Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2010 - Volume 38 - Issue 1 > A multicenter, randomized trial of noninvasive ventilation w...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b78abe
Clinical Investigations

A multicenter, randomized trial of noninvasive ventilation with helium-oxygen mixture in exacerbations of chronic obstructive lung disease*

Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio MD, PhD; Richard, Jean-Christophe M. MD, PhD; Abroug, Fekri MD; Diehl, Jean Luc MD; Antonelli, Massimo MD; Sauder, Philippe MD; Mancebo, Jordi MD; Ferrer, Miquel MD; Lellouche, Francois MD, PhD; Lecourt, Laurent Pharm D; Beduneau, Gaetan MD; Brochard, Laurent MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of a helium-oxygen mixture on intubation rate and clinical outcomes during noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Seven intensive care units.

Patients: A total of 204 patients with known or suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute dyspnea, Paco2> 45 mm Hg and two among the following factors: pH <7.35, Paco2 <50 mm Hg, respiratory rate >25/min.

Interventions: Noninvasive ventilation randomly applied with or without helium (inspired oxygen fraction 0.35) via a face mask.

Measurements and Main Results: Duration and complications of NIV and mechanical ventilation, endotracheal intubation, discharge from intensive care unit and hospital, mortality at day 28, adverse and serious adverse events were recorded. Follow-up lasted until 28 days since enrollment. Intubation rate did not significantly differ between groups (24.5% vs. 30.4% with or without helium, p = .35). No difference was observed in terms of improvement of arterial blood gases, dyspnea, and respiratory rate between groups. Duration of noninvasive ventilation, length of stay, 28-day mortality, complications and adverse events were similar, although serious adverse events tended to be lower with helium (10.8% vs. 19.6%, p = .08).

Conclusions: Despite small trends favoring helium, this study did not show a statistical superiority of using helium during NIV to decrease the intubation rate in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

© 2010 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.