Objectives: To compare the quality of care delivered to critically ill and injured children receiving telemedicine, telephone, or no consultation in rural emergency departments.
Design: Retrospective chart review with concurrent surveys.
Setting and Participants: Three hundred twenty patients presenting in the highest triage category to five rural emergency departments with access to pediatric critical care consultations from an academic children’s hospital.
Measurements and Main Results: Quality of care was independently rated by two pediatric emergency medicine physicians applying a previously validated 7-point implicit quality review tool to the medical records. Quality was compared using multivariable linear regression adjusting for age, severity of illness, and temporal trend. Referring physicians were surveyed to evaluate consultation-related changes in their care. Parents were also surveyed to evaluate their satisfaction and perceived quality of care. In the multivariable analysis, with the no-consultation cohort as the reference, overall quality was highest among patients who received telemedicine consultations (n = 58; β = 0.50 [95% CI, 0.17–0.84]), intermediate among patients receiving telephone consultation (n = 63; β = 0.12 [95% CI, −0.14 to 0.39]), and lowest among patients receiving no consultation (n = 199). Referring emergency department physicians reported changing their diagnosis (47.8% vs 13.3%; p < 0.01) and therapeutic interventions (55.2% vs 7.1%; p < 0.01) more frequently when consultations were provided using telemedicine than telephone. Parent satisfaction and perceived quality were significantly higher when telemedicine was used, compared with telephone, for six of the seven measures.
Conclusions: Physician-rated quality of care was higher for patients who received consultations with telemedicine than for patients who received either telephone or no consultation. Telemedicine consultations were associated with more frequent changes in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and higher parent satisfaction, than telephone consultations.
1Department of Pediatrics, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
2Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
3Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
4Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
5Department of Family Practice and Community Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
6Department of Surgery, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
7Department of Public Health Sciences, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
* See also p. 2455.
Supported, in part, by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ 1 K08 HS 13179-01), Emergency Medical Services for Children (HRSA H34MC04367-01-00), the California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF 02-2210), and the William Randolph Hearst Foundations.
Drs. Dharmar, Romano, Kuppermann, Cole, Andrada, Vance, Harvey, and Marcin received grant support from AHRQ, HRSA-EMSC, California Healthcare Foundation, and William Randolph Hearst Foundations. Drs. Nesbitt and Vance disclosed that thy do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Address requests for reprints to: Madan Dharmar, MBBS, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Children’s Hospital, 2516 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817. E-mail: email@example.com