Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2002 - Volume 30 - Issue 1 > Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output...
Critical Care Medicine:
January 2002 - Volume 30 - Issue 1 - pp 52-58
Clinical Investigations

Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability

Gödje, Oliver MD, PhD; Höke, Kerstin MD; Goetz, Alwin E. MD, PhD; Felbinger, Thomas W. MD; Reuter, Daniel A. MD; Reichart, Bruno MD, PhD; Friedl, Reinhard MD; Hannekum, Andreas MD, PhD; Pfeiffer, Ulrich J. MD, PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: The method of determining continuous cardiac output (CO) with beat-to-beat pulse-contour analysis calibrated by transthoracic thermodilution is gaining much wider clinical acceptance. However, some questions have been raised regarding the reliability of this method during periods of profound hemodynamic instability. We validated the original calculation of pulse-contour analysis and a new, improved algorithm against thermodilution-derived measurements of CO in patients with changes of CO >20%.

Design: Comparative study.

Setting: Cardiac surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Patients: Twenty-four patients after cardiac surgery who experienced changes of CO >±20% during their postoperative course.

Interventions: CO was measured by transthoracic thermodilution and pulse-contour analysis (PiCCO, PULSION Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) at serial intervals every 60 mins during study periods of 8-44 hrs. During this time, no recalibration of the pulse-contour computer was performed.

Measurements and Main Results: A total of 517 simultaneous measurements of thermodilution CO and pulse-contour CO measured by the two different algorithms were compared by regression, structural regression, and Bland-Altman analyses. Mean change of CO was 40% ± 27% (range, 20% to 139%), range of systemic vascular resistance was 450-2360 dyne·sec/cm5. Correlation of the original pulse-contour algorithm to thermodilution CO was r = .76, with p = .027; bias was 0.08 L/min, with 1.8 L/min single sd. Correlation of the improved pulse-contour algorithm to thermodilution CO was r = .88, with p = .0001; bias was 0.2 L/min, with 1.2 L/min single sd. Mean CO by the new pulse-contour algorithm did not differ significantly from CO by thermodilution during the study period. The difference between the methods was not influenced by variations of heart rate or arterial pressure.

Conclusions: CO measurement by arterial pulse-contour analysis based on a new, improved algorithm is reliable, even in patients with profound changes of CO and during periods of hemodynamic instability.

© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.