Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation

Kollef, Marin H. MD; Shapiro, Steven D. MD; Silver, Patricia MEd; St. John, Robert E. MSN; Prentice, Donna MSN; Sauer, Sharon BSN; Ahrens, Tom S. DNS; Shannon, William PhD; Baker-Clinkscale, Darnetta MBA

Feature Article

Objective  To compare a practice of protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses and respiratory therapists with traditional physician-directed weaning.

Design  Randomized, controlled trial.

Setting  Medical and surgical intensive care units in two university-affiliated teaching hospitals.

Patients  Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 357).

Interventions  Patients were randomly assigned to receive either protocol-directed (n = 179) or physician-directed (n = 178) weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Measurements and Main Results  The primary outcome measure was the duration of mechanical ventilation from tracheal intubation until discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Other outcome measures included need for reintubation, length of hospital stay, hospital mortality rate, and hospital costs. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 35 hrs for the protocol-directed group (first quartile 15 hrs; third quartile 114 hrs) compared with 44 hrs for the physician-directed group (first quartile 21 hrs; third quartile 209 hrs). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients randomized to protocol-directed weaning had significantly shorter durations of mechanical ventilation compared with patients randomized to physician-directed weaning (chi squared = 3.62, p = .057, log-rank test; chi squared = 5.12, p = .024, Wilcoxon test). Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, adjusting for other covariates, showed that the rate of successful weaning was significantly greater for patients receiving protocol-directed weaning compared with patients receiving physician-directed weaning (risk ratio 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.50; p = .039). The hospital mortality rates for the two treatment groups were similar (protocol-directed 22.3% vs. physician-directed 23.6%; p = .779). Hospital cost savings for patients in the protocol-directed group were $42,960 compared with hospital costs for patients in the physician-directed group.

Conclusion  Protocol-guided weaning of mechanical ventilation, as performed by nurses and respiratory therapists, is safe and led to extubation more rapidly than physician-directed weaning. (Crit Care Med 1997; 25:567-574)

From the Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Kollef and Shapiro), and the Division of General Medical Sciences (Dr. Shannon), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; the Departments of Nursing and Respiratory Therapy (Ms. Silver, Mr. St. John, Ms. Prentice, Mrs. Sauer, Mr. Ahrens, and Ms. Baker-Clinkscale), Barnes and Jewish Hospitals of the Barnes-Jewish-Christian Hospitals Health System, St. Louis, MO.

Supported, in part, by a grant from the Barnes-Jewish-Christian Hospitals Innovation in Healthcare Program.

Address requests for reprints to: Marin H. Kollef, MD, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8052, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110.

© Williams & Wilkins 1997. All Rights Reserved.