Critical Care Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2011 - Volume 39 - Issue 3 > A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator asse...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b
Laboratory Investigations

A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators*

Dickson, Robert P. MD; Hotchkin, David L. MD, MS; Lamm, Wayne J. E. MA; Hinkson, Carl RRT; Pierson, David J. MD; Glenny, Robb W. MD, MA; Rubinson, Lewis MD, PhD

Collapse Box


Objectives: To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios.

Design: Prospective, experimental animal study.

Setting: University research laboratory.

Subjects: Twelve adult pigs.

Interventions: Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden).

Measurements and Main Results: Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr).

Conclusions: We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.

© 2011 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.