Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2012 - Volume 40 - Issue 2 > Humane terminal extubation reconsidered: The role for preem...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228235d
Point of View Article

Humane terminal extubation reconsidered: The role for preemptive analgesia and sedation*

Billings, J. Andrew MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Patient comfort is not assured by common practices for terminal extubation. Treatment guidelines suggest minimizing dosage of opioids and sedatives. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that clinicians are limited in their ability to recognize distress in such patients and tend to undermedicate patients in distress. Yet suffering of any significant degree should be unacceptable. For painful procedures, such as surgery, the analogous practice of postponing anesthesia until the patient evidences discomfort would never be tolerated. Waiting for signs of suffering before initiating excellent analgesia and sedation inexorably subjects patients to distress. Therefore, when death is inevitable and imminent after extubation, suffering should be anticipated, concerns about respiratory depression dismissed, and vigorous preemptive deep sedation or anesthesia provided.

© 2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.