Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2009 - Volume 37 - Issue 6 > The presence of a family witness impacts physician performan...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00818
Clinical Investigations

The presence of a family witness impacts physician performance during simulated medical codes

Fernandez, Rosemarie MD; Compton, Scott PhD; Jones, Kerin A. MD; Velilla, Marc Anthony MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the presence and behavior of a family witness to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) impacts critical actions performed by physicians.

Design: This was a randomized comparison study of physicians’ performance during a simulated cardiac arrest with three different family witness states.

Setting: This study was conducted at the Wayne State University Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Science’s Center for Healthcare Simulation.

Subjects: Second-year and third-year emergency medicine (EM) residents from the Wayne State University Department of Emergency Medicine–affiliated residency programs and Michigan State University–affiliated EM residency programs.

Intervention: Thirty teams comprised of one second-year and one third-year EM resident were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 1) no family witness; 2) a nonobstructive “quiet” family witness; and 3) a family witness displaying an overt grief reaction.

Measurements and Main Results: Each pair was assessed for time to critical actions (e.g., minutes to CPR and drug administration) and for resuscitation-based performance outcomes (e.g., number of shocks) during a simulated cardiac arrest. The time to critical events was similar across groups with respect to initiating CPR, attempting to intubate the patient, and pronouncing the death of the patient. However, the time to deliver the first defibrillation shock was longer for the overt reaction witness group (2.57 minutes) as compared with the quiet (1.77 minutes) and no family witness (1.67 minutes) groups. Additionally, fewer total shocks were delivered in the overt reaction witness groups (4.0 minutes) vs. the quiet (6.5 minutes) and no family witness groups (6.0 minutes).

Conclusion: The presence of a family witness may have a significant impact on physicians’ ability to perform critical actions during simulated medical resuscitations. Further study is necessary to see if this effect crosses over into real clinical practice and if training ameliorates this effect.

© 2009 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.