Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2008 - Volume 36 - Issue 6 > A replicable method for blood glucose control in critically...
Critical Care Medicine:
June 2008 - Volume 36 - Issue 6 - pp 1787-1795
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181743a5a
Clinical Investigations

A replicable method for blood glucose control in critically Ill patients

Morris, Alan H. MD; Orme, James Jr MD; Truwit, Jonathon D. MD; Steingrub, Jay MD; Grissom, Colin MD; Lee, Kang H. MD; Li, Guoliang L.; Thompson, B Taylor MD; Brower, Roy MD; Tidswell, Mark MD; Bernard, Gordon R. MD; Sorenson, Dean PhD; Sward, Katherine RN, PhD; Zheng, Hui PhD; Schoenfeld, David PhD; Warner, Homer MD, PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Context: To ensure interpretability and replicability of clinical experiments, methods must be adequately explicit and should elicit the same decision from different clinicians who comply with the study protocol.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether clinician compliance with protocol recommendations exceeds 90%.

Design: We developed an adequately explicit computerized protocol (eProtocol-insulin) for managing critically ill adult patient blood glucose. We monitored clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations in four intensive care units in four hospitals and compared blood glucose distributions with those of a simple clinical guideline at one hospital and a paper-based protocol at another. All protocols and the guideline used intravenous insulin and 80 to 110 mg/dL (4.4-6.1 mmol/L) blood glucose targets.

Setting: The setting for this study was four academic hospital intensive care units.

Patients: This study included critically ill adults requiring intravenous insulin.

Intervention: Intervention used in this study was a bedside computerized protocol for managing blood glucose.

Main Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations.

Results: The number of patients was 31 to 458 and the number of blood glucose measurements was 2,226 to 19,925 among the four intensive care units. Clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations was 91% to 98%. Blood glucose distributions were similar in the four hospitals (generalized linear model p = .18). Compared with the simple guideline, eProtocol-insulin glucose measurements within target increased from 21% to 39%, and mean blood glucose decreased from 142 to 115 mg/dL (generalized linear model p < .001). Compared with the paper-based protocol, eProtocol-insulin glucose measurements within target increased from 28% to 42%, and mean blood glucose decreased from 134 to 116 mg/dL (generalized linear model p = .001).

Conclusions: The 91% to 98% clinician compliance indicates eProtocol-insulin is an exportable instrument that can establish a replicable experimental method for clinical trials of blood glucose management in critically ill adults. Control of blood glucose was better with eProtocol-insulin than with a simple clinical guideline or a paper-based protocol.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.