Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2000 - Volume 36 - Issue 6 > Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction in the Cardiac Allograft: Imp...
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology:
Articles

Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction in the Cardiac Allograft: Impact of Different Immunosuppressive Regimens

Weis, Michael*; Wildhirt, Stephen M.†; Schulze, Costas†; Pehlivanli, Sinan*; Rieder, Gabriele‡; Wolf, Wolf P.*; Wilbert-Lampen, Ute*; Meiser, Bruno M.†; Enders, Georg‡; von Scheidt, Wolfgang*

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

*Medizinische Klinik I, †Herzchirurgische Klinik, and ‡Institut für Chirurgische Forschung, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Received April 10, 2000; revision accepted September 18, 2000.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Weis at Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Falk Cardiovascular Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5406, U.S.A. E-mail: mweis@stanford.edu

Collapse Box

Abstract

Immunosuppression may have an important impact on early graft coronary endothelial injury. We investigated functional and morphologic coronary alterations, myocardial expression, and cardiac release of possible mediators of allograft vasculopathy within 6 months after cardiac transplantation with respect to different immunosuppressive regimens. Epicardial and microvascular endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasomotor function and epicardial intimal thickening were measured in 8 transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin A (CyA), azathioprine, and prednisone (group 1), 9 transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (TKL), azathioprine, and prednisone (group 2), and 14 patients treated with TKL, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (group 3). The gene expressions of inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (iNOS and eNOS), endothelin-1, prostacyclinsynthase, and thromboxansynthase were analyzed in endomyocardial biopsy specimens using semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Transcardiac cytokine release, endothelin-1, and nitrate-release were determined from plasma samples. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction (vasocon-striction to acetylcholine > 10%) and microvascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction (flow velocity increase to adenosine and nifedipine < 2.0) were enhanced in heart transplant recipients immunosuppressed with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone. The prevalence of epicardial dysfunction was 78% in group 2 versus 44% and 46% in group 1 and 3 (p < 0.05), respectively. The prevalence of microvascular dysfunction was 56% in group 2 versus 13% and 7% in group 1 and 3 (p < 0.02), respectively. Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was associated with increased myocardial iNOS expression (p < 0.05), decreased eNOS expression (p < 0.05), and enhanced cardiac immunoreactive interleukin-6 (p < 0.01). Coronary intimal thickening was not different between the groups. The combination of TKL and MMF appears to be superior to TKL and azathioprine (and comparable to CyA and azathioprine) concerning preservation of early coronary vasomotor function, eNOS expression, iNOS suppression as well as cardiac interleukin-6 release. This may have an important impact on subsequent development of transplant coronary atherosclerosis.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains a serious long-term complication of heart transplantation and is the major cause of death in patients surviving 1 year after transplantation (1). Several experimental models suggest that immunologic mechanisms operating in a milieu of non-immunologic risk factors constitute the principal stimuli that result in progressive myointimal hyperplasia (1,2). Repetitive alterations of the allograft endothelial barrier result in response to injury mechanisms leading to endothelial activation and dysfunction (2). Damage to the endothelium may alter various physiologic endothelial functions, predisposing the coronary artery to inflammation, thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and vascular smooth muscle cell growth. Recently, Davis et al. (3) demonstrated that early endothelial dysfunction (15 ± 3 days after transplantation) predicts the development of intravascular ultrasound-visible cardiac allograft vasculopathy at 1 year after heart transplantation. Using a predictive model for adverse cardiac events from cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a cohort of 107 consecutive heart transplant recipients Mehra et al. (4) detected a prognostic impact of immunosuppression and cellular rejection on cardiac allograft vasculopathy. A higher daily cyclosporine (CyA) dose was found to be protective against adverse cardiac events, whereas a greater prednisone consumption was substantially deleterious. Thus quality and quantity of immunosuppressive medication may have an impact on development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (5). Recently, clinical trials with TKL and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been started in clinical cardiac transplantation (6,7). TKL appears to exert its effects through a molecular mechanism of action similar to that of CyA but has been suggested to be more potent, presumably by inhibiting cytokine synthesis by T cells infiltrating the allograft (7). MMF, an antimetabolite derived from mycophenolic acid with antiproliferative properties, was shown to prolong cardiac allograft survival, induce donor-specific tolerance, and reverse ongoing acute cellular rejection in rodent and primate models (7). However, the effects of TKL and MMF on coronary endothelial function and subsequent development of human cardiac allograft vasculopathy are unknown.

The present study was designed to investigate functional (epicardial and microvascular endothelial function) and morphologic (epicardial intimal thickening) coronary alterations within 6 months after cardiac transplantation with respect to different immunosuppressive regimens. We hypothesized that coronary endothelial dysfunction in the transplanted heart is mediated by alterations in endothelium-derived and inducible vasoactive factors and cytokines. Thus gene expression of vasoactive mediators as well as transcardiac cytokine, endothelin-1, and nitrate release were determined.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Patient selection

This study was performed in the early, stable postoperative phase (1-6 months after transplantation). The 31 orthotopic heart transplant recipients were selected according to predefined exclusion criteria including acute infection or rejection episode (≥grade 1b according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation) and impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 1.8 mg/dl). University of Wisconsin or Celsior-solution was used for allograft preservation (Table 1). No induction therapy with antibody preparations was performed. In the first 17 patients the immunosuppressive protocol was randomized TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone versus CyA, azathioprine, and prednisone. Since August 1996 all patients in our institution received TKL, MMF, and prednisone as a standard immunosuppressive regimen. All TKL-treated patients received the drug i.v. for the first 2-3 postoperative days followed by oral dosing, targeting TKL trough levels of 13-15 ng/ml. MMF was administered orally after extubation at a dose of 2 g/day. The patients were divided in three groups corresponding to their individual immunosuppressive protocol. Group 1 consisted of eight transplant recipients treated with CyA, azathioprine, and prednisone. Group 2 consisted of nine transplant recipients treated with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone. Group 3 consisted of 14 patients treated with TKL, MMF, and prednisone. Importantly, no significant differences were noted with respect to donor age, ischemic time, cytomegalovirus, and HLA-mismatch, whereas the number of treated rejection episodes was significantly reduced in group 3 (Table 1). The investigation was performed with approval by the institutional ethics committee and all patients gave written informed consent to the investigation performed during the routinely scheduled cardiac catheterization. The investigation conforms with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients were in the fasting state for at least 12 h and all vasoactive drugs were discontinued 12 h before the investigation.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Methods

Right heart catheterization. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed through the percutaneous jugular venous approach for the detection of acute rejection. Two additional myocardial biopsies were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for molecular investigations. A 7-Fr multipurpose catheter was then placed in the coronary sinus and 20-ml blood samples were withdrawn for determination of cardiac cytokines, endothelin-1, and nitrate release.

Left heart catheterization. After the diagnostic procedure including left ventriculography and coronary angiography, a Doppler flow-wire (FloWire, Cardiometrics Inc., Mountain View, CA, U.S.A.), was placed in the proximal left anterior descending or circumflex artery, permitting measurement of coronary blood flow velocities. Five thousand internation units of heparin were given intravenously. During baseline conditions, the position of the Doppler flow-wire was adjusted to optimize the audio flow-velocity signal and the phasic flow-velocity waveform. Doppler flow-wire positions were not changed thereafter. Intracoronary blood flow velocity and arterial pressure were recorded continuously at baseline and during administration of the study agents. First, the endothelium independent agent adenosine was infused into the left coronary system at different dose levels (80 and 160 μg/min over 5 min each) to achieve maximal (endothelium-independent) coronary flow. Second, the endothelium-dependent agent acetylcholine (Acetylcholine, Dispersa, Germering, Germany), was infused into the left coronary system (1 and 30 μg/min over 5 min each) to investigate epicardial and microvascular endothelial function. At the end of the protocol, nifedipine (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) was administered (0.2 mg i.c.) to achieve maximal epicardial coronary artery vasodilatation. At the end of each infusion, coronary arteriography was performed with a biplane imaging system in a right and left oblique position with adequate cranial or caudal angulation for optimal analysis of the left coronary tree on end-diastolic frames. Position was kept constant during the protocol. Throughout each infusion, heart rate, arterial pressure, coronary flow velocity, and electrocardiogram were monitored continuously and documented on videotape for additional off-line analysis. All measurements were recorded in steady-state conditions. For determination of transcardiac cytokines, endothelin-1, and nitrate-release, aortic blood samples (20 ml) were withdrawn.

Coronary flow reserve. The coronary flow velocity reserve as a marker of microvascular integrity was determined by the ratio of the maximal coronary flow velocity (cm/s) after pharmacologic stimulation to the basal flow velocity. Coronary microvascular smooth muscle dysfunction was defined as coronary flow velocity reserve <2 in response to adenosine and nifedipine to exclude an isolated adenosine-defect (8). Coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined as coronary flow velocity reserve <2 in response to acetylcholine.

Quantitative coronary angiography. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed to investigate epicardial vasomotor response using a computerized automatic-analysis system (HICOR, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Nonstenotic proximal and distal coronary arterial segments identified between easily visualized branch points were selected for analysis in the anterior descending or circumflex artery. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as >10% diameter reduction in response to acetylcholine compared with baseline. Epicardial smooth muscle cell dysfunction was defined as <10% diameter increase in response to nifedipine. The prevalence of pathologic findings in the proximal and distal coronary parts was determined and mean values were calculated.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Intravascular ultrasound

Immediately after Doppler flow measurement, intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) was performed to detect intimal hyperplasia not visible with angiography. Before intravascular positioning, 200 μg of nitroglycerin were injected into the left coronary artery. The imaging system consisted of a 30-MHz ultrasound transducer enclosed within an acoustic housing on the tip of a 2.9-Fr flexible, rapid-exchange catheter (CVIS Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, U.S.A.). The catheter was advanced to the distal left anterior descending or circumflex artery, with careful observance of a lumen-ICUS catheter diameter ratio of >1.5. During the subsequent standardized pullback maneuver, images were documented on SVHS videotape for further off-line-analysis. The three sites with the most severe intimal proliferation were evaluated quantitatively concerning the radial and circumferential extent of intimal hyperplasia, and the averaged maximal intimal thickness was calculated. Averaged mean intimal thickness was determined using a minimum of 5 randomized proximal to distal coronary sites (9).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Myocardial molecular investigations

RNA extraction and cDNA preparation. Samples were homogenized with OMNI 2000 (SLB, Gauting, Germany) in 600 μl of lysis buffer (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany). Insoluble material was separated from the lysate by centrifugation at 10,000g for 3 min. Total RNA was extracted from the supernatant using spin columns with a selective binding silica-based membrane (RNeasy Kit, Qiagen). Total RNA was quantified by measuring the optical density at 260 nm and was confirmed by gel electrophoresis. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was prepared from 2 μg of total RNA in 30 μl reverse transcription buffer (Gibco BRL, Paisley, U.K.) supplemented with 0.6 mM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany), 32 U RNase inhibitor (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), 400 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT; Gibco BRL), 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 1.5 μM p(dt)15 primer (Boehringer) at 37°C for 60 min. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was heat-inactivated for 10 min at 95°C.

Polymerase chain reaction procedure. An aliquot (3 μl) of cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer 480, Cetus Corp., Norwalk, CT, U.S.A.). The amplification reaction was carried out in a total volume of 50 μl of PCR buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl, 50 mM KCl, 200 μM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP, 400 nM each of 3′ and 5′ primers, and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer). PCR amplification of cDNA was performed with specific primers for endothelin-1 (MWG, Ebersberg, Germany), inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthases (iNOS and eNOS) (MWG), prostacyclinsynthase, and thromboxansynthase (kindly provided by Professor V. Ulrich, Konstanz, Germany). The primers (Table 2) were designed such that the expected products were only obtained from cDNA, but not from genomic DNA.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

The PCR reaction mixture was covered with 25 μl of light mineral oil (Sigma Chemie, Deisenhofen, Germany). After 1 min predenaturation at 94°C, the PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 62°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. To ensure detection of low-abundance mRNA, 35 amplification cycles were performed. A sample (10 μl) of each amplified product was subjected to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.), stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by ultraviolet illumination. To determine the amount of PCR product, we used a semiquantitative scoring scheme that was based on visual assessment of photographic negatives of ethidium bromide agarose gels. This standardized method, previously described and validated (10) has been optimized for the semiquantitative measurement of inducible mRNA transcripts from multiple samples and can be used to discern at least fourfold differences in the transcription or quantity of a given mRNA. The semiquantitative grades were scored by two independent; blinded observers. The reaction cycles of PCR were performed in the range that demonstrated a linear correlation between the amount of cDNA and the yield of PCR products. Each signal was normalized for the DNA standard of the same gel to account for variances between gels. Normalization for the house-keeping gene GAPDH was performed to account for the variability of sample quality.

Cytokine assay technique. Serum levels (coronary sinus and aortic blood samples) of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-6 were measured by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) (Medgenix GmbH, Ratingen, Germany). Soluble IL-2R, soluble TNF-R-p55 and -p75 were measured by Cobas Core (Hoffmann La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with enzyme-linked immunologic assay (ELISA).

Endothelin-1 radioimmunoassay. Measurement of endothelin-1 has been described in detail elsewhere (11). In brief, blood samples were immediately placed on ice, centrifuged, and stored at −80°C until they were assayed. Endothelin-1 was extracted through Sep-Pak C18 cartridges washed with 10 mL 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and eluted with 5 mL 60% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA. For radioimmunoassay, eluates were deep-frozen, dried and redissolved in RIA buffer. Endothelin-1 antibody 2428 (Medor, Herrsching, Germany) was added to samples and standards (binding characteristics: endothelin-1, 100%; endothelin-2, 73%; endothelin-3, 31%; Big endothelin-1, 13%) for radioimmunoassay.

Griess reaction. Total nitrate-nitrite levels were measured by Griess reaction. The stable end products of nitric oxide generation were assayed by spectrophotometric analysis at 540 nm after reduction of nitrite to nitrate with nitrate reductase as described in detail elsewhere (12).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical analysis

Differences in group means were compared by ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey's test. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z test was used for nonparametric analysis. Significant differences in the prevalence of pathologic findings were examined using χ2 test. A probability value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. All data are expressed as mean ± SD.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Coronary functional alterations

Table 3 summarizes the epicardial and microvascular endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) and endothelium-independent vasomotor responses (adenosine). Epicardial endothelium-dependent vasomotor response was significantly reduced in patients treated with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone (Fig. 1). In line, the prevalence of epicardial endothelial vasomotor dysfunction (>10% vasoconstriction to acetylcholine) was pronounced in the patient group treated with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone as shown in Figure 2A (prevalence of epicardial dysfunction 78% in group 2 versus 44% [χ2 4,2; p < 0.05] and 46% [χ2 4,4; p < 0.05] in group 1 and 3, respectively). No significant differences in epicardial endothelium-independent response (Fig. 2B) were observed between the groups.

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools

Microvascular endothelium-independent vasomotor response (but not endothelial response) was diminished in patients treated with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone (Fig. 3). Prevalence of microvascular endothelial dysfunction was comparable between the groups (Fig. 4A), whereas the prevalence of pathologic microvascular endothelium-independent vasomotion (flow increase to adenosine <2.0) was markedly enhanced in the TKL- and azathioprine-treated group (56% vs 13% [χ2 5,7; p < 0.02] and 7% [χ2 6,7; p < 0.01] in group 1 and 3, respectively) as indicated in Figure 4B.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Coronary morphologic alterations

No differences could be observed concerning extent of coronary intimal thickening (Table 4), suggesting a comparable extent and distribution pattern of donor-transmitted disease among the groups in the early phase after transplantation.

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
mRNA gene expression of vasoactive mediators

Intramyocardial mRNA transcript levels for vasoactive enzymes are shown in Figure 5. Highest signals for iNOS mRNA were detected in recipients immunosuppressed with TKL and azathioprine (expression grade 2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 1 in recipients treated with CyA-based and TKL+MMF-based immunosuppression, respectively; p < 0.05), whereas eNOS mRNA expression was significantly decreased in the TKL and azathioprine-treated group (1.2 ± 1 vs. 2.3 ± 0.5 and 2.5 ± 0.9 in CyA-based and TKL+MMF-based group, respectively; p < 0.05). No differences were found in prostacyclinsynthase or thromboxansynthase mRNA signal intensity, whereas endothelin-1 mRNA expression tended to be elevated in the TKL + azathioprine group (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Cardiac cytokine pattern

No difference was measurable in cardiac cytokine production between the groups despite cardiac IL-6 production, which was elevated in TKL and azathioprine-treated recipients compared with CyA and azathioprine-treated recipients (6 ± 6 pg/ml vs. −5 ± 4 pg/ml; p <0.01) (Table 5). Transcardiac IL-6 release was detectable in 100% of patients treated with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone, whereas IL-6 release was detectable in only 20% and 50% from groups 1 and 3, respectively (p < 0.025). The prevalence of cardiac net release of IL-2R, TNF-α, and TNF-αR was similar between the groups.

Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Transcardiac endothelin-1 and nitrate gradient

Cardiac endothelin-1 release was not measurable in any patient, suggesting endothelin-1 net extraction by the heart. Cardiac nitrate release was similar between groups (Table 6).

Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

The major finding of the present study is a significantly higher prevalence of epicardial endothelial and microvascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction in heart transplant recipients immunosuppressed with TKL, azathioprine, and prednisone, associated with increased iNOS expression, decreased eNOS expression, and increased cardiac IL-6 release, compared with both other immunosuppressive regimens.

Epicardial endothelial dysfunction contributes to ischemic manifestations of coronary artery disease. Moreover, endothelial dysfunction may extend to the coronary microcirculation, where no overt atheroma develop but where coronary blood flow, and hence myocardial perfusion, is regulated. Microvascular dysfunction may therefore contribute importantly to ischemic consequences of coronary artery disease, even in the absence of significant epicardial stenoses (13,14). Indeed, the endothelium is not only a target but also a mediator of atherosclerosis, and coronary endothelial dysfunction is considered a pivotal initial step in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (13).

Cyclosporin A has been shown to impair endothelial and smooth muscle cell function in animal experiments (15), but conflicting results have been reported in humans (16,17). Noteworthy, Stroes et al. (18) demonstrated that acute administration of CyA enhances both basal- and receptor-stimulated endothelial nitric oxide activity. Thus endothelium-derived nitric oxide constitutes an important counterregulating mechanism that protects against CyA-associated (likely endothelin-mediated) vasoconstriction in vivo. This potential endothelium-protective mechanism has not yet been described for TKL. It is unclear whether a direct (dose-dependent) pharmacologically induced endothelial/smooth muscle cell effect or a mechanism concerning the NOS pathway is responsible for the TKL-induced changes in coronary function as detected in the present study. Importantly, an increased suppression of NOS induction in smooth muscle cells by CyA when compared with TKL has been demonstrated (19,20). In the present study highest amounts of iNOS mRNA (with potential nitric oxide-mediated cytotoxic side effects) and lowest amounts of eNOS gene expression were detectable in the TKL and azathioprine-treated group, suggesting a possible link between enhanced iNOS expression, diminished eNOS expression, and endothelial dysfunction. Among possible explanations for the iNOS-mediated destructive influences on coronary endothelium are enhanced capacity of immune cells to injure (21) or the promotion of endothelial apoptotic cell loss (22). Although eNOS is constitutively expressed, both in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that its expression is subject to modest (but likely important) degrees of regulation (23). Several pathophysiologic factors have been shown to lower eNOS expression, such as exposure of cultured endothelial cells to TNF-α and hypoxia (23). Thus under proinflammatory conditions, a decrease in eNOS expression might have a significant impact on endothelial vasomotor regulation. In addition, other factors such as differences in cardiac cytokine expression (suppressed in a variable manner by different immunosuppressive agents) may also be of importance concerning changes in coronary endothelial function (24,25). In the present study we could demonstrate a significant cardiac IL-6 release only in patients treated with TKL and azathioprine, suggesting a sufficient inhibition on IL-6 activity by both other immunosuppressive regimens. It is known that TKL exerts only weak inhibitory effects on IL-6 activity in vitro and in vivo (26,27). Importantly, IL-6, as a predominantly T-cell-independent (macrophage-derived) cytokine, has been shown to induce specific changes in endothelial cell function and morphology and has been implicated in the development of sclerosis and fibrosis after renal transplantation (28-30).

Several groups investigated the influence of TKL on smooth muscle proliferation and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Allografted hearts treated with TKL showed more severe grade of cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared with grafted hearts treated with CyA (31,32). In contrast, a prospective clinical trial in heart transplantation demonstrated no significant difference in freedom from angiographically visible cardiac allograft vasculopathy between patients treated with TKL (n = 80) or CyA (n = 80) (6). However, in the latter study coronary functional measurements and intravascular ultrasound were not performed.

Besides TKL, the use of MMF has recently been introduced in clinical heart transplantation (33). In a randomized, prospective multicenter study, the combination of CyA and MMF was associated with a 35% reduction in 3-year mortality, mostly because of a decrease in cardiovascular mortality, compared with CyA, and azathioprine (34). MMF inhibits both T-cell-mediated and T-cell-independent pathways, decreases adhesion molecule activity, and diminishes cytokine synthesis (30,35), and hence, may protect endothelial function in specific immunologic settings. Here, we demonstrated that MMF in combination with TKL and prednisone diminished the extent of epicardial endothelial and microvascular smooth muscle dysfunction and suppressed the cardiac iNOS and IL-6 expression seen in transplant recipients immunosuppressed with TKL and azathioprine. Importantly, MMF-therapy has been associated with reduction in smooth muscle cell and endothelium cell proliferation (36). Thus a potential direct anti-atherosclerotic action by MMF, in vivo, may delay the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

The most important limitation of the study is the absent randomization of group 3 patients and the relatively small number of patients in each group. However, the patients were selected carefully according to predefined exclusion criteria and the groups did not differ significantly in donor or recipient characteristics or serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. Importantly, Celsior and University of Wisconsin preservation solutions are comparable concerning coronary vasomotor function early after transplantation (37). Thus the alterations in vasomotor function and the different expression of vasoactive factors are most likely attributable to the different immunosuppressive regimens. In addition, in the present investigation we have detected specific functional and molecular correlates of endothelial dysfunction early after transplantation. These possible markers of early functional coronary changes should be studied in future prospective randomized trials with respect to their impact on atherosclerotic coronary manifestations.

In summary, the immunosuppressive combinations of CyA + azathioprine and TKL + MMF appear to be superior to TKL + azathioprine regarding preservation of early coronary vasomotor function, eNOS expression, iNOS suppression, as well as cardiac IL-6 release. These functional and molecular graft alterations in the early period after transplantation may have an important impact on subsequent development of transplant coronary arteriosclerosis. In this regard, preliminary follow-up data from our patient population suggest that patient treated with TKL + azathioprine developed enhanced maximal epicardial intimal thickening compared with patients treated with CyA + azathioprine or TKL + MMF during the first year after transplantation (unpublished personal data). In line, in a recent prospective trial using volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis for the prevention of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, a trend toward a more pronounced progression of intimal thickening was noted in the TKL versus the CyA group (38).

Acknowledgment: This study was in part supported by the Friedrich-Baur Foundation, Munich Germany. We would like to thank Peter Fraunberger for collaborative work (cytokine analysis).

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Hosenpud JD, Shipley GD, Wagner CR. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current concepts, recent developments, and future directions. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992;11:9-18.

2. Weis M, von Scheidt W. Coronary artery disease in the transplanted heart. Ann Rev Med 2000;51:81-100.

3. Davis SF, Yeung AC, Meredith I, et al. Early endothelial dysfunction predicts the development of transplant coronary artery disease at 1 year posttransplant. Circulation 1996;93:457-62.

4. Mehra MR, Ventura HO, Chambers R, et al. Heterogeneity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: clinical insights from coronary angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1339-45.

5. Valantine HA, Hunt S, Gamberg P, et al. Impact of cyclosporine dose on long-term outcome after heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 1994;26:2710-2.

6. Pham SM, Kormos RL, Hattler BG, et al. A prospective trial of tacrolimus (FK 506) in clinical heart transplantation: intermediate-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;11:764-72.

7. Nair RV, Morris RE. Immunosuppression in cardiac transplantation: a new area in immunopharmacology. Curr Opin Cardiol 1995;10:207-17.

8. Koglin J, von Scheidt W. Isolated defect of adenosine-mediated coronary vasodilation: functional evidence for a new microangiopathic entity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:103-8.

9. St. Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Aldermann EL, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of "angiographically silent" intimal thickening. Circulation 1992;85:979-87.

10. Lagoo AS, George JF, Naftel DC, et al. Semiquantitative measurement of cytokine messenger RNA in endomyocardium and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from human heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996 Feb;15(2):206-17.

11. Arendt RM, Wilbert-Lampen U, Heucke L, et al. Increased endothelin plasma concentration in patients with coronary artery disease or hyperlipoproteinemia without coronary events. Res Exp Med 1993;193:225-8.

12. Granger DL, Taintor RR, Boockvar KS, et al. Measurement of nitrate and nitrite in biological samples using nitrate reductase and Griess reaction. Meth Enzymol 1996;268:142-7.

13. Zeiher AM. Endothelial vasodilator dysfunction: pathogenetic link to myocardial ischemia or epiphenomenon? Lancet 1996;348:S10-2.

14. Weis M, Hartmann A, Olbrich HG, et al. Prognostic significance of coronary flow reserve on left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation 1998;65:103-8.

15. Auch-Schwelk W, Bossaller C, Gotze S, et al. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle function after chronic treatment with cyclosporin A. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993;21:435-7.

16. O'Neil GS, Chester AH, Kushwahan S, et al. Cyclosporine treatment does not impair the release of nitric oxide in human coronary arteries. Br Heart J 1991;66:212-6.

17. Khalil A, Carrier M, Latour JG, et al. Cyclosporine A-induced coronary artery vasoconstriction through myogenic and endothelium dependent mechanisms. Circulation 1996;94:II-308-11.

18. Stroes ES, Lüscher TF, de Groot FG, et al. Cyclosporine A increases nitric oxide activity in vivo. Hypertension 1997;29:570-5.

19. Akita K, Dusting GJ, Hickey H. Suppression of nitric oxide by cyclosporin A and TKL in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1994;21:231-5.

20. Marumo T, Nakaki T, Hishikawa K, et al. Cyclosporine A inhibits NO-synthase induction in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension 1995;25:764-70.

21. Liew FY. Regulation of lymphocyte functions by nitric oxide. Curr Opin Immunol 1995;7:396-9.

22. MacLellan WR, Schneider MD. Death by design: programmed cell death in cardiovascular biology and disease. Circ Res 1997;81:137-47.

23. Harrison DG. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of endothelial cell dysfunction. J Clin Invest 1997;100:2153-6.

24. Weis M, Wildhirt SM, Schulze C, et al. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone by cytokines in cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation 1999;68:1263-7.

25. Mantovani A, Bussolino F, Dejana E. Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function. FASEB J 1992;6:2591-7.

26. Yoshimura N, Matsui S, Hamashima T, et al. Effect of a new immunosuppressive agent TKL, on human lymphocyte responses in vitro. II. Inhibition of IL-2 and μ-IFN, but not B cell stimulation factor 2. Transplantation 1989;47:356-9.

27. Gaweco AS, Otto G, Otto HF, et al. Common and sequential overexpression patterns of T-helper cytokines during acute (cellular) rejection, and correlation of proinflammatory cytokine expression with chronic rejection of human liver allografts: a study under cyclosporine, TKL, and quadruple BT563 immunosuppression. Transplant Proc 1995;27:1152-3.

28. Duchini A, Govindarajan S, Santucci M, et al. Effects of TNF-α and IL-6 on fluid phase permeability and ammonia diffusion in CNS-derived endothelial cells. J Invest Med 1996;44:474-7.

29. Watson C, Whittaker S, Smith N, et al. IL-6 acts on endothelial cells to preferentially increase their adherence for lymphocytes. Clin Exp Immunol 1996;105:112-5.

30. Nadeau KC, Azuma H, Tilney NL. Sequential cytokine expression in renal allografts in rats immunosuppressed with maintenance cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil. Transplantation 1996;62:1363-6.

31. Meiser BM, Billingham ME, Morris RE. Effects of cyclosporine, TKL, and rapamycin on graft-vessel disease. Lancet 1991;338:1297-8.

32. Arai S, Taramato S, Senoo Y. The impact of TKL on graft coronary disease of rat cardiac allograft: a comparison with cyclosporine. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992;11:757-62.

33. Ensley RD, Bristow MR, Olsen SL, et al. The use of mycophenolate mofetil (RS-61443) in human heart transplant recipients. Transplantation 1993;56:75-82.

34. Keogh A. Three-year results of the double-blind randomized multicenter trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant patients [abstract]. J Heart Lung Transplant 1999;18:53.

35. Platz KP, Sollinger HW, Hullett DA. RS61443: a new, potent immunosuppressive agent. Transplantation 1991;51:27-30.

36. Gregory CR, Huang X, Pratt RE, et al. Treatment with rapamycin and mycophenolate acid reduces arterial intimal thickening produced by mechanical injury and allows endothelial replacement. Transplantation 1995;59:655-61.

37. Wildhirt SM, Weis M, Schulze C, et al. Effects of Celsior and University of Wisconsin preservation solutions on hemodynamics and endothelial function after cardiac transplantation in humans. A single center, prospective, randomized trial. Transplant Int 2000;13:203-11.

38. Klauss V, König A, Spes C, et al. Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus (FK 506) for the prevention of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:266-9.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 26 time(s).

Transplantation Proceedings
Cyclosporine-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction: Is tetrahydrobiopterin the solution?
El-Hamamsy, I; Grant, M; Stevens, LM; Malo, O; Carrier, M; Perrault, LP
Transplantation Proceedings, 37(5): 2365-2370.
10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.021
CrossRef
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Simvastatin treatment is associated with improvement in coronary endothelial function and decreased cytokine activation in patients after heart transplantation
Weis, M; Pehlivanli, S; Meiser, BM; von Scheidt, W
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 38(3): 814-818.

Journal of Human Genetics
A model of prediction system for adverse cardiovascular reactions by calcineurin inhibitors among patients with renal transplants using gene-based single-nucleotide polymorphisms
Mushiroda, T; Saito, S; Tanaka, Y; Takasaki, J; Kamatani, N; Beck, Y; Tahara, H; Nakamura, Y; Ohnishi, Y
Journal of Human Genetics, 50(9): 442-447.
10.1007/s10038-005-0275-3
CrossRef
Circulation Research
Allograft vasculopathy versus atherosclerosis
Rahmani, M; Cruz, RP; Granville, DJ; McManus, BM
Circulation Research, 99(8): 801-815.
10.1161/01.RES.0000246086.93555.f3
CrossRef
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Peripheral expansion of circulating T-helper 1 cells predicts coronary endothelial dysfunction after cardiac transplantation
Methe, H; Wiegand, D; Welsch, U; Krombach, F; Meiser, B; Nabauer, M; Koglin, J
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 24(7): 833-840.
10.1016/j.healun.2004.05.014
CrossRef
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Cardiac allograft endothelial dysfunction
Kofler, S; Petrakopoulou, P; Nickel, T; Weis, M
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 62(): 79-82.
10.1007/s00228-005-0011-0
CrossRef
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Cardiac allograft endothelial dysfunction
Kofler, S; Petrakopoulou, P; Nickel, T; Weis, M
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 62(): 79-82.
10.1007/s00228-005-0011-0
CrossRef
Current Vascular Pharmacology
Endothelial Dysfunction in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Potential Pharmacological Interventions
Osto, E; Tona, F; De Bon, E; Iliceto, S; Cella, G
Current Vascular Pharmacology, 8(2): 169-188.

Journal of Rheumatology
Mycophenolate mofetil: A magic bullet for lupus?
McCune, WJ; Riskalla, MM
Journal of Rheumatology, 32(6): 967-970.

Transplantation Proceedings
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: Prevention and treatment options
Weis, M
Transplantation Proceedings, 34(5): 1847-1849.
PII S0041-1345(02)03101-9
CrossRef
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Three-year results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in cardiac transplant recipients
Eisen, HJ; Kobashigawa, J; Keogh, A; Bourge, R; Renlund, D; Mentzer, R; Alderman, E; Valantine, H; Dureau, G; Mancini, D; Mamelok, R; Gordon, R; Wang, WD; Mehra, M; Constanzo, MR; Hummel, M; Johnson, J
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 24(5): 517-525.
10.1016/j.healun.2005.02.002
CrossRef
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Coronary endothelial vasomotor function and vascular remodeling in heart transplant recipients randomized for tacrolimus or cyclosporine immunosuppression
Petrakopoulou, P; Anthopoulou, L; Muscholl, M; Klauss, V; von Scheidt, W; Uberfuhr, P; Meiser, BM; Reichart, B; Weis, M
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 47(8): 1622-1629.
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.073
CrossRef
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Long-term follow-up of brachytherapy for treatment of allograft in-stent restenosis
Zoghbi, GJ; Misra, VK; Chapman, GD; Hillegass, WB; Brott, BC; Aqel, RA; Bourge, RC
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 61(2): 217-221.
10.1002/ccd.10689
CrossRef
Transplantation
Review of major clinical trials with mycophenolate mofetil in cardiac transplantation
Kobashigawa, JA; Meiser, BM
Transplantation, 80(2): S235-S243.
10.1097/01.tp.0000186383.22264.b3
CrossRef
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Multicenter prospective investigation on cardiovascular adverse effects of tacrolimus in kidney transplantations
Seino, Y; Hori, M; Sonoda, T
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 17(2): 141-149.

Autoimmunity, Pt B: Novel Applications of Basic Research
Mycophenolate mofetil and atherosclerosis - Results of animal and human studies
Gibson, WT; Hayden, MR
Autoimmunity, Pt B: Novel Applications of Basic Research, 1110(): 209-221.
10.1196/annals.1423.023
CrossRef
Hypertension
Mycophenolate acid inhibits endothelial NAD(P)H oxidase activity and superoxide formation by a Rac1-dependent mechanism
Krotz, F; Keller, M; Derflinger, S; Schmid, H; Gloe, T; Bassermann, F; Duyster, J; Cohen, CD; Schuhmann, C; Klauss, V; Pohl, U; Stempfle, HU; Sohn, HY
Hypertension, 49(1): 201-208.
10.1161/01.HYP.0000251162.14782.d4
CrossRef
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and dysregulation of the NO synthase pathway
Weis, M; Cooke, JP
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 23(4): 567-575.
10.1161/01.ATV.0000067060.31369.F9
CrossRef
Journal of Vascular Research
mTOR inhibitors and calcineurin inhibitors do not affect adhesion molecule expression of human macro- and microvascular endothelial cells
Lehle, K; Schreml, S; Kunz-Schughart, LA; Rupprecht, L; Birnbaum, DE; Schmid, C; Preuner, JG
Journal of Vascular Research, 45(4): 333-342.
10.1159/000119199
CrossRef
European Heart Journal
Alloimmunity and nonimmunologic risk factors in cardiac allograft vasculopathy
Vassalli, G; Gallino, A; Weis, M; von Scheidt, W; Kappenberger, L; von Segesser, LK; Goy, JJ
European Heart Journal, 24(): 1180-1188.
10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00237-9
CrossRef
Clinical Transplantation
Mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine is associated with decreased acute rejection, late acute rejection, and risk for cardiovascular death in renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes
David, KM; Morris, JA; Steffen, BJ; Chi-Burris, KS; Gotz, VP; Gordon, RD
Clinical Transplantation, 19(2): 279-285.
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00338.x
CrossRef
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Status of the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor pathway in coronary arteries after heterotopic heart transplantation
Perrault, LP; Aubin, MC; Malo, O; Thollon, C; Villeneuve, N; Vilaine, JP; Vanhoutte, PM
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 26(1): 48-55.
10.1016/j.healun.2006.10.015
CrossRef
Transplantation
Evidence for a Role of Toll-Like Receptor 4 in Development of Chronic Allograft Rejection after Cardiac Transplantation
Methe, H; Zimmer, E; Grimm, C; Nabauer, M; Koglin, J
Transplantation, 78(9): 1324-1331.

PDF (649)
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Dendritic Cell Adhesion Is Enhanced on Endothelial Cells Preexposed to Calcineurin Inhibitors
Schlichting, CL; Schareck, WD; Weis, M
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 46(3): 250-254.

PDF (125)
Transplantation
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: central role of endothelial injury leading to transplant “atheroma”
Valantine, HA
Transplantation, 76(6): 891-899.

PDF (881)
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
The Impact of Immunosuppression on Endothelial Function
Trapp, A; Weis, M
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 45(1): 81-87.

PDF (403)
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

Transplantation; Endothelium; Coronary vasomotion; Immunosuppression

© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Follow Us!

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.