Critical Care Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2014 - Volume 42 - Issue 1 > Effect of Oropharyngeal Povidone-Iodine Preventive Oral Care...
Text sizing:
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2770f
Feature Articles

Effect of Oropharyngeal Povidone-Iodine Preventive Oral Care on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Severely Brain-Injured or Cerebral Hemorrhage Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial*

Seguin, Philippe MD, PhD1,2,3; Laviolle, Bruno MD, PhD3,4,5; Dahyot-Fizelier, Claire MD, PhD6,7,8; Dumont, Romain MD9; Veber, Benoit MD10; Gergaud, Soizic MD11; Asehnoune, Karim MD, PhD9; Mimoz, Olivier MD, PhD6,7,8; Donnio, Pierre-Yves PharmD12,13; Bellissant, Eric MD, PhD3,4,5; Malledant, Yannick MD1,2,3; for the Study of Povidone Iodine to Reduce Pulmonary Infection in Head Trauma and Cerebral Hemorrhage Patients (SPIRIT) ICU Study and AtlanRéa Groups

Collapse Box


Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral care with povidone-iodine on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a high-risk population.

Design: A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, two-parallel-group trial performed between May 2008 and May 2011.

Setting: Six ICUs in France.

Patients: One hundred seventy-nine severely brain-injured patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) or cerebral hemorrhage expected to be mechanically ventilated for more than 24 hours.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive oropharyngeal care with povidone-iodine (n = 91) or placebo (n = 88) six times daily until mechanical ventilation withdrawal.

Measurements and Main Results: Primary endpoint was the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Secondary endpoint included the rates of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome and patient’s outcome. The number of patients evaluable for the primary endpoint (preplanned modified intention-to-treat population) was 150 (78 in the povidone-iodine group, 72 in the placebo group). Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurred in 24 patients (31%) in the povidone-iodine group and 20 (28%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.67–1.82]; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the two groups for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: eight patients (10%) in the povidone-iodine group and five patients (7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.51–4.31]; p = 0.47). Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in five patients in the povidone-iodine group but not in the placebo group (p = 0.06). There was no difference between groups for ICU and hospital lengths of stay, as well as ICU and 90-day mortality.

Conclusions: There is no evidence to recommend oral care with povidone-iodine to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in high-risk patients. Furthermore, this strategy seems to increase the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

© 2014 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.