Critical Care Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2014 - Volume 42 - Issue 1 > Advanced Airway Management Simulation Training in Medical Ed...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829a721f
Review Articles

Advanced Airway Management Simulation Training in Medical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kennedy, Cassie C. MD, FCCP1; Cannon, Eric K. MD2; Warner, David O. MD2; Cook, David A. MD, MHPE, FACP3

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box


Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on teaching airway management using technology-enhanced simulation.

Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible articles through May 11, 2011.

Study Selection: Observational or controlled trials instructing medical professionals in direct or fiberoptic intubation, surgical airway, and/or supraglottic airway using technology-enhanced simulation were included. Two reviewers determined eligibility.

Data Extraction: Study quality, instructional design, and outcome data were abstracted independently and in duplicate.

Data Synthesis: Of 10,904 articles screened, 76 studies were included (n = 5,226 participants). We used random effects meta-analysis to pool results. In comparison with no intervention, simulation training was associated with improved outcomes for knowledge (standardized mean difference, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.19–1.35]; n = 7 studies) and skill (1.01 [0.68–1.34]; n = 28) but not for behavior (0.52 [–0.30 to 1.34]; n = 4) or patient outcomes (–0.12 [–0.41 to 0.16]; n = 4). In comparison with nonsimulation interventions, simulation training was associated with increased learner satisfaction (0.54 [0.37–0.71]; n = 2), improved skills (0.64 [0.12–1.16]; n = 5), and patient outcomes (0.86 [0.12–1.59]; n = 3) but not knowledge (0.29 [–0.28 to 0.86]; n = 4). We found few comparative effectiveness studies exploring how to optimize the use of simulation-based training, and these revealed inconsistent results. For example, animal models were found superior to manikins in one study (p = 0.004) using outcome of task speed but inferior in another study in terms of skill ratings (p = 0.02). Five studies comparing simulators of high versus low technical sophistication found no significant difference in skill outcomes (p > 0.31). Limitations of this review include heterogeneity (I2 > 50% for most analysis) and variation in quality among primary studies.

Conclusions: Simulation-based airway management curriculum is superior to no intervention and nonsimulation intervention for important education outcomes. Further research is required to fine-tune optimal curricular design.

© 2014 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.