Critical Care Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2006 - Volume 34 - Issue 3 > Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Res...
Text sizing:
Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201896.45809.E3
Feature Articles

Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study*

Sakr, Yasser MB, BCh, MSc; Reinhart, Konrad MD, PhD; Vincent, Jean-Louis MD, PhD, FCCP; Sprung, Charles L. MD; Moreno, Rui MD, PhD; Ranieri, V Marco MD; De Backer, Daniel MD, PhD; Payen, Didier MD

Collapse Box


Objective: The optimal adrenergic support in shock is controversial. We investigated whether dopamine administration influences the outcome from shock.

Design: Cohort, multiple-center, observational study.

Setting: One hundred and ninety-eight European intensive care units.

Patients: All adult patients admitted to a participating intensive care unit between May 1 and May 15, 2002.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: Patients were followed up until death, until hospital discharge, or for 60 days. Shock was defined as hemodynamic compromise necessitating the administration of vasopressor catecholamines. Of 3,147 patients, 1,058 (33.6%) had shock at any time; 462 (14.7%) had septic shock. The intensive care unit mortality rate for shock was 38.3% and 47.4% for septic shock. Of patients in shock, 375 (35.4%) received dopamine (dopamine group) and 683 (64.6%) never received dopamine. Age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were comparable between the two groups. The dopamine group had higher intensive care unit (42.9% vs. 35.7%, p = .02) and hospital (49.9% vs. 41.7%, p = .01) mortality rates. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed diminished 30 day-survival in the dopamine group (log rank = 4.6, p = .032). In a multivariate analysis with intensive care unit outcome as the dependent factor, age, cancer, medical admissions, higher mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, higher mean fluid balance, and dopamine administration were independent risk factors for intensive care unit mortality in patients with shock.

Conclusions: This observational study suggests that dopamine administration may be associated with increased mortality rates in shock. There is a need for a prospective study comparing dopamine with other catecholamines in the management of circulatory shock.

© 2006 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.