maroona, J; Fu, FH
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 31(2): 168-173.

Applied Neuropsychology
Computer-based assessment of sports-related concussion
Schatz, P; Zillmer, EA
Applied Neuropsychology, 10(1): 42-47.

Neuroscience Letters
EEG and postural correlates of mild traumatic brain injury in athletes
Thompson, J; Sebastianelli, W; Slobounov, S
Neuroscience Letters, 377(3): 158-163.
10.1016/j.neulet.2004.11.090
CrossRef
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Congenital and acquired brain injury. 3. Spectrum of the acquired brain injury population
Kwasnica, C; Brown, AW; Elovic, EP; Kothari, S; Flanagan, SR
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(3): S15-S20.
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.006
CrossRef
Clinics in Sports Medicine
Rehabilitation of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Boxing Injuries
Lefkowitz, T; Flanagan, S; Varlotta, G
Clinics in Sports Medicine, 28(4): 623-+.
10.1016/j.csm.2009.07.002
CrossRef
Pediatric Clinics of North America
The college athlete
Patel, DR; Greydanus, DE; Luckstead, EF
Pediatric Clinics of North America, 52(1): 25-+.
10.1016/j.pcl.2004.10.006
CrossRef
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Mild traumatic brain injury: Neuroimaging of sports-related concussion
Mendez, CV; Hurley, RA; Lassonde, M; Zhang, LY; Taber, KH
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 17(3): 297-303.

Journal of Athletic Training
Athlete characteristics and outcome scores for computerized neuropsychological assessment: A preliminary analysis
Brown, CN; Guskiewicz, KM; Bleiberg, J
Journal of Athletic Training, 42(4): 515-523.

Ieee Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Alteration of Cortical Functional Connectivity as a Result of Traumatic Brain Injury Revealed by Graph Theory, ICA, and sLORETA Analyses of EEG Signals
Cao, C; Slobounov, S
Ieee Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 18(1): 11-19.
10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2027704
CrossRef
Neuropsychology Review
Mild traumatic brain injury in sports: Neuropsychology's contribution to a developing field
Echemendia, RJ; Julian, LJ
Neuropsychology Review, 11(2): 69-88.

Journal of Athletic Training
Postural stability and neuropsychological deficits after concussion in collegiate athletes
Guskiewicz, KM; Ross, SE; Marshall, SW
Journal of Athletic Training, 36(3): 263-273.

Journal of Athletic Training
Evidence for the factorial and construct validity of a self-report concussion symptoms scale
Piland, SG; Motl, RW; Ferrara, MS; Peterson, CL
Journal of Athletic Training, 38(2): 104-112.

American Journal of Sports Medicine
Grade 1 or "ding" concussions in high school athletes
Lovell, MR; Collins, MW; Iverson, GL; Johnston, KM; Bradley, JR
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(1): 47-54.
10.1177/0363546503260723
CrossRef
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Reaffirmed Limitations of Meta-Analytic Methods in the Study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Response to Rohling et al
Bigler, ED; Farrer, TJ; Pertab, JL; James, K; Petrie, JA; Hedges, DW
Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(2): 176-214.
10.1080/13854046.2012.693950
CrossRef
Nature Reviews Neurology
The clinical spectrum of sport-related traumatic brain injury
Jordan, BD
Nature Reviews Neurology, 9(4): 222-230.
10.1038/nrneurol.2013.33
CrossRef
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Day of injury assessment of sport-related concussion
McCrea, M; Iverson, GL; Echemendia, RJ; Makdissi, M; Raftery, M
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(5): 272-284.
10.1136/bjsports-2013-092145
CrossRef
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Onfield assessment of concussion in the adult athlete
Putukian, M; Raftery, M; Guskiewicz, K; Herring, S; Aubry, M; Cantu, RC; Molloy, M
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(5): 285-288.
10.1136/bjsports-2013-092158
CrossRef
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Advances in neuropsychological assessment of sport-related concussion
Echemendia, RJ; Iverson, GL; McCrea, M; Macciocchi, SN; Gioia, GA; Putukian, M; Comper, P
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(5): 294-298.
10.1136/bjsports-2013-092186
CrossRef
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Assessment of Processing Speed in Children with Mild TBI: A "First Look" at the Validity of Pediatric ImPACT
Newman, JB; Reesman, JH; Vaughan, CG; Gioia, GA
Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(5): 779-793.
10.1080/13854046.2013.789552
CrossRef
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Soldiers with Occult Traumatic Brain Injury
Lew, HL; Poole, JH; Alvarez, S; Moore, W
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(6): 393-398.
10.1097/01.phm.0000163703.91647.a7
PDF (425) | CrossRef
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Sports-Related and Gender Differences on Neuropsychological Measures of Frontal Lobe Functioning
Ryan, JP; Atkinson, TM; Dunham, KT
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 14(1): 18-24.

PDF (378)
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Differential Emotional Responses of Varsity Athletes to Concussion and Musculoskeletal Injuries
Hutchison, M; Mainwaring, LM; Comper, P; Richards, DW; Bisschop, SM
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 19(1): 13-19.
10.1097/JSM.0b013e318190ba06
PDF (120) | CrossRef
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Postural Stability Assessment Following Concussion: One Piece of the Puzzle
Guskiewicz, KM
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 11(3): 182-189.

PDF (832)
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Sport-Related Concussion: Factors Associated With Prolonged Return to Play
Asplund, CA; McKeag, DB; Olsen, CH
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 14(6): 339-343.

PDF (72)
Neurosurgery
Concussion in Professional Football: Recovery of NFL and High School Athletes Assessed by Computerized Neuropsychological Testing—Part 12
Pellman, EJ; Lovell, MR; Viano, DC; Casson, IR
Neurosurgery, 58(2): 263-274.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000200272.56192.62
CrossRef
Neurosurgery
In Vivo Study of Head Impacts in Football: A Comparison of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Versus High School Impacts
Schnebel, B; Gwin, JT; Anderson, S; Gatlin, R
Neurosurgery, 60(3): 490-496.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000249286.92255.7F
PDF (269) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Alteration of Postural Responses to Visual Field Motion in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Slobounov, S; Tutwiler, R; Sebastianelli, W; Slobounov, E
Neurosurgery, 59(1): 134-139.
10.1227/01.neu.0000243292.38695.2d
PDF (119) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Prolonged Effects of Concussion in High School Athletes
Moser, RS; Schatz, P; Jordan, BD
Neurosurgery, 57(2): 300-306.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000166663.98616.E4
PDF (166) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Recommendations on Management of Sport-related Concussion: Summary of the National Athletic Trainers’ Association Position Statement
McLeod, TC; Guskiewicz, KM; Bruce, SL; Cantu, RC; Ferrara, MS; Kelly, JP; McCrea, M; Putukian, M
Neurosurgery, 55(4): 891-896.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000143800.49798.19
PDF (1093) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Concussion in Professional Football: Injuries Involving 7 or More Days Out—Part 5
Pellman, EJ; Viano, DC; Casson, IR; Arfken, C; Powell, J
Neurosurgery, 55(5): 1100-1119.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000147063.12873.F5
PDF (458) | CrossRef
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Concussion (Mild Traumatic Brain Injury) and the Team Physician: A Consensus Statement*

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(2): 395-399.
10.1249/01.mss.0000202025.48774.31
PDF (121) | CrossRef
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Assessment of Cognitive Recovery Following Sports Related Head Trauma in Boxers
Ravdin, LD; Barr, WB; Jordan, B; Lathan, WE; Relkin, NR
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 13(1): 21-27.

PDF (333)
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
On-Field Predictors of Neuropsychological and Symptom Deficit Following Sports-related Concussion
Collins, MW; Iverson, GL; Lovell, MR; McKeag, DB; Norwig, J; Maroon, J
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 13(4): 222-229.

PDF (373)
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Evaluation of Neuropsychological Domain Scores and Postural Stability Following Cerebral Concussion in Sports
Peterson, CL; Ferrara, MS; Mrazik, M; Piland, S; Elliott, R
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 13(4): 230-237.

PDF (393)
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Prolonged Neuropsychological Impairments Following a First Concussion in Female University Soccer Athletes
Ellemberg, D; Leclerc, S; Couture, S; Daigle, C
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 17(5): 369-374.
10.1097/JSM.0b013e31814c3e3e
PDF (79) | CrossRef
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Assessment of Patients With Mild Concussion in the Emergency Department
Naunheim, RS; Matero, D; Fucetola, R
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 23(2): 116-122.
10.1097/01.HTR.0000314530.30401.70
PDF (129) | CrossRef
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
SLAM on the Stand: How the Sports‐Related Concussion Literature Can Inform the Expert Witness
Bailey, CM; Barth, JT; Bender, SD
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(2): 123-130.
10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819c1caa
PDF (131) | CrossRef
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Applications of Computer-based Neuropsychological Assessment
Schatz, P; Browndyke, J
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(5): 395-410.

PDF (439)
Neurosurgery
Concussion in Professional Football: Epidemiological Features of Game Injuries and Review of the Literature—Part 3
Pellman, EJ; Powell, JW; Viano, DC; Casson, IR; Tucker, AM; Feuer, H; Lovell, M; Waeckerle, JF; Robertson, DW
Neurosurgery, 54(1): 81-96.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000097267.54786.54
PDF (732) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
History of Multiple Self‐Reported Concussions Is Not Associated With Reduced Cognitive Abilities
Bruce, JM; Echemendia, RJ
Neurosurgery, 64(1): 100-106.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000336310.47513.C8
PDF (511) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Duration of Cognitive Impairment After Sports Concussion
Bleiberg, J; Cernich, AN; Cameron, K; Sun, W; Peck, K; Ecklund, LJ; Reeves, CD; Uhorchak, CJ; Sparling, MB; Warden, DL
Neurosurgery, 54(5): 1073-1080.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000118820.33396.6A
PDF (1773) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Neurophysiological Anomalies in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Concussed Athletes
Gosselin, N; Thériault, M; Leclerc, S; Montplaisir, J; Lassonde, M
Neurosurgery, 58(6): 1151-1161.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000215953.44097.FA
PDF (673) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Long‐Term and Cumulative Effects of Sports Concussion on Motor Cortex Inhibition
De Beaumont, L; Lassonde, M; Leclerc, S; Théoret, H
Neurosurgery, 61(2): 329-337.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000280000.03578.B6
PDF (443) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Differential Rate of Recovery in Athletes After First and Second Concussion Episodes
Slobounov, S; Slobounov, E; Sebastianelli, W; Cao, C; Newell, K
Neurosurgery, 61(2): 338-344.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000280001.03578.FF
PDF (462) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Functional Brain Abnormalities Are Related to Clinical Recovery and Time to Return‐to‐Play in Athletes
Lovell, MR; Pardini, JE; Welling, J; Collins, MW; Bakal, J; Lazar, N; Roush, R; Eddy, WF; Becker, JT
Neurosurgery, 61(2): 352-360.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000279985.94168.7F
PDF (321) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Effects of A Symptom‐Free Waiting Period on Clinical Outcome and Risk of Reinjury After Sport‐Related Concussion
McCrea, M; Guskiewicz, K; Randolph, C; Barr, WB; Hammeke, TA; Marshall, SW; Kelly, JP
Neurosurgery, 65(5): 876-883.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000350155.89800.00
PDF (647) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Concussion in Professional Football: Neuropsychological Testing—Part 6
Pellman, EJ; Lovell, MR; Viano, DC; Casson, IR; Tucker, AM
Neurosurgery, 55(6): 1290-1305.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000149244.97560.91
PDF (523) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Measurement of Head Impacts in Collegiate Football Players: Clinical Measures of Concussion After High‐ and Low‐Magnitude Impacts
McCaffrey, MA; Mihalik, JP; Crowell, DH; Shields, EW; Guskiewicz, KM
Neurosurgery, 61(6): 1236-1243.
10.1227/01.neu.0000306102.91506.8b
PDF (205) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

Neuropsychology; Sports; Concussion; Brain Injury

© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You Tube The CJSM Blog Linked In Facebook Twitter

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.