Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2003 - Volume 31 - Issue 7 > Epidemiology and impact of aspiration pneumonia in patients...
Critical Care Medicine:
July 2003 - Volume 31 - Issue 7 - pp 1930-1937
Clinical Investigations

Epidemiology and impact of aspiration pneumonia in patients undergoing surgery in Maryland, 1999-2000

Kozlow, Jeffrey H. BA; Berenholtz, Sean M. MD; Garrett, Elizabeth PhD; Dorman, Todd MD; Pronovost, Peter J. MD, PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: The epidemiology of aspiration pneumonia and its impact on clinical and economic outcomes in surgical patients are poorly defined. We sought to identify preoperative patient characteristics and surgical procedures that are associated with an increased risk for aspiration pneumonia and to determine the clinical and economic impact in hospitalized surgical patients.

Design: Observational study using a state discharge database.

Setting: All hospitals in Maryland.

Patients: We obtained discharge data for 318,880 adult surgical patients in 52 Maryland hospitals from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2000.

Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome variable was a discharge diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics and surgical procedures associated with an increased risk for aspiration pneumonia and to determine the impact on intensive care unit admission, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and total hospital charges. The overall prevalence of aspiration pneumonia was 0.8%. The prevalence varied among hospitals (range, 0% to 1.9%) and by surgical procedure (range, <0.1% to 19.1%). Patient characteristics independently associated with an increased risk included: male sex, nonwhite race, age of >60 yrs vs. 18-29 yrs, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal disease, malignancy, moderate to severe liver disease, and emergency room admission. In patients undergoing procedures other than tracheostomy, aspiration pneumonia was independently associated with an increased risk for admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.1), in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 7.6; 95% confidence interval, 6.5-8.9), longer hospital length of stay (estimated mean increase of 9 days; 95% confidence interval, 8-10), and increased total hospital charges (estimated mean increase of $22,000; 95% confidence interval, $19,000-$25,000).

Conclusions: Aspiration pneumonia occurs in approximately 1% of surgical patients and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs of care. Given that the rate of aspiration pneumonia varies among hospitals, we can improve the quality and reduce the costs of care by implementing strategies to reduce the rate of aspiration pneumonia.

Patients who develop aspiration pneumonia have increased morbidity, mortality and costs of care (1). Surgical patients, especially those requiring general anesthesia, may be at particularly high risk (2, 3). The prevalence of, risk factors for, and impact of aspiration pneumonia remains unclear (2-16). Most studies of aspiration pneumonia identified patients with aspiration from patient surveys or from databases of anesthetic complications and used data from a single institution (2-13, 15, 16), potentially limiting the accuracy and generalizability of the results. Because the risk for aspiration pneumonia can be reduced with relatively simple interventions, efforts to further understand the epidemiology and impact of aspiration pneumonia are important (17-22).

Surgical patients with aspiration pneumonia can be accurately identified using discharge data (23, 24). The specific aim of this study was to identify preoperative patient characteristics and surgical procedures that are associated with an increased risk for aspiration pneumonia and to determine the clinical and economic impact of aspiration pneumonia in adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery in Maryland from 1999 through 2000.

© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.