Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2006 - Volume 34 - Issue 10 > End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensiv...
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239233.63425.1D
Continuing Medical Education Article

End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey*

Nelson, Judith E. MD, JD; Angus, Derek C. MD, ChB, MPH; Weissfeld, Lisa A. PhD; Puntillo, Kathleen A. RN, DNSc, FAAN; Danis, Marion MD; Deal, David BS; Levy, Mitchell M. MD, FCCM; Cook, Deborah J. MD, MSc (Epid), FRCPC; for the Critical Care Peer Workgroup of the Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care Project

Continued Medical Education
Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: One in five Americans dies following treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), and evidence indicates the need to improve end-of-life care for ICU patients. We conducted this study to elicit the views and experiences of ICU directors regarding barriers to optimal end-of-life care and to identify the type, availability, and perceived benefit of specific strategies that may improve this care.

Design: Self-administered mail survey.

Setting: Six hundred intensive care units.

Participants: A random, nationally representative sample of nursing and physician directors of 600 adult ICUs in the United States.

Interventions: Mail survey.

Measurements and Main Results: We asked participants about barriers to end-of-life care (1 = huge to 5 = not at all a barrier), perceived benefit of strategies to improve end-of-life care, and availability of these strategies. From 468 ICUs (78.0% of sample), 590 ICU directors participated (406 nurses [65.1% response] and 184 physicians [31.7% response]). Respondents had a mean of 16.6 yrs (sd 7.6 yrs) of ICU experience. Important barriers to better end-of-life care included patient/family factors, including unrealistic patient/family expectations 2.5 (1.0), inability of patients to participate in discussions 2.7 (0.9), and lack of advance directives 2.9 (1.0); clinician factors, which included insufficient physician training in communication 2.9 (1.1) and competing demands on physicians’ time 3.0 (1.1); and institution/ICU factors, such as suboptimal space for family meetings 3.5 (1.2) and lack of a palliative care service 3.4 (1.2). More than 80% of respondents rated 14 of 14 strategies as likely to improve end-of-life care, including trainee role modeling by experienced clinicians, clinician training in communication and symptom management, regular meetings of senior clinicians with families, bereavement programs, and end-of-life care quality monitoring. However, few of these strategies were widely available.

Conclusions: Intensive care unit directors perceive important barriers to optimal end-of-life care but also universally endorse many practical strategies for quality improvement.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to:

1. Describe barriers to improved end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.

2. List strategies that are likely to improve end-of-life care.

3. Use this information in the clinical setting.

All authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships with or interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.

Lippincott CME Institute, Inc., has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interest regarding this educational activity.

Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information on obtaining continuing medical education credit.

© 2006 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.