Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2014 - Volume 42 - Issue 9 > Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Observational Comparative Effe...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000403
Clinical Investigations

Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research in Patients With Septic Shock*

Bradford, Mark A. MD1; Lindenauer, Peter K. MD, MSc2,3,4; Wiener, Renda Soylemez MD, MPH1,5,6; Walkey, Allan J. MD, MSc1

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the importance of including do-not-resuscitate status in critical care observational comparative effectiveness research.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: All California hospitals participating in the 2007 California State Inpatient Database, which provides do-not-resuscitate status within the first 24 hours of admission.

Patients: Septic shock present at admission.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: We investigated the association of early do-not-resuscitate status with in-hospital mortality among patients with septic shock. We also examined the strength of confounding of do-not-resuscitate status on the association between activated protein C therapy and mortality, an association with conflicting results between observational and randomized studies. We identified 24,408 patients with septic shock; 19.6% had a do-not-resuscitate order. Compared with patients without a do-not-resuscitate order, those with a do-not-resuscitate order were significantly more likely to be older (75 ± 14 vs 67 ± 16 yr) and white (62% vs 53%), with more acute organ failures (1.44 ± 1.15 vs 1.38 ± 1.15), but fewer inpatient interventions (1.0 ± 1.0 vs 1.4 ± 1.1). Adding do-not-resuscitate status to a model with 47 covariates improved mortality discrimination (c-statistic, 0.73–0.76; p < 0.001). Addition of do-not-resuscitate status to a multivariable model assessing the association between activated protein C and mortality resulted in a 9% shift in the activated protein C effect estimate toward the null (odds ratio from 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62–0.99], p = 0.04, to 0.85 [0.67–1.08], p = 0.18).

Conclusions: Among patients with septic shock, do-not-resuscitate status acts as a strong confounder that may inform past discrepancies between observational and randomized studies of activated protein C. Inclusion of early do-not-resuscitate status into more administrative databases may improve observational comparative effectiveness methodology.

© 2014 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.