Critical Care Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2012 - Volume 40 - Issue 8 > A controlled trial of electronic automated advisory vital si...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d9a0
Clinical Investigations

A controlled trial of electronic automated advisory vital signs monitoring in general hospital wards*

Bellomo, Rinaldo MD, FRACP, FCICM; Ackerman, Michael RN, PhD; Bailey, Michael PhD, MSc; Beale, Richard MB, BS, MD, FRCA; Clancy, Greg RN, MSN; Danesh, Valerie PhD; Hvarfner, Andreas MD, PhD; Jimenez, Edgar MD; Konrad, David MD, PhD; Lecardo, Michele RN, BSN, CCRN; Pattee, Kimberly S. RN, BSN; Ritchie, Josephine RN; Sherman, Kathie RN; Tangkau, Peter MD; The Vital Signs to Identify, Target, and Assess Level of Care Study (VITAL Care Study) Investigators

Collapse Box


Objectives: Deteriorating ward patients are at increased risk. Electronic automated advisory vital signs monitors may help identify such patients and improve their outcomes.

Setting: A total of 349 beds, in 12 general wards in ten hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Australia.

Patients: Cohort of 18,305 patients.

Design: Before-and-after controlled trial.

Intervention: We deployed electronic automated advisory vital signs monitors to assist in the acquisition of vital signs and calculation of early warning scores. We assessed their effect on frequency, type, and treatment of rapid response team calls; survival to hospital discharge or to 90 days for rapid response team call patients; overall type and number of serious adverse events and length of hospital stay.

Measurements and Main Results: We studied 9,617 patients before (control) and 8,688 after (intervention) deployment of electronic automated advisory vital signs monitors. Among rapid response team call patients, intervention was associated with an increased proportion of calls secondary to abnormal respiratory vital signs (from 21% to 31%; difference [95% confidence interval] 9.9 [0.1–18.5]; p = .029). Survival immediately after rapid response team treatment and survival to hospital discharge or 90 days increased from 86% to 92% (difference [95% confidence interval] 6.3 [0.0–12.6]; p = .04). Intervention was also associated with a decrease in median length of hospital stay in all patients (unadjusted p < .0001; adjusted p = .09) and more so in U.S. patients (from 3.4 to 3.0 days; unadjusted p < .0001; adjusted ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.03 [1.00–1.06]; p = .026). The time required to complete and record a set of vital signs decreased from 4.1 ± 1.3 mins to 2.5 ± 0.5 mins (difference [95% confidence interval] 1.6 [1.4–1.8]; p < .0001).

Conclusions: Deployment of electronic automated advisory vital signs monitors was associated with an improvement in the proportion of rapid response team-calls triggered by respiratory criteria, increased survival of patients receiving rapid response team calls, and decreased time required for vital signs measurement and recording (NCT01197326).

© 2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.