Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Standardized postoperative handover process improves outcomes in the intensive care unit: A model for operational sustainability and improved team performance*

Agarwal, Hemant S. MBBS; Saville, Benjamin R. PhD; Slayton, Jennifer M. RN; Donahue, Brian S. MD, PhD; Daves, Suanne MD; Christian, Karla G. MD; Bichell, David P. MD; Harris, Zena L. MD

doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182514bab
Clinical Investigations

Objective: To determine whether structured handover tool from operating room to pediatric cardiac intensive care unit following cardiac surgery is associated with a reduction in the loss of information transfer and an improvement in the quality of communication exchange. In addition, whether this tool is associated with a decrease in postoperative complications and an improvement in patient outcomes in the first 24 hrs of pediatric cardiac intensive care unit stay.

Design: Prospective observational clinical study.

Setting: Pediatric cardiac intensive care unit of an academic medical center.

Patients: Pediatric cardiac surgery patients over a 3-yr period. Evaluation of communication and patients studied for two time periods: verbal handover (July 2007–June 2009) and structured handover (July 2009–June 2010).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: Two anonymous surveys administered to the entire clinical team of the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit evaluated loss of information transfer for each of the two handover processes. Quality of structured handover tool was evaluated by Likert scale (1–5) responses in the second survey. Patient complications including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mediastinal reexploration, placement on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, development of severe metabolic acidosis, and number of early extubations in the first 24-hr pediatric cardiac intensive care unit stay were compared for the two time periods. Survey results showed the general opinion that the structured handover tool was of excellent quality to enhance communication (Likert scale: 4.4 ± 0.7). In addition, the tool was associated with a significant reduction (p < .001) in loss of information for every category of patient clinical care including patient, preoperative, anesthesia, operative, and postoperative details and laboratory values. Patient data revealed significant decrease (p < .05) for three of the four major complications studied and a significant increase (p < .04) in the number of early extubations following introduction of our standardized handover tool.

Conclusions: In this setting, a standardized handover tool is associated with a decrease in the loss of patient information, an improvement in the quality of communication during postoperative transfer, a decrease in postoperative complications, and an improvement in 24-hr patient outcomes.

From the Departments of Pediatrics (HSA, JMS, ZLH), Anesthesiology (BSD, SD), Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (KGC, DPB), Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN; and the Department of Biostatistics (BRS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

*See also p. 2245.

The authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.

For information regarding this article, E-mail: Hemant.Agarwal@Vanderbilt.edu

© 2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins