Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2009 - Volume 37 - Issue 7 > Written information that relatives of adult intensive care u...
Critical Care Medicine:
July 2009 - Volume 37 - Issue 7 - pp 2197-2202
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a03063
Clinical Investigations

Written information that relatives of adult intensive care unit patients would like to receive-A comparison to published recommendations and opinion of staff members *

Soltner, Christophe MD; Lassalle, Vincent MD; Galienne-Bouygues, Sophie MD; Pottecher, Julien MD; Floccard, Bernard MD; Delapierre, Laurence MD; Jungfer, Francoise MD; Sargentini, Cyril MD; Alberti, Corrine MD, PhD; Beydon, Laurent MD, PhD; the Lifrea Group

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: Information booklets have not been assessed by the families of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study explored the information that the relatives of adult ICU patients wanted to find in the information booklets.

Design: Multicenter survey.

Setting: Twenty-three French ICUs.

Subjects: One close relative of each of 250 consecutive adult patients.

Methods: Relatives were asked about the desirability of finding information on each of the 24 topics identified by ICU physicians and listed in guidelines as deserving inclusion in information booklets.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: The 250 patients (61% men) had a mean age of 60 ± 18 years and a mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 48 ± 19; 57% had chronic comorbidities and 41% were surgical patients. At least 72% of the relatives felt that booklets should discuss nosocomial infections, treatment-limitation decisions, access to medical information on the patient, access to medical records, and the meaning of medical terms. Overall, relatives wanted more information than that anticipated by ICU physicians, suggested in guidelines, or found in booklets. However, for at least one of the 24 topics, 38% of relatives indicated that fear or poor comprehension made them unwilling to receive written information. These relatives were younger and had fewer years of formal education than did the other relatives, and they were more likely to be visiting conscious unrestrained patients.

Conclusions: Opinions of relatives should be taken into account when designing ICU information booklets. Relatives want more information than that anticipated by physicians or suggested in guidelines, but the youngest or the less-educated ones may respond less favorably to written information.

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.