Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2007 - Volume 50 - Issue 4 > Comparison of the Efficacies of Five Different Statins on In...
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology:
doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318123767f
Short Communication

Comparison of the Efficacies of Five Different Statins on Inhibition of Human Saphenous Vein Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Invasion

Turner, Neil A PhD*; Midgley, Lynne*; O'Regan, David J MD, FRCS†; Porter, Karen E PhD*

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the *Academic Unit of Cardiovascular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics (LIGHT), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; and †Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Yorkshire Heart Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

Received for publication April 20, 2007; accepted May 18, 2007.

This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation, Research Councils UK. NAT is in receipt of a Research Councils UK Academic Fellowship.

The authors state that they have no financial interest in the products mentioned within this article.

Reprints: Dr. Karen E. Porter, PhD, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK (e-mail: medkep@leeds.ac.uk).

Collapse Box

Abstract

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) exhibit beneficial effects on the vasculature independently of their cholesterol-lowering properties. These pleiotropic effects underlie the ability of statins to reduce intimal hyperplasia in saphenous vein (SV) bypass grafts by attenuating smooth muscle cell (SMC) invasion and proliferation. Although all statins can effectively lower cholesterol, the pleiotropic effects of individual statins may well differ. We therefore compared the concentration-dependent effects of 4 lipophilic statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin) and 1 hydrophilic statin (pravastatin) on the proliferation and invasion of SMC cultured from SV of 9 different patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The lipophilic statins inhibited SV-SMC proliferation over a 4-day period with an order of potency of fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > lovastatin (IC50 range = 0.07 to 1.77 μM). Similarly, these statins also inhibited SV-SMC invasion through an artificial basement membrane barrier (fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin ≫ lovastatin; IC50 range = 0.92 to 26.9 μM). In contrast, the hydrophilic pravastatin had no significant effect on SV-SMC proliferation at concentrations up to 10 μM, nor did it attenuate SV-SMC invasion (up to 30 μM). Our data provide strong evidence that individual statins possess differential pleiotropic effects on SV-SMC function. This may be of clinical relevance in the selection of individual statins for the treatment of CABG patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are a class of drugs prescribed to individuals at risk of coronary heart disease. In addition to their primary function of lowering plasma cholesterol levels, statins also have beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system through lipid-independent mechanisms.1 These are referred to collectively as pleiotropic effects and arise independently of effects on cholesterol synthesis, predominantly via inhibition of small GTPases (eg, Ras and Rho). These G-proteins are extensively implicated in the mechanism of a diversity of cardiovascular pathologies2,3 and inhibition of Ras/Rho underlies many of the cholesterol-independent effects of statins on the vascular wall.4-6

There is increasing clinical evidence that statins can reduce the incidence of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) occlusion in saphenous vein (SV) conduits, effects that are independent of cholesterol levels.7-9 Indeed, statin therapy can retard the progression of vein graft disease and reduce the need for repeat revascularization procedures.10 The underlying pathology of SV graft occlusion is intimal hyperplasia (IH), a process initiated by endothelial damage during vein harvesting and implantation. The resultant increase in expression of inflammatory mediators such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) induces matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9 activity, which permits intimally directed smooth muscle cell (SMC) invasion and proliferation.11,12 We5,13,14 and others4,15-18 have demonstrated using organ-cultured human SV or SV-derived SMC cultures that statins reduce neointima formation, MMP-9 secretion, and SV-SMC invasion and proliferation.

Although all statins effectively lower cholesterol, the pleiotropic effects of individual statins may well differ.19,20 Given the potential clinical implications of statin pleiotropy, it is therefore important to compare the direct cellular effects of these compounds in addition to their lipid-lowering properties. In the present study, we investigated the concentration-dependent effects of 4 lipophilic statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin) and 1 hydrophilic statin (pravastatin) on modulation of human SV-SMC proliferation and invasion.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Materials

Cell culture reagents were purchased from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK) with the exception of fetal calf serum (FCS), which was from Biosera Ltd (Ringmer, UK). PDGF-BB and IL-1α were from Sigma (Poole, UK), and statin sodium salts were purchased from Calbiochem (Nottingham, UK).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cell Culture

Samples of SV were obtained from a total of 9 separate patients undergoing elective CABG surgery at the Leeds General Infirmary. Local ethical committee approval and informed patient consent were obtained. SV-SMC were cultured from explants of SV tissue and characterized as described previously.13 Cells were maintained at 37°C in full growth medium (Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium containing 10% FCS) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. All experiments were performed using SV-SMC of passage number 3-4.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Proliferation Assays

Cell proliferation assays were performed essentially as described previously.13 Briefly, SV-SMC from 5 different patients were seeded into 24-well cell culture plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in full growth medium. Cells were incubated overnight and then quiesced in serum free medium for 3 days before transfer to full growth medium (10% FCS) containing 5 different statins at a range of concentrations. All statins were tested on cells from each individual patient. Medium and drugs were replaced after 2 days, and viable cell numbers were determined in triplicate wells after 4 days using Trypan Blue and a hemocytometer. The increase in cell number was calculated by subtracting the starting cell number (day 0) from the final cell number (day 4). Data were then normalized to control values (no statin) to correct for differences in proliferation rates between cells from different patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Invasion Assays

SV-SMC invasion was assessed using a modified Boyden chamber technique with polycarbonate membrane pores occluded with Matrigel basement membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK), as we have described previously.13 Cells (1 × 105) from 4 different patients were loaded in the upper chamber in medium supplemented with 0.4% FCS with or without statins at the appropriate concentrations. All 5 statins at 3 concentrations were tested in parallel on cells from each different patient. The lower chamber contained 0.4% FCS supplemented with chemoattractant (10 ng/mL PDGF-BB plus 10 ng/mL IL-1α). After incubation for 24 h at 37°C in a tissue culture incubator, duplicate membranes were processed and evaluated by counting cells in 10 random fields under high power (×400) light microscopy.13 Data were normalized to the number of invaded cells in control wells (ie, in the absence of statin).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM with n representing the number of experiments on cells from different patients. Curves were fitted to proliferation and invasion data using nonlinear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism software, www.graphpad.com), and IC50 values were calculated as the concentration of statin causing a 50% reduction in proliferation/invasion.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Effect of Statins on SV-SMC Proliferation

SV-SMC were plated at equal densities, quiesced, and then exposed to 10% FCS (maximal growth stimulus) alone or supplemented with simvastatin (0.3 to 3 μM), atorvastatin (0.03 to 1 μM), fluvastatin (0.03 to 0.3 μM), lovastatin (1 to 10 μM), or pravastatin (1 to 10 μM) for 4 days before determining changes in cell number by counting viable cells. The 4 lipophilic statins inhibited FCS-induced proliferation with an order of potency of fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > lovastatin (Fig. 1A). The concentration of statin that elicited a 50% reduction in cell number (IC50 values) ranged from 0.07 μM for fluvastatin to 1.77 μM for lovastatin (Table 1). In contrast to the lipophilic statins, the hydrophilic pravastatin had no significant effect on SV-SMC proliferation at concentrations up to 10 μM (Fig. 1A).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Effect of Statins on SV-SMC Invasion

The effects of the same 5 statins on PDGF/IL-1-induced invasion through a Matrigel basement membrane barrier were then investigated (Fig. 1B). The lipophilic statins inhibited SV-SMC invasion with the same order of potency observed in the proliferation assays (fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > lovastatin); IC50 values ranged from 0.92 μM for fluvastatin to 26.9 μM for lovastatin (Table 1). Pravastatin had no effect on SV-SMC invasion, even at concentrations up to 30 μM (Fig. 1B).

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

We determined the concentration-dependent effects of 5 different statins on human SV-SMC proliferation and invasion; important events in the development of neointimal lesions in SV bypass grafts. The order of potency of the lipophilic statins was identical for both aspects of SMC function with fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > lovastatin, whereas the hydrophilic pravastatin had no effect. For both assays, the difference in efficacy between fluvastatin and lovastatin was approximately 25-fold to 30-fold. In contrast to the lipophilic statins, which can enter cells by passive diffusion, hydrophilic statins such as pravastatin (and rosuvastatin) are unable to penetrate the plasma membrane of most cell types, with the exception of hepatic cells, whose membranes contain specific transporters for uptake of such hydrophilic substances.21 One would therefore predict that although hydrophilic statins would reduce cholesterol synthesis in the liver, they would exhibit reduced pleiotropic effects on the vasculature. Indeed, fluvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin all reduced neointimal formation in normocholesterolaemic rabbits after carotid artery restriction, whereas pravastatin was without significant effect.22 Similar findings were reported in a rabbit atheroma model.23 However, some more recent in vivo6,24 and clinical studies25,26 have reported beneficial effects of hydrophilic statins (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) on IH; therefore hydrophilicity alone may not fully predict the pleiotropic effects of statins.

Our proliferation data are in keeping with previous reports that have demonstrated that lipophilic, but not hydrophilic, statins inhibit vascular SMC proliferation.17,27 The IC50 values calculated from our proliferation studies compared favorably with the manufacturers' Cmax values for different statins quoted in the study of Corpateaux and colleagues (1 μM for simvastatin, atorvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin; 0.1 μM for fluvastatin).16 However, in contrast to our findings, these authors reported that pravastatin (10 μM) could reduce neointima formation in organ-cultured SV15 and inhibit SV-SMC proliferation and invasion16 to the same extent as lipophilic statins, although the reasons for these differences are not clear.

In our invasion assay, cells must first degrade a Matrigel basement membrane barrier before undergoing chemotaxis towards a PDGF/IL-1 stimulus. Statins can potentially modulate this process in at least 2 distinct ways: (1) by inhibiting MMP-9 secretion; and (2) by reducing chemotaxis. It has been previously reported that several statins can reduce human SV-SMC migration in the absence of a Matrigel barrier (chemotaxis) by approximately 50%.16 Additionally, we have demonstrated that simvastatin and atorvastatin, but not lovastatin or pravastatin, can inhibit phorbol ester-induced MMP-9 secretion in human SV-SMC.5 Thus, the relatively low efficacy of lovastatin in inhibiting SV-SMC invasion compared with other lipophilic statins may be due to its inability to effectively reduce MMP-9 secretion. In our experiments, pravastatin had no effect on SV-SMC invasion, consistent with our findings on cell proliferation.

A particular strength of our study was the use of human SV-SMC, the exact cell type that causes the clinical problem of SV graft stenosis. Moreover, by examining concentration-response profiles of 5 different statins on both SV-SMC proliferation and invasion, we have gained important insights into the differential pleiotropic effects of members of this class of drugs. The IC50 values for the lipophilic statins were consistently lower for cell proliferation than invasion. This may be due to the nature of our proliferation assay protocol, in which statins were added on 2 separate occasions over a 4-day period, compared with a single addition for the 24-hour invasion assay. Another explanation is that cell proliferation may be more sensitive to changes in small GTPase activity than cellular invasion.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

Lipophilic statins inhibited both proliferation and invasion of human SV-SMC with the same order of potency (fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > lovastatin), whereas hydrophilic pravastatin had no significant effect. These pleiotropic effects of statins on SV-SMC function likely underlie their ability to reduce SV graft occlusion. Given the widespread prescribing of statins, it may be necessary to consider not only the lipid-lowering but also the pleiotropic properties of individual statins for optimal treatment of CABG patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Liao JK, Laufs U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:89-118.

2. Chien KR, Hoshijima M. Unravelling Ras signals in cardiovascular disease. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:807-808.

3. Shimokawa H, Takeshita A. Rho-kinase is an important therapeutic target in cardiovascular medicine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1767-1775.

4. Laufs U, Marra D, Node K, et al. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors attenuate vascular smooth muscle proliferation by preventing Rho GTPase-induced down-regulation of p27Kip1. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:21926-21931.

5. Turner NA, O'Regan DJ, Ball SG, et al. Simvastatin inhibits MMP-9 secretion from human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the RhoA/ROCK pathway and reducing MMP-9 mRNA levels. FASEB J. 2005;19:804-806.

6. Yamanouchi D, Banno H, Nakayama M, et al. Hydrophilic statin suppresses vein graft intimal hyperplasia via endothelial cell-tropic Rho-kinase inhibition. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:757-764.

7. Christenson JT. Preoperative lipid control with simvastatin protects coronary artery bypass grafts from obstructive graft disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:896-899.

8. Christenson JT. Preoperative lipid control with simvastatin reduces the risk for graft failure already 1 year after myocardial revascularization. Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;9:33-43.

9. Werba JP, Tremoli E, Massironi P, et al. Statins in coronary bypass surgery: rationale and clinical use. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:2132-2140.

10. Lazar HL. Role of statin therapy in the coronary bypass patient. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:730-740.

11. Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. The biology of saphenous vein graft occlusion: etiology and strategies for prevention. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1994;9:641-649.

12. Jeremy JY, Gadsdon P, Shukla N, et al. On the biology of saphenous vein grafts fitted with external synthetic sheaths and stents. Biomaterials. 2007;28:895-908.

13. Porter KE, Naik J, Turner NA, et al. Simvastatin inhibits human saphenous vein neointima formation via inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:150-157.

14. Porter KE, Turner NA. Statins for the prevention of vein graft stenosis: a role for inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30:120-126.

15. Corpataux JM, Naik J, Porter KE, et al. A comparison of six statins on the development of intimal hyperplasia in a human vein culture model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:177-181.

16. Corpataux JM, Naik J, Porter KE, et al. The effect of six different statins on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of human smooth muscle cells. J Surg Res. 2005;129:52-56.

17. Nègre-Aminou P, van Vliet AK, van Erck M, et al. Inhibition of proliferation of human smooth muscle cells by various HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors; comparison with other human cell types. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1345:259-268.

18. Yang Z, Kozai T, van der LB, et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibition improves endothelial cell function and inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation in human saphenous veins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1691-1697.

19. Chong PH. Lack of therapeutic interchangeability of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:1907-1917.

20. Mason RP. Molecular basis of differences among statins and a comparison with antioxidant vitamins. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:34P-41P.

21. Yamazaki M, Suzuki H, Hanano M, et al. Na+-independent multispecific anion transporter mediates active transport of pravastatin into rat liver. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:G36-G44.

22. Soma MR, Donetti E, Parolini C, et al. HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. In vivo effects on carotid intimal thickening in normocholesterolemic rabbits. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:571-578.

23. Fukumoto Y, Libby P, Rabkin E, et al. Statins alter smooth muscle cell accumulation and collagen content in established atheroma of watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001;103:993-999.

24. Schafer K, Kaiser K, Konstantinides S. Rosuvastatin exerts favourable effects on thrombosis and neointimal growth in a mouse model of endothelial injury. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93:145-152.

25. Mulder HJ, Bal ET, Jukema JW, et al. Pravastatin reduces restenosis two years after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (REGRESS trial). Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:742-746.

26. Kamishirado H, Inoue T, Sakuma M, et al. Effects of statins on restenosis after coronary stent implantation. Angiology. 2007;58:55-60.

27. Corsini A, Raiteri M, Soma M, et al. Simvastatin but not pravastatin inhibits the proliferation of rat aorta myocytes. Pharmacol Res. 1991;23:173-180.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 17 time(s).

Blood Purification
Novel Insights into the Pathobiology of the Vascular Access - Do They Translate into Improved Care?
Diskin, CJ
Blood Purification, 29(2): 216-229.
10.1159/000245650
CrossRef
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Efficacy of Simvastatin Treatment of Valvular Interstitial Cells Varies With the Extracellular Environment
Monzack, EL; Gu, XX; Masters, KS
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 29(2): 246-253.
10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179218
CrossRef
American Heart Journal
Lipophilicity and cardiovascular outcome in patients with CHF
Ford, JS; Tayek, JA
American Heart Journal, 156(2): .
ARTN e7
CrossRef
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Targeting Redox Signaling in the Vascular Wall: From Basic Science to Clinical Practice
Antoniades, C; Antonopoulos, AS; Bendall, JK; Channon, KM
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 15(3): 329-342.

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Atorvastatin extends the therapeutic window for tPA to 6 h after the onset of embolic stroke in rats
Zhang, L; Chopp, M; Jia, LF; Cui, YS; Lu, M; Zhang, ZG
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 29(): 1816-1824.
10.1038/jcbfm.2009.105
CrossRef
International Heart Journal
Comparison of Atorvastatin and Simvastatin in Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Successful Cardioversion
Naji, F; Suran, D; Kanic, V; Vokac, D; Sabovic, M
International Heart Journal, 50(2): 153-160.

British Journal of Pharmacology
Fluvastatin inhibits expression of the chemokine MDC/CCL22 induced by interferon-gamma in HaCaT cells, a human keratinocyte cell line
Qi, XF; Kim, DH; Yoon, YS; Li, JH; Jin, D; Teng, YC; Kim, SK; Lee, KJ
British Journal of Pharmacology, 157(8): 1441-1450.
10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00311.x
CrossRef
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Statins for community-acquired pneumonia: current state of the science
Viasus, D; Garcia-Vidal, C; Gudiol, F; Carratala, J
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 29(2): 143-152.
10.1007/s10096-009-0835-0
CrossRef
Translational Research
Targeting the airway smooth muscle for asthma treatment
Camoretti-Mercado, B
Translational Research, 154(4): 165-174.
10.1016/j.trsl.2009.06.008
CrossRef
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Lipophilic but not hydrophilic statins selectively induce cell death in gynaecological cancers expressing high levels of HMGCoA reductase
Kato, S; Smalley, S; Sadarangani, A; Chen-Lin, K; Oliva, B; Branes, J; Carvajal, J; Gejman, R; Owen, GI; Cuello, M
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 14(5): 1180-1193.
10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00771.x
CrossRef
Journal of Biological Chemistry
c-Jun Regulates Shear- and Injury-inducible Egr-1 Expression, Vein Graft Stenosis after Autologous End-to-Side Transplantation in Rabbits, and Intimal Hyperplasia in Human Saphenous Veins
Ni, J; Waldman, A; Khachigian, LM
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(6): 4038-4048.
10.1074/jbc.M109.078345
CrossRef
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Simvastatin Protects against the Development of Endometriosis in a Nude Mouse Model
Bruner-Tran, KL; Osteen, KG; Duleba, AJ
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 94(7): 2489-2494.
10.1210/jc.2008-2802
CrossRef
Intensive Care Medicine
Comment on "Statin administration did not influence the progression of lung injury or associated organ failures in a cohort of patients with acute lung injury"
Shyamsundar, M; Craig, T; O'Kane, C; McAuley, D
Intensive Care Medicine, 35(8): 1494-1495.
10.1007/s00134-009-1506-4
CrossRef
Gefasschirurgie
Local drug delivery onto and into vessels. "Drug releasing devices"
Larena-Avellaneda, A; Dittmann, G; Siegel, R; Haacke, C; Debus, ES
Gefasschirurgie, 13(2): 107-+.
10.1007/s00772-008-0590-z
CrossRef
Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology
Understanding the pathophysiology of hemodialysis access problems as a prelude to developing innovative therapies
Diskin, CJ; Stokes, TJ; Dansby, LM; Radcliff, L; Carter, TB
Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 4(): 628-638.
10.1038/ncpneph0947
CrossRef
Angiology
Effects of Atorvastatin on Vascular Intimal Hyperplasia: An Experimental Rodent Model
Aydin, U; Ugurlucan, M; Gungor, F; Ziyade, S; Inan, B; Banach, M; Kalko, Y; Yasar, T
Angiology, 60(3): 370-377.
10.1177/0003319708321102
CrossRef
Rheumatology
Statins inhibit C-reactive protein-induced chemokine secretion, ICAM-1 upregulation and chemotaxis in adherent human monocytes
Montecucco, F; Burger, F; Pelli, G; Poku, NK; Berlier, C; Steffens, S; Mach, F
Rheumatology, 48(3): 233-242.
10.1093/rheumatology/ken466
CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

smooth muscle cells; human; statin; proliferation; invasion; intimal hyperplasia

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Follow Us!

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.