Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2006 - Volume 34 - Issue 4 > Hemodynamic monitoring in obese patients: The impact of body...
Critical Care Medicine:
April 2006 - Volume 34 - Issue 4 - pp 1243-1246
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000208358.27005.F4
Brief Report

Hemodynamic monitoring in obese patients: The impact of body mass index on cardiac output and stroke volume *

Stelfox, Henry T. MD, PhD; Ahmed, Sofia B. MD, MMSc; Ribeiro, Rodrigo A. MD; Gettings, Elise M. RN; Pomerantsev, Eugene MD; Schmidt, Ulrich MD, PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: Interpreting hemodynamic parameters in critically ill obese patients can be difficult as the effects of body mass index (BMI) on cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) at the extremes of body size remains unknown. We examined the relationship between BMI and both CO and SV for patients with varying body sizes.

Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting: A large tertiary care academic medical center.

Patients: A total of 700 consecutive adults who were found to have disease-free coronary arteries and a cardiac output measurement (thermodilution or Fick method) during coronary angiography between July 1, 2000, and July 31, 2004.

Measurements and Results: We examined the relationship between BMI (mean, 28 kg/m2; range, 10.6-91.6 kg/m2) and cardiac hemodynamics after adjusting for demographic (age, sex) and clinical (diabetes, smoking status, valvular heart disease, medications, indications for catheterization) characteristics using multivariable regression. Body mass index was positively correlated with CO and SV. Each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 0.08 L/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.10; p < .001) increase in CO and 1.35 mL (95% CI, 0.96-1.74; p < .001) increase in SV. There was no significant association between BMI and both cardiac index (0.003 L/min/m2; 95% CI, -0.008-0.014; p = .571) and stroke volume index (0.17 mL/m2; 95% CI, -0.03-0.37; p = .094).

Conclusion: Variations in BMI translate into predictable but only modest differences in CO and SV, even at the extremes of body size. Indexing hemodynamic measurements to body surface area attenuates the effects of BMI. Body habitus should not appreciably complicate the interpretation of hemodynamic measurements.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.