Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2011 - Volume 39 - Issue 1 > Take Heart America: A comprehensive, community-wide, systems...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa7ce4
Clinical Investigations

Take Heart America: A comprehensive, community-wide, systems-based approach to the treatment of cardiac arrest*

Lick, Charles J. MD; Aufderheide, Tom P. MD; Niskanen, Robert A. MSEE; Steinkamp, Janet E. MA; Davis, Scott P. MD, FCCM; Nygaard, Susan D. RN; Bemenderfer, Kim K. NREMT-I; Gonzales, Louis EMT-P; Kalla, Jeffrey A. NREMT-P; Wald, Sarah K. BA; Gillquist, Debbie L. EMT-P; Sayre, Michael R. MD; Oski Holm, Susie Y. MPH; Oakes, Dana A. BS; Provo, Terry A. EMT-P; Racht, Ed M. MD; Olsen, John D. MD; Yannopoulos, Demetris MD; Lurie, Keith G. MD

Erratum

Erratum

In the article on page 26 of the January 2011 issue, one of the author's names was not correct.

The author should be listed as follows: Susie Y. Osaki Holm

Critical Care Medicine. 39(4):930, April 2011.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: To determine out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates before and after implementation of the Take Heart America program (a community-based initiative that sequentially deployed all of the most highly recommended 2005 American Heart Association resuscitation guidelines in an effort to increase out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival).

Patients: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Anoka County, MN, and greater St. Cloud, MN, from November 2005 to June 2009.

Interventions: Two sites in Minnesota with a combined population of 439,692 people (greater St. Cloud and Anoka County) implemented: 1) widespread cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills training in schools and businesses; 2) retraining of all emergency medical services personnel in methods to enhance circulation, including minimizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruptions, performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and after single-shock defibrillation, and use of an impedance threshold device; 3) additional deployment of automated external defibrillators in schools and public places; and 4) protocols for transport to and treatment by cardiac arrest centers for therapeutic hypothermia, coronary artery evaluation and treatment, and electrophysiological evaluation.

Measurements and Main Results: More than 28,000 people were trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use in the two sites. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates increased from 20% to 29% (p = .086, odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 0.96–2.89). Three cardiac arrest centers were established, and hypothermia therapy for admitted out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims increased from 0% to 45%. Survival to hospital discharge for all patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in these two sites improved from 8.5% (nine of 106, historical control) to 19% (48 of 247, intervention phase) (p = .011, odds ratio 2.60, confidence interval 1.19–6.26). A financial analysis revealed that the cardiac arrest centers concept was financially feasible, despite the costs associated with high-quality postresuscitation care.

Conclusions: The Take Heart America program doubled cardiac arrest survival when compared with historical controls. Study of the feasibility of generalizing this approach to larger cities, states, and regions is underway.

© 2011 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.