Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2010 - Volume 38 - Issue 2 > The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Results of an international g...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc
Special Article

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis*

Levy, Mitchell M. MD; Dellinger, R Phillip MD; Townsend, Sean R. MD; Linde-Zwirble, Walter T.; Marshall, John C. MD; Bion, Julian MD; Schorr, Christa RN, MSN; Artigas, Antonio MD; Ramsay, Graham MD; Beale, Richard MD; Parker, Margaret M. MD; Gerlach, Herwig MD, PhD; Reinhart, Konrad MD; Silva, Eliezer MD; Harvey, Maurene RN, MPH; Regan, Susan PhD; Angus, Derek C. MD, MPH; on behalf of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or “the Campaign”) developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations.

Design and Setting: A multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the intensive care unit, emergency department, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the United States, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were “bundled” into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 hrs and within 24 hrs. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008.

Subjects: A total of 15,022 subjects.

Measurements and Main Results: Data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 yrs (p < .0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 yrs (p = .008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37% to 30.8% over 2 yrs (p = .001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 yrs (95% confidence interval, 2.5–8.4).

Conclusions: The Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts.

© 2010 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.