Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2008 - Volume 36 - Issue 5 > Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rescue for cardiopulmona...
Critical Care Medicine:
May 2008 - Volume 36 - Issue 5 - pp 1607-1613
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170b82b
Pediatric Critical Care

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rescue for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric patients *

Lin, Fang-Yue MD, PhD; Ko, Wen-Je MD, PhD; Huang, Shu-Chien MD; Wu, En-Ting MD; Chen, Yih-Sharng MD, PhD; Chang, Chung-I MD; Chiu, Ing-Sh MD, PhD; Wang, Shoei-Shen MD, PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To describe survival and neurologic outcome and identify the factors associated with survival among pediatric patients following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: A university-affiliated tertiary care hospital.

Patients: Eligible patients were ≤18 yrs of age and received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Interventions: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was neurologic status after ECPR at hospital discharge and late follow-up. Good neurologic outcome was defined as Pediatric Cerebral Performance Categories 1, 2, and 3. Continuous variables were expressed as medians (interquartile range). We prospectively defined the early cohort (January 1999 to December 2001) and late cohort (January 2002 to January 2006) and compared the survival rates. We identified 27 ECPR events. The survival rate to hospital discharge was 41% (11 of 27). The nonsurvivors had higher pre-cardiopulmonary resuscitation serum lactate levels (14 [10.2-19.6] mmol/L vs. 8.5 [4.4-12.6] mmol/L, p < .01), longer durations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (60 [37-81] mins vs. 45 [25-50] mins, p < .05) with longer activating time for ECMO (12.5 [7.5-33.8] mins vs. 5 [0-10] mins, p < .01), and more renal failure after ECPR (68% [11 of 16] vs. 9% [1 of 11], p < .01). The survival rate of the late cohort was better than that of the early cohort (58% [11 of 19] vs. 0% [0 of 8], p < .05). By exact multiple logistic regression analysis, the early cohort and renal failure after ECPR were two independent risk factors for mortality. Among the 11 survivors, ten had good neurologic outcomes.

Conclusions: ECPR successfully rescued some pediatric patients who failed rescue with conventional in-hospital CPR. Good neurologic outcomes were achieved in the majority of the survivors. Early cohort and post-ECPR renal failure were associated with mortality.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.