Critical Care Medicine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2000 - Volume 28 - Issue 11 > Cardiopulmonary resuscitation without ventilation
Critical Care Medicine:
November 2000 - Volume 28 - Issue 11 - pp N186-N189
Scientific Reviews

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation without ventilation

Kern, Karl B. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Current resuscitation methods, although occasionally effective, rarely perform as well as initially anticipated. Some of the disappointment can be attributed to the difficulty of the task for many, including both professional and lay first responders. Significant attention has been paid recently to the need to simplify both the technique and the teaching of resuscitation. In considering simplification of the current resuscitation scheme, a logical start is an honest reappraisal of the importance and priorities of each of the once sacrosanct ABCs, specifically, establishment of an Airway, artificial Breathing (mouth-to-mouth breathing), and chest compressions for temporary Circulation.

Experimental data continue to accumulate indicating that most important within this triad is circulation. Adequate oxygen exists within the blood during at least the first 10 mins of cardiac arrest. If circulation is provided to distribute such oxygen, no survival disadvantage results with chest compression-only basic life support (BLS) efforts. Even a totally occluded airway during the first 6 mins of cardiac arrest does not compromise survival if reasonable circulation is provided with chest compressions.

Clinical studies support the same conclusion that what most influences survival in any BLS effort is circulation, not ventilation. Belgium investigators have shown equal survival rates among those treated with chest compressions plus ventilation and those who received chest compressions alone. Telephone dispatcher-guided BLS cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has likewise shown no survival disadvantage to chest compression-only CPR when compared with telephone-guided standard BLS CPR.

Based on this reasoning, a new simplified BLS method has been proposed. Staged CPR consists of a strategy to initially teach laypersons a simplified approach to BLS, which requires only chest compressions and not mouth-to-mouth breathing. Bronze CPR, in which chest compression-only BLS is taught, was compared with the standard European Resuscitation Council BLS course for laypersons. Manikin exit testing at course completion has revealed significant advantages of the simplified approach compared with standard CPR courses for the lay public.

© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.