Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2009 - Volume 37 - Issue 7 > The impact of body position on intra-abdominal pressure meas...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a021fa
Clinical Investigations

The impact of body position on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: A multicenter analysis *

Cheatham, Michael L. MD; De Waele, Jan J. MD, PhD; De Laet, Inneke MD; De Keulenaer, Bart MD; Widder, Sandy MD, FRCSC; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W. MD; Cresswell, Adrian B. MD; Malbrain, Manu MD, PhD; Bodnar, Zsolt MD; Mejia-Mantilla, Jorge H. MD; Reis, Richard MD; Parr, Michael MD; Schulze, Robert MD; Puig, Sonia MD; for the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) Clinical Trials Working Group

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality among the critically ill. IAP is most commonly measured using the intravesicular or “bladder” technique. The impact of changes in body position on the accuracy of IAP measurements, such as head of bed elevation to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, remains unclear.

Design: Prospective, cohort study.

Setting: Twelve international intensive care units.

Patients: One hundred thirty-two critically ill medical and surgical patients at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Interventions: Triplicate intravesicular pressure measurements were performed at least 4 hours apart with the patient in the supine, 15°, and 30° head of bed elevated positions. The zero reference point was the mid-axillary line at the iliac crest.

Measurements and Main Results: Mean IAP values at each head of bed position were significantly different (p < 0.0001). The bias between IAPsupine and IAP15° was 1.5 mm Hg (1.3–1.7). The bias between IAPsupine and IAP30° was 3.7 mm Hg (3.4–4.0).

Conclusions: Head of bed elevation results in clinically significant increases in measured IAP. Consistent body positioning from one IAP measurement to the next is necessary to allow consistent trending of IAP for accurate clinical decision making. Studies that involve IAP measurements should describe the patient’s body position so that these values may be properly interpreted.

© 2009 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.