Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2010 - Volume 20 - Issue 5 > Return-to-Play in Sport: A Decision-based Model
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181f3c0fe
Review

Return-to-Play in Sport: A Decision-based Model

Creighton, David W MS; Shrier, Ian MD, PhD; Shultz, Rebecca PhD; Meeuwisse, Willem H MD, PhD; Matheson, Gordon O MD, PhD

Press Release
In the Press
Blog Link
Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: Return-to-play (RTP) decisions are fundamental to the practice of sports medicine but vary greatly for the same medical condition and circumstance. Although there are published articles that identify individual components that go into these decisions, there exists neither quantitative criteria nor a model for the sequence or weighting of these components within the medical decision-making process. Our objective was to develop a decision-based model for clinical use by sports medicine practitioners.

Data Sources: English literature related to RTP decision making.

Main Results: We developed a 3-step decision-based RTP model for an injury or illness that is specific to the individual practitioner making the RTP decision: health status, participation risk, and decision modification. In Step 1, the Health Status of the athlete is assessed through the evaluation of Medical Factors related to how much healing has occurred. In Step 2, the clinician evaluates the Participation Risk associated with participation, which is informed by not only the current health status but also by the Sport Risk Modifiers (eg, ability to protect the injury with padding, athlete position). Different individuals are expected to have different thresholds for “acceptable level of risk,” and these thresholds will change based on context. In Step 3, Decision Modifiers are considered and the decision to RTP or not is made.

Conclusions: Our model helps clarify the processes that clinicians use consciously and subconsciously when making RTP decisions. Providing such a structure should decrease controversy, assist physicians, and identify important gaps in practice areas where research evidence is lacking.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

​​You Tube The CJSM Blog Linked In Facebook Twitter

​NOW OVER 12K FOLLOWERS ON TWITTER

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.