Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Rapid Response Team Implementation and In-Hospital Mortality*

Salvatierra, Gail RN, PhD; Bindler, Ruth C. RN, PhD; Corbett, Cynthia RN, PhD; Roll, John PhD; Daratha, Kenn B. PhD

doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000347
Feature Articles

Objective: To determine the relationship between implementation of rapid response teams and improved mortality rate using a large, uniform dataset from one state in the United States.

Design: This observational cohort study included 471,062 adult patients hospitalized between 2001 and 2009.

Setting: Ten acute tertiary care hospitals in Washington State.

Patients or Other Participants: Hospital abstract records on adult patients (18 years old or older) were examined (n = 471,062). Patients most likely to benefit from rapid response team interventions were included and other prognostic factors of severity of illness and comorbidities were controlled. Each participating hospital provided the implementation date of their rapid response team intervention. Mortality rates in 31 months before rapid response team implementation (pre–rapid response team time period) were compared with mortality rates in 31 months following rapid response team implementation (post–rapid response team time period).

Intervention(s): Implementation of a rapid response team within each acute tertiary care hospital.

Measurements and Main Results: In-hospital mortality. Relative risk for in-hospital mortality improved in the post-rapid response team time period compared with the pre-rapid response team time period (relative risk = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.72–0.80; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality improved in six of 10 acute tertiary care hospitals in the post-rapid response team time period when compared with the pre-rapid response team time period. Because of a long-term trend of decline in hospital mortality, these decreases could not be unambiguously attributed to rapid response team implementation. Further research should examine additional objective outcomes and optimal configuration of rapid response teams to maximize intervention effectiveness.

1College of Nursing, Seattle University, Seattle, WA.

2College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA.

3Providence Medical Research Center, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane, WA.

4Department of Medical Education and Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

* See also p. 2133.

This work was performed at College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA.

Dr. Corbett lectured for American Association of Colleges of Nursing and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (travel support and/or honoraria for presentations at conferences) and received support for the development of educational presentations from Postgraduate Healthcare Education (preparation of online continuing education). Her institution received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Health Sciences and Services Authority of Spokane County, and National Science Foundation (NSF) (current or pending [NSF] grant support on other projects). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

For information regarding this article, E-mail: salvatig@seattleu.edu

Copyright © by 2014 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.