Skip Navigation LinksHome > 1998 - Volume 32 - Issue > Maximal and Submaximal Exercise Testing in Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology:
Treatment of Heart Failure: Current Insights and New Treatment Options

Maximal and Submaximal Exercise Testing in Heart Failure

Metra, Marco; Nodari, Savina; Raccagni, Domenica; Garbellini, Maria; Boldi, Emiliano; Bontempi, Luca; Gaiti, Monica; Cas, Livio Dei

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Cardiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Metra at Cattedra di Cardiologia, c/o Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.zza Spedali Civili, 25100 Brescia, Italia.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Although reduced exercise capacity is the main complaint of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), the best method to measure it remains controversial. Peak VO2, obtained using maximal exercise testing, is the most accurate measure of maximal functional capacity. It is related to peak exercise cardiac output and is one of the most important independent variables for the prognostic assessment of patients with CHF. It has, however, a low sensitivity for measurement of changes induced by therapy and is poorly related to everyday physical activity, patient symptoms, and quality of life. The anerobic threshold may also be regarded as a parameter of maximal functional capacity. Its value is mainly indirect, because it shows that the patient is performing a maximal effort limited by the cardiovascular system. The VO2 kinetics at the start and at the end of exercise are probably more related to patient symptoms, but it is unresolved which protocols and parameters might best be used to study this aspect of exercise performance. Duration of a submaximal exercise at a constant work rate and the distance walked during a 6-min walking test are gaining wide popularity as parameters of submaximal performance. However, when these exams are carried out up to exhaustion in patients with severe functional limitation, they may involve attainment of the anerobic threshold and therefore their clinical meaning may be similar to the one of a maximal exercise test. Moreover, tests based on the assessment of submaximal exercise capacity have been useful for assessment of therapy in single-center trials but have been often inadequate in multicenter trials.

Reduced exercise capacity is the main complaint of patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the best method to measure it is still controversial. In these past decades, the introduction of devices that can measure breath by breath respiratory gas analysis has radically improved our ability to gauge functional capacity. Peak VO2, obtained using maximal exercise testing, has become one of the most important parameters for assessment of both the prognosis and the effects of therapy in patients with CHF. However, the variables measured by maximal exercise testing are poorly related to everyday physical activity, which is characterized by the performance of a series of submaximal tasks. Therefore, these variables are relatively insensitive for evaluation of the effects of therapy. For this reason, different kinds of submaximal exercise testing are more and more frequently used. However, no standard method to assess submaximal functional capacity is now available and, moreover, many of the procedures proposed rely on performance of an exercise leading to exhaustion, which therefore has characteristics similar to the ones of a maximal exercise test.

Back to Top | Article Outline

WHY SHOULD WE USE EXERCISE TESTING IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE?

Functional capacity vs. left ventricular function and clinical assessment

The need to directly assess functional capacity derives both from its lack of relationship with resting left ventricular (LV) function and from the low accuracy of the classifications merely based on clinical evaluation.

Many studies have shown that functional capacity is poorly related to measures of resting LV function (1-11)(Fig. 1). Furthermore, the hemodynamic changes induced by therapy are not predictive of functional capacity, so that an agent may induce a significant acute and chronic hemodynamic improvement with no change in functional capacity (12-15).

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools

This lack of correlation may seem paradoxical at first, because it is unquestionable that myocardial damage is always the initial cause of the clinical picture of CHF. However, many factors link myocardial dysfunction to the patient symptoms (Table 1) so that, finally, resting LV dysfunction becomes poorly related to functional capacity. Accordingly, up to 25% of patients with CHF and significant functional limitation may exhibit normal skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise, with increased lactic acid production caused only by metabolic abnormalities of the skeletal muscle (31). Therefore, a simple assessment of resting LV function does not enable prediction of either the cardiac output response to exercise or the maximal functional capacity. This latter variable must be assessed directly in patients with CHF.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Functional capacity can be gauged either by a clinical evaluation of the patient symptoms or by specific procedures such as exercise testing. Classifications based on clinical evaluation, like that of the New York Heart Association, have an accuracy that is too low for assessment of functional capacity. They are, in fact, highly dependent on subjective issues related to how the patient perceives and describes the symptoms and to how they are interpreted by the physician. Therefore, although the clinical tools can easily identify extreme situations, e.g., patients who are symptomatic at rest or those who are completely asymptomatic, they fail to quantify the different degrees of functional limitation in patients who are symptomatic only during effort, who comprise the vast majority of ambulatory patients with CHF (32-34). Direct assessment of functional capacity through exercise testing is therefore mandatory in these patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MAXIMAL EXERCISE TESTING: NONRESPIRATORY PARAMETERS

A maximal exercise test is one that is performed with progressively increasing workloads up to limiting fatigue and/or dyspnea caused by exhaustion of the capacity for adaptation of the patient's cardiovascular system.

Traditional exercise testing, e.g., without respiratory gas monitoring, yields parameters that can be used as indices of functional capacity, such as peak exercise duration and peak exercise workload. These variables have been widely used in multicenter trials because they can be obtained rather easily and inexpensively.

Peak exercise duration and workload may be sensitive enough to detect the changes in functional capacity induced by therapy when relatively large study groups are evaluated. However, they are not suitable for assessment of single patients or small study groups because of their relative inaccuracy and low reproducibility.

Peak VO2 cannot be reliably predicted on the basis of the peak workload in patients with CHF (Fig. 2). In fact, the relation between the workload performed and the VO2 tends to decrease as patients with more severe functional limitation are considered (34,35). Moreover, many other factors, such as bicycle ergometer calibration, variations in the speed of pedaling, or variations in the strength with which the patient keeps himself tightened to the handrails, influence it. Therefore, direct assessment of VO2 during exercise allows a more accurate evaluation of the work performed by the patient. Second, respiratory gas monitoring with detection of the anaerobic threshold ensures that exercise is interrupted because of exhaustion of the capacity of the cardiovascular system with relative skeletal muscle hypoperfusion and lactic acidosis. In contrast, the interruption of exercise testing without respiratory gas monitoring may be influenced by subjective factors such as the patient's motivation, the physician's incitement to continue the exercise, and clinical evaluation of the patient's symptoms.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Maximal VO2 and peak VO2

Maximal VO2 is defined as the value of VO2 at which this variable remains stable, reaching a plateau, despite an increase in the workload, in incremental exercise testing (34,36-38). VO2 represents the maximal amount of oxygen a subject can utilize during physical activity and therefore measures both the maximal capacity of oxygen distribution by the cardiovascular system and that of oxygen uptake by the peripheral tissues.

When assessed in normal subjects, maximal VO2 is an objective and reproducible measure of maximal functional capacity. However, a clear-cut plateau of VO2 at peak exercise can be observed only rarely in patients with CHF because they are unable to sustain a maximal effort for more than a few seconds (10,34,36,39). In these patients we measure peak VO2, which is generally defined as the VO2 measured during the last 30 s of maximal exercise.

The lack of a VO2 plateau during exercise significantly reduces the reliability and objectivity of this variable because it may be influenced by the patient's motivation. However, when the anaerobic threshold is observed, this ensures that a maximal task has been performed and, accordingly, the reproducibility of peak VO2 was greater than the one of other variables in many studies (36,39,40). A derived parameter, the extrapolated maximal VO2, is less dependent on the patient's motivation(41).

In a normal subject, VO2 at peak exercise may reach values 10 to 20 times higher than those at rest. This is obtained through a four- to fivefold increase in the cardiac output, with a concomitant two- to threefold increase in the peripheral arteriovenous oxygen difference (37,38). Heart failure is characterized by impairment of the exercise-induced increase in cardiac output, and therefore peak VO2 and functional capacity are also reduced. Accordingly, peak VO2 is closely related to peak exercise cardiac output (Fig. 1), whereas its correlation with right and left ventricular filling pressures is much smaller (3-11). Quantification of the severity of CHF on the basis of peak VO2(3), in addition to the clinical classification of the New York Heart Association, has become very popular.

It is now common clinical practice to correct peak VO2 only for body weight (3). However, age, sex, and body composition, in addition to body weight, may also influence VO2 in patients with CHF (42,43). It may therefore be better to express peak VO2 as a percentage of the maximal predicted values rather than correcting only for body weight (34-36). This method has yielded a greater prognostic accuracy in some study groups (44,45).

Peak VO2 has been shown to be one of the main independent prognostic variables in patients with CHF (44-47). It is now regarded as the most important parameter for selection of patients for heart transplantation (48). However, the use of only a peak VO2 ≤14 ml/kg/min as a major criterion for heart transplantation may sometimes be misleading (49). In fact, as already stated, peak VO2 is influenced by many factors in addition to the cardiac response to exercise. These include the patient's age (Fig. 3) and sex, whose influence may be eliminated by expressing peak VO2 as a percentage of the maximal predicted values (44,45). In addition, a low peak VO2 may also be mainly caused by skeletal muscle deconditioning in up to about 25% of ambulatory patients with CHF (31). Such patients can be identified only through additional procedures, such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing with concomitant hemodynamic monitoring (50,51) and/or repetition of noninvasive exercise testing after 3-6 months (52). Patients whose main reason for a low exercise capacity is skeletal muscle deconditioning will have a normal cardiac output response to exercise (50,51) and an improvement of functional capacity during follow-up (52).

Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools

Peak VO2 is now the main variable used to assess the effects of therapy on functional capacity. In the VHe-FT trials peak VO2 has been serially assessed for more than 1 year in a large group of patients (53). These trials show how the clinical course of CHF is characterized by a progressive decline in both LV function and maximal functional capacity, in agreement with the poor prognosis for these patients (53). However, a dissociation between the effects of therapy on mortality and functional capacity may be observed, because enalapril was more effective on prognosis, whereas only the hydralazine isosorbide dinitrate combination was able to significantly improve peak VO2 in the VHeFT-II trial (53). These data show the utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for assessment of the clinical course of CHF.

Peak VO2 has some important limitations in the evaluation of the effects of therapy. First, it is a measure of maximal functional capacity. However, even if it may have an important prognostic value it bears only a slight relationship to everyday physical activity when the patient performs a series of submaximal, brief physical tasks. Accordingly, it is often poorly related to measurements regarding daily physical activity and quality of life (54,55). Despite its high reproducibility, peak VO2 has low sensitivity for detection of the effects of therapy, and the clinical significance of the changes observed may be slight. In the majority of studies, changes in peak VO2 approximate 1-2 ml/kg/min. It is difficult to believe that such changes have any clinical relevance in patients with CHF. The relatively low sensitivity of peak VO2 to drug-induced changes may be explained by the many factors that may influence it (Table 1). For example, drugs that can improve LV function and hemodynamics are unable to alter functional capacity in patients with CHF in whom skeletal muscle deconditioning is the main cause of reduced functional capacity (31). These patients have been shown to be especially sensitive to the effects of physical training (56).

Back to Top | Article Outline
The anaerobic threshold

Many of the shortcomings of peak VO2 can also pertain to the anaerobic threshold. The anaerobic threshold corresponds to the work rate at which oxygen delivery to the tissues becomes inadequate and anaerobic glycolysis becomes the main source of energy production (38,57). It can be measured during incremental exercise testing both invasively, as the point at which arterial or mixed venous lactate levels start to increase more steeply, or noninvasively, through respiratory gas monitoring, as the point at which carbon dioxide production (VCO2) and minute ventilation (VE) start to increase more than VO2(3,10,38,39,40,57-59). These respiratory changes occur because the increase in lactic acid production by the skeletal muscle is buffered by the bicarbonate/carbonic acid system, with a secondary increase of CO2 that stimulates ventilation. The use of the V-slope method, based on the detection of the change of the slope of the relation between VO2 and VCO2, allows detection of the anaerobic threshold in a larger number of patients with greater reproducibility (59). The anaerobic threshold has shown relatively low interobserver variability and relatively good reproducibility, when measured after either days (10,40) or months (60) in patients with CHF.

The anaerobic threshold corresponds to the work rate that the patient can maintain for a prolonged period of time without lactic acidosis and sensations of fatigue (57). Patients with CHF exhibit a reduction in the anaerobic threshold which, similar to peak VO2, can be used as an index of disease severity (3,10,34,57). The anaerobic threshold and peak VO2 are closely linked to each other, with the former occurring at about 60-70% of peak exercise (10,34). The same hemodynamic variables that determine peak VO2 are also related to the anaerobic threshold (10).

Compared with peak VO2, the anaerobic threshold has the potential advantage of not requiring performance of a maximal test, and is therefore less dependent on patient motivation. It has been often used as a measure of the changes in functional capacity induced by therapy(12,13,53,61-63) or physical training(64). In some studies it has been more sensitive than peak VO2(62) although, as already stated, it has a similar clinical significance.

The physiopathologic significance of the anerobic threshold has been widely discussed. It has been pointed out that lactic acid production by fast-twitch skeletal muscle fibers may be present even at rest or at low workloads, and that the increase in lactic acid at peak exercise may be caused by a decline in hepatic blood flow and lactic acid metabolism rather than by its increased production (65,66). However, nuclear magnetic spectroscopy studies have demonstrated a progressive skeletal muscle acidosis induced by exercise with an earlier occurrence in patients with CHF compared to normal subjects (67,68). These changes represent the physiopathologic basis of the anaerobic threshold. Interestingly, they may also occur in the presence of a normal peripheral blood flow (67,68).

The main shortcomings of the anaerobic threshold are probably related to its clinical application rather to its physiopathologic significance. First, despite the improvements obtained with the V-slope method (59), the anerobic threshold cannot be detected in up to about 25% of ambulatory patients with CHF (10,39,58,61). This percentage may even increase when patients with a more severe limitation of functional capacity are considered (69). These difficulties of determination may be caused by oscillations of the respiratory variables during exercise and/or by the occurrence of lactic acid production even at low levels of exercise in patients with more severe peripheral hypoperfusion. Because of these difficulties of detection, the anaerobic threshold may have a relatively low sensitivity in the assessment of changes induced by therapy. For example, it has been calculated that, to be significant on an individual basis, the change in the VO2 at the anaerobic threshold must be ≥3.3 ml/kg/min (i.e., twice the standard error of its spontaneous variations)(58). Such changes occur very rarely in CHF trials.

Because of these shortcomings, the anerobic threshold is less useful than peak exercise duration and, above all, peak VO2 in the assessment of the effects of therapy on maximal functional capacity (53,61). Changes in peak VO2 therefore cannot be used as a primary end point of therapy. Rather, the usefulness of peak VO2 appears to be mainly indirect. Detection of the anerobic threshold is an index that exercise testing has been maximal and has been interrupted because of exhaustion of the cardiovascular reserve with skeletal muscle hypoperfusion and metabolic acidosis. Detection of the anerobic threshold allows exclusion of the possibility that exercise has been terminated because of poor patient motivation, peripheral artery disease with leg pain, or pulmonary disease.

Back to Top | Article Outline
The ventilatory response to exercise

Compared to normal subjects, patients with CHF exhibit an increase of minute ventilation at matched workloads (3,25,29,30,70,71). The ventilatory response to exercise should be measured relatively to some of its main determinants, e.g., VCO2, rather than as an absolute value (29,30,71). The slope of the VE vs. VCO2 relation is significantly increased in patients with CHF compared to normal subjects (29,30,71). It is inversely related to exercise duration, peak VO2, and the anaerobic threshold (70). Because it requires performance of an effort carried out up to above the anerobic threshold, it must be considered as a parameter of maximal effort.

Exercise hyperpnea may be a factor contributing to the reduction of functional capacity of patients with CHF. In fact, it increases the work of the respiratory muscles, a mechanism which, with the concomitant reduction of the cardiac output, may cause respiratory muscle deoxygenation and the sensation of dyspnea (72). Many interventions, including administration of ACE inhibitors, physical training, and heart transplantation, have been shown to reduce the ventilatory response to exercise(71). It has also been shown that measurement of the ventilatory response to exercise may further improve the prognostic assessment of patients with CHF compared to peak VO2 (73).

The mechanisms of the increased ventilatory response to exercise are multiple. Below the anerobic threshold, an important factor is represented by the increase in the ratio of pulmonary dead space to tidal volume consequent to the reduction in pulmonary perfusion and the increased ventilation-perfusion mismatch. The increased ventilatory response to exercise can therefore be considered a compensatory mechanism, controlled by arterial chemoreceptors and aimed to maintain constancy of the arterial blood gases despite the increase in the functional dead space (30). However, compared to those with a normal ventilatory response, patients with more severe exercise hyperpnea exhibit no major changes in arterial PaO2 and pH, with a greater decline in PaCO2 and a lower reduction in arterial bicarbonate at the end of exercise(30). This shows that additional mechanisms stimulate the ventilatory response to exercise and tend to mask the metabolic acidosis that occurs at the end of exercise. These mechanisms include an increased sensitivity of the arterial chemoreceptors(74) and reflexes driven by metaboreceptors and mechanoreceptors of the abnormal skeletal muscles (25).

Back to Top | Article Outline

PARAMETERS AT THE START AND END OF EXERCISE: RELATED TO EVERYDAY LIFE?

Patients do not perform maximal tasks during everyday life. Their activity is instead characterized by many submaximal efforts of short duration, and the main source of their symptoms may be represented by the oxygen debt they gain at the start of each exercise when the cardiorespiratory system must adapt itself to the increased workload. Therefore, assessment of the cardiorespiratory response at the start and at the end of exercise might furnish significant information related to patient symptoms and quality of life.

In normal subjects, the VO2 increment at the start of exercise has two phases: a first phase characterized by a rapid increase, lasting about 15 s, during which VO2 can double its resting values, followed by a second phase lasting less than 2-3 min, during which VO2 increases exponentially up to a steady state when the VO2 required by the workload is reached (38). When the work rate used is above the anaerobic threshold, VO2 does not reach a steady state but continues to increase slowly beyond the first 3 min (75,76). The oxygen deficit gained at the start of exercise is then paid back at its end by an increase in VO2 above the resting values (oxygen debt)(38).

The kinetics of VO2 both at the start (77,78) and at the end of exercise (79-81) are delayed in patients with CHF compared to normal subjects. Indices of VO2 recovery appear to be independent of the workload used (80) and to be applicable with protocols based either on constant workloads or on incremental maximal exercises (80,81). The half-time and the time constant of VO2 recovery (80,81) and the ratio between total VO2 during exercise and during recovery (81) have been found to be related to peak VO2 (80,81) and may have an independent prognostic value in patients with a moderate degree of functional limitation (maximal predicted VO2 >40%) (81). These parameters present many potential advantages in comparison to peak VO2 and the anerobic threshold. They can also be obtained using submaximal protocols, e.g., with exercises interrupted before the anaerobic threshold is reached. They are therefore independent of the patient's motivation, and are objective and reproducible(80). They also appear to be more closely related to the symptoms of the patients, because they are mainly involved in many brief, submaximal exercises and most of their symptoms may be caused by the delayed adaptation of the cardiorespiratory system to the workload performed. However, no index of VO2 kinetics has been widely used and validated up until now, and no data are available regarding their relation to patients' symptoms and quality of life and their sensitivity to the effects of therapy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SUBMAXIMAL EXERCISE DURATION, 6-MIN WALK TEST, AND 9-MIN TREADMILL TEST: PARAMETERS OF SUBMAXIMAL OR MAXIMAL EXERCISE?

After having been used by physiologists for a long time, protocols based on constant workloads have also been proposed for evaluation of patients with CHF. In these protocols the duration of an exercise performed at a constant work rate is measured. Because these protocols utilize a submaximal workload, they appear to more accurately reproduce everyday activity when the patient walks or rides a bicycle.

Protocols based on the measurement of submaximal exercise duration are critically dependent on the workload used. When it is below the anerobic threshold, exercise may be pursued for a very long time, beyond 20-30 min. Therefore, if these examinations are used to quantify changes in functional capacity, the workload of the baseline test should probably be just above the anaerobic threshold, i.e., at about 80% of the maximal workload; so that the exercise will be maintained only for a few minutes. If the patient then improves in functional capacity during follow-up, the work rate used in the first examination will now be below the anaerobic threshold and so the exercise duration will be longer. This kind of protocol is therefore able to magnify changes related to variables in maximal functional capacity, e.g., the anaerobic threshold, but, at the same time, is less dependent on parameters, such as maximal heart rate, that influence peak VO2.

These characteristics explain why this protocol has been able to demonstrate the improvement in functional capacity induced by chronic administration of carvedilol, a nonselective β-blocker with associated α-antagonist, antiproliferative and antioxidant activities. In a placebo-controlled trial in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, this agent did not change peak VO2 and VO2 at the anerobic threshold despite a highly significant improvement in LV function and stroke volume both at rest and during exercise (82). In fact, the marked reduction in peak exercise heart rate caused by β-blockade hindered the improvement in peak exercise cardiac output that would have been necessary to also change the peak VO2. In contrast, submaximal exercise duration, which is less dependent on peak exercise heart rate, exhibited a significant increase that was related to the improvement in the New York Heart Association functional class and quality of life, as assessed through the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (82,83). Protocols based on an exercise at a constant work rate have also been able to show a significant improvement after physical training (84).

Assessment of submaximal exercise duration has not been sensitive enough to detect the changes induced by therapy in multicenter studies (53). It is probable that these unsatisfactory results are at least partially caused by the baseline workload used which, in some cases, may have been too low. Accordingly, 185/370 studies (50%) were excluded from data analysis because of a baseline exercise duration >18 min in the V-HeFT I trial (53). Therefore, protocols based on the assessment of submaximal exercise duration may not be ideal for multicenter trials because of difficulties in the choice of the baseline work rate. These protocols may actually require a repetition of the baseline test, up to when a workload just above the anaerobic threshold is found. Only in this way will the duration of the exercise at baseline be sufficiently short to allow detection of a change during follow-up. Submaximal exercise duration is also probably less reproducible and more sensitive to the effects of placebo, particularly when used in multicenter trials (53).

The 9-min treadmill test and the 6-min walk test are based on the measurement of the distance walked by the patient during a fixed period of time. They are well accepted by the patient and are easier to perform because they do not require specific equipment. Therefore, they will be increasingly used as submaximal protocols in studies of drug efficacy. However, as will be shown, they actually appear to measure maximal rather than submaximal functional capacity.

The 9-min treadmill test measures the distance walked during 9 min on a treadmill with a fixed 7° inclination. To better reproduce daily activity, the patient can stop to take a temporary rest during the examination (85). This exam has high reproducibility and allows easy differentiation among patients with different degrees of functional limitation(85,86). However, its clinical significance is very similar to that of the peak VO2 because the VO2 reached with this test averages 95 ± 5% of peak VO2 (86), with a high correlation between these two measurements (86). Therefore, the 9-min treadmill test must be considered a test of maximal functional capacity.

The 6-min walk test measures the distance walked by the patient in a corridor during 6 min. The patient is encouraged to walk and, similarly to the previous examination, may stop to take a rest. The operator must periodically inform the patient about the time remaining to the end of the examination (87,88). This examination has shown a high degree of reproducibility, even if a first, preliminary exam should always be performed and excluded and a spontaneous improvement is always observed between the first and second of two consecutive examinations performed within a short period of time, e.g., 24 h (89). In drug efficacy studies, reproducibility may be increased by using the mean value of two consecutive tests performed within 1 day, both before and after therapy (89,90).

The 6-min walk distance has been shown to be related to prognosis in a substudy of the SOLVD trial (91). However, no study has yet assessed its independent prognostic value compared with peak VO2. This examination has also been used for assessment of the effects of therapy, i.e., β-blockade, in overcoming the limits of maximal exercise testing. Like the submaximal exercise duration, the 6-min walk test has also yielded significant results in a single-center study (92) but not in multicenter trials (93,94). It is interesting to note that, despite the lack of change in variables related to both maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, direct symptom assessment revealed a significant improvement with carvedilol compared to placebo (93,95). These data underscore both the difficulties in assessment of functional capacity with β-blocker therapy, because it blunts the cardiovascular response to exercise, and the limits of our available exercise protocols, which are less sensitive than simple direct symptom assessment in multicenter, placebo-controlled trials.

On the other hand, the 6-min walk test may have the significance of a maximal test when patients with moderate to severe CHF are studied. Measurements of VO2 during the 6-min walk test have shown that its clinical significance is different in normal subjects and in patients with CHF. The VO2 reached during the 6-min walk test averages 65 ± 16% of maximal VO2 in normal subjects, whereas it reaches 79 ± 24% in patients with CHF (96,97), with the majority reaching the anaerobic threshold and a significant percentage with VO2 values even higher than during the maximal test (97). Therefore, the 6-min walk test measures submaximal exercise performance in normal subjects and patients with only a mild limitation of functional capacity (98) but becomes an examination of maximal functional capacity in patients with severe CHF(96,97). Accordingly, the distance walked in the 6-min walk test has a high degree of correlation with peak VO2 (99)(Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools

Physical activity can also be measured directly by the use of specific sensors of limb movements (54,100). These measurements are poorly related to quality of life scores and peak VO2(100). Day-to-day variability of the results is also high because of spontaneous fluctuations. It has been observed that measurements should be continued for at least 5-6 consecutive days to obtain reproducible results that can be used in drug efficacy studies (100). These measurements, even if certainly submaximal and related to everyday life, are therefore not practical and not reproducible enough to be applied in serial evaluations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

We have tried to examine some of the most widespread parameters used to measure functional capacity in patients with CHF. Unfortunately, functional capacity itself is not a homogeneous entity but has different features, with only a weak relation between them. The greatest difference is between maximal and submaximal functional capacity. The first expresses the maximal capacity of the cardiorespiratory system. It is therefore a measure of CHF severity with high prognostic value. However, it is poorly related to everyday physical activity when the patient performs mainly submaximal tasks. A change in maximal functional capacity may therefore imply an improvement in prognosis, whereas an improvement in submaximal indices may be more related to a change in symptoms. Unfortunately, no standard protocol to assess submaximal functional capacity is yet available.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Franciosa JA, Ziesche S, Wilen M. Functional capacity of patients with chronic left ventricular failure: relationship of bicycle exercise performance to clinical and hemodynamic characterization. Am J Med 1979;67:460-6.

2. Franciosa JA, Park M, Levine B. Lack of relation between exercise capacity and indices of resting left ventricular performance in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1981;47:33-9.

3. Weber KT, Kinasewitz GT, Janicki JS, Fishman AP. Oxygen utilization and ventilation during exercise in patients with chronic cardiac failure. Circulation 1982;65:1213-23.

4. Higginbotham MB, Morris KG, Conn EH, Colemane R, Cobb FR. Determinants of variable exercise performance among patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:52-60.

5. Baker BJ, Wilen MM, Boyd CM, Dinh H, Franciosa JA. Relation of right ventricular ejection fraction to exercise capacity in chronic left ventricular failure. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:596-9.

6. Franciosa JA; Baker BJ, Seth L. Pulmonary versus systemic hemodynamics in determining exercise capacity of patients with chronic left ventricular failure. Am Heart J 1985;110:807-13.

7. Szlachcic J, Massie BM, Kramer BL, Topic N, Tubau J. Correlates and prognostic implication of exercise capacity in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1985;55:1037-42.

8. Lipkin DA, Canepa-Anson R, Stephens MR, Poole-Wilson PA. Factors determining symptoms in heart failure: comparison of fast and slow exercise tests.Br Heart J 1986;55:439-45.

9. Meiler SEL, Ashton JJ, Moeshberger ML, Unverferth DV, Leier CV. An analysis of the determinants of exercise performance in congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1987;113:1207-17.

10. Metra M, Raddino R, Dei Cas L, Visioli O. Assessment of peak oxygen consumption, lactate and ventilatory threshold and correlation with the resting and exercise hemodynamic data in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:1127-33.

11. Mabee SW, Metra M, Reed DE, Dei Cas L, Cody RJ. Pulmonary hypertension and systemic hypotension as limitations to exercise in chronic heart failure. J Cardiac Fail 1994;1:27-33.

12. Dei Cas L, Metra M, Ferrari R, Visioli O. Acute and chronic effects of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nisoldipine on the resting and exercise hemodynamics, neurohumoral parameters, and functional capacity of patients with chronic heart failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1993;7:103-10.

13.Dei Cas L, Metra M, Visioli O. Effects of acute and chronic ibopamine administration on resting and exercise hemodynamics, plasma catecholamines and functional capacity of patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:629-34.

14. Drexler H, Banhardt U, Meinertz T, Wollschlager H, Lehmann M, Just H. Contrasting peripheral short-term and long-term effects of converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 1989;79:491-502.

15. Massie BM, Kramer BL, Topic N. Lack of relationship between the short-term hemodynamic effects of captopril and subsequent clinical responses. Circulation 1984;69:1135-41.

16. Francis GS, Goldsmith SR, Ziesche S, Nakajima H, Cohn JN. Relative attenuation of sympathetic drive during exercise in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:832-9.

17.Colucci WS, Ribeiro JP, Rocco MB, et al. Impaired chronotropic response to exercise in patients with congestive heart failure: role of post-synaptic beta-adrenergic desensitization. Circulation 1989;80:314-23.

18.White M, Yanowitz F, Gilbert EM, et al. Role of beta-adrenergic downregulation in the peak exercise response of subjects with heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:1271-6.

19.Stone GW, Kubo SH, Cody RJ. Adverse influence of baroreceptor dysfunction on upright exercise in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1986;80:799-802.

20. Mancini DM, Walter G, Reichnek N, et al. Contribution of skeletal muscle atrophy to exercise intolerance and altered muscle metabolism in heart failure.Circulation 1992;85:1364-73.

21. Sullivan MJ, Knight D, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Relation between central and peripheral hemodynamics during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Muscle blood flow is reduced with maintenance of arterial perfusion pressure. Circulation 1989;80:769-81.

22. Sullivan MJ, Green HJ, Cobb FR. Skeletal muscle biochemistry and histology in ambulatory patients with long term heart failure. Circulation 1990;81:518-27.

23. Drexler H, Riede U, Munzel T, Konig H, Funke E, Just H. Alterations of skeletal muscle in chronic heart failure. Circulation 1992;85:1751-9.

24. Schaufelberger M, Eriksson BO, Grimby G, Held P, Swedberg K. Skeletal muscle alterations in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 1997;18:971-80.

25. Piepoli M, Clark AL, Volterrani M, Adamopoulos S, Sleight P, Coats AJS. Contribution of muscle afferents to the hemodynamic, autonomic, and ventilatory responses to exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Effects of physical training. Circulation 1996;93:940-52.

26. Agostoni PG, Marenzi GC, Sganzerla P, et al. Lung-heart interaction as a substrate for the improvement in exercise capacity after body fluid depletion in moderate congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:793-8.

27. Cabanes LR, Weber SN, Matran R, et al. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacoline in patients with impaired left ventricular function. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1317-22.

28.Kraemer MD, Kubo SH, Rector TS, Brunsvold N, Bank AJ. Pulmonary and peripheral vascular factors are important determinants of peak exercise oxygen uptake in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:641-8.

29.Sullivan MJ, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Increased exercise ventilation in patients with chronic heart failure: intact ventilatory control despite hemodynamic and pulmonary abnormalities. Circulation 1988;77:552-9.

30.Metra M, Raccagni D, Carini G, et al. Ventilatory and arterial blood gas changes during exercise in heart failure. In: Wasserman K, ed. Exercise gas exchange in heart disease. New York: Futura Publishing, 1996;125-43.

31.Wilson JR, Mancini DM, Dunkman B. Exertional fatigue due to skeletal muscle dysfunction in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1993;87:470-5.

32. Franciosa JA. Exercise testing in chronic congestive heart failure.Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1447-50.

33. Lipkin DP, Perkins J, Poole-Wilson PA. Respiratory gas exchange in the assessment of patients with impaired ventricular function. Br Heart J 1985;54:321-8.

34. Metra M, Rajfer SI. Ruolo della prova da sforzo nella valutazione funzionale del paziente con insufficienza cardiaca. Cardiologia 1986;31:653-6.

35. Itoh H, Taniguchi K, Koike A, Doi M. Evaluation of the severity of heart failure using ventilatory gas analysis. Circulation 1990;81(suppl II):II-31-7.

36. Cohen-Solal A, Gourgon R. Assessment of exercise tolerance in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:36C-40C.

37. Mitchell YM, Blomqvist G. Maximal oxygen uptake. N Engl J Med 1971;284:1018-22.

38.Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Whipp BJ, Casaburi R. Measurements during integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. In: Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Whipp BJ, Casaburi R, eds. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1994:52-79.

39. Wilson JR, Fink LI, Ferraro N, Dunkam WB, Jones RA. Use of maximal bicycle exercise testing with respiratory gas analysis to assess exercise performance in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to coronary heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:601-6.

40. Cohen-Solal A, Zannad F, Kayanakis JG, et al., for the VO2 French Study Group. Multicentre study of the determination of peak oxygen uptake and ventilatory threshold during bicycle exercise in chronic heart failure. Comparison of graphical methods, interobserver variability and influence of the exercise protocol. Eur Heart J 1991;12:1055-63.

41. Clark AL, Poole-Wilson PA, Coats AJS. Effects of motivation of the patient on indices of exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. Br Heart J 1994;71:162-5.

42. Metra M, Raddino R, Nodari S, et al. Influence of age on the parameters used to quantitate functional capacity in the patients with heart failure [Abstract]. Eur Heart J 1990;11(suppl):213.

43. Mabee SW, Metra M, Reed DE, Dei Cas L, Cody RJ. Age related changes in hemodynamic response to exercise in patients with chronic congestive heart failure [Abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23(suppl):122A.

44. Stelken AM, Younis LT, Jennison SH, et al. Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing using percent achieved of predicted peak oxygen uptake for patients with ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy.J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:345-52.

45. Metra M, Papa A, Nodari S, et al. Prognostic value of peak VO2, measured as percentage of age, sex and body surface area adjusted peak predicted value, in chronic heart failure patients [Abstract]. Eur Heart J 1996;17(suppl):8.

46. Mancini DM, Eisen H, Kussmaul W, Mull R, Edmunds LH, Jr., Wilson JR. Value of peak exercise consumption for optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with heart failure. Circulation 1991;83:778-86.

47. Cohn JN, Johnson GR, Shabetai R, et al. Ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption, cardiothoracic ratio, ventricular arrhythmias, and plasma norepinephrine as determinants of prognosis in heart failure. Circulation 1993;87(suppl VI):VI-5-16.

48. Mudge GH, Goldstein S, Addonizio LJ, et al. Task force 3. Recipient guidelines/priorization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:21-31.

49. Pina IL. Optimal candidates for heart transplantation: is 14 the magic number? J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:436-7.

50. Chomsky DB, Lang CC, Rayos GH, et al. Hemodynamic exercise testing. A valuable tool in the selection of cardiac transplantation candidates. Circulation 1996;94:3176-83.

51. Metra M, Faggiano P, D'Aloia A, et al. Mild hemodynamic impairment in patients with heart failure and reduced functional capacity [Abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:423A.

52. Stevenson LW, Steimle AE, Fonarow G, et al. Improvement in exercise capacity of candidates awaiting heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:163-70.

53. Ziesche S, Cobb FR, Cohn JN, et al., for the V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate combination improves exercise tolerance in heart failure. Results from V-HeFT I and V-HeFT II. Circulation 1993;87(suppl VI):VI-56-64.

54.Oka RK, Stotts NA, Dae MW, Haskell WL, Gortner SR. Daily physical activity levels in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:921-5.

55. Francis GS, Rector TS. Maximal exercise tolerance as a therapeutic end point in heart failure-are we relying on the right measure? Am J Cardiol 1994;73:304-6.

56. Wilson JR, Groves J, Rayos G. Circulatory status and response to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1996;94:1567-72.

57. Wasserman K, Beaver WL, Whipp BJ. Gas exchange theory and the lactic acidosis (anaerobic) threshold.Circulation 1990;81(suppl II):II-14-30.

58. Simonton CA, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. The ventilatory threshold: quantitative analysis of reproducibility and relation to arterial lactate concentration in normal subjects and in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:100-7.

59. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1986;60:2020-7.

60. Janicki JS, Gupta S, Ferris ST, McElroy PA. Long-term reproducibility of respiratory gas exchange measurements during exercise in patients with stable cardiac failure. Chest 1990;97:12-7.

61. Cohn JN, Ziesche S, Johnson G, Cobb F. Use of exercise gas measurements in multicenter drug studies. In: Wasserman K, ed. Exercise gas exchange in heart disease. New York: Futura Publishing, 1996:245-56.

62. Uretsky BF, Jessup M, Konstam MA, for the Enoximone Multicenter Trial Group. Multicenter trial of oral enoximone in patients with moderate to moderately severe congestive heart failure: lack of benefit compared with placebo. Circulation 1990;82:774-80.

63. Metra M, Cannella G, La Canna G, et al. Improvement in exercise capacity after correction of anemia in patients with end-stage renal failure. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:1060-6.

64. Sullivan MJ, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure delays ventilatory anaerobic threshold and improves submaximal exercise performance.Circulation 1989;79:324-9.

65. Brooks GA. Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985;1:6-18.

66. Tavazzi L. La soglia anaerobica: interpretazione e utilita' clinica. G Ital Cardiol 1989;19:281-6.

67. Wiener DH, Fink L, Maris J, Jones RA, Chance B, Wilson JR. Abnormal skeletal muscle bioenergetics during exercise in patients with heart failure: role of reduced muscle blood flow. Circulation 1986;73:1127-36.

68. Massie B, Conway M, Yonge R, et al. Skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with congestive heart failure: relation to clinical severity and blood flow. Circulation 1987;76:1009-19.

69. Katz SD, Berkowitz R, LeJemtel TH. Anaerobic threshold detection in patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:1565-9.

70. Metra M, Dei Cas L, Panina G, Visioli O. Exercise hyperventilation in chronic congestive heart failure, and its relation to functional capacity and hemodynamics. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:622-8.

71.Metra M, Dei Cas L. Role of exercise ventilation in the limitation of functional capacity in patients with congestive heart failure. Basic Res Cardiol 1996;91(suppl 1):31-6.

72. Mancini DM, Henson D, LaManca J, Levine S. Respiratory muscle function and dyspnea in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Circulation 1992;86:909-18.

73.MacGowan GA, Janosko K, Cecchetti A, Murali S. Exercise-related ventilatory abnormalities and survival in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1264-6.

74. Chua TP, Harrington D, Ponikowski P, Webb-Peploe K, Poole Wilson PA, Coats AJS. Effects of dihydrocodeine on chemosensitivity and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:147-52.

75. Whipp BJ, Wasserman K. Oxygen uptake kinetics for various intensities of constant-load work. J Appl Physiol 1972;33:351-6.

76. Casaburi R, Barstow TJ, Robinson T, Wasserman K. Influence of work rate on ventilatory and gas exchange kinetics. J Appl Physiol 1989;67:547-55.

77.Zhang YY, Wasserman K, Sietsema KE, et al. O2 uptake kinetics in response to exercise. A measure of tissue anaerobiosis in heart failure. Chest 1993;103:735-41.

78. Riley M, Porszasz J, Stanford CF, Nicholls DP. Gas exchange responses to constant work rate exercise in chronic cardiac failure. Br Heart J 1994;72:150-5.

79. Chelimsky-Fallick C, Stevenson LW, Lem V, Whipp BJ. Excessive oxygen deficit during low-level exercise in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:799-802.

80.Cohen-Solal A, Laperche T, Morvan D, Geneves M, Caviezel B, Gourgon R. Prolonged kinetics of recovery of oxygen consumption after maximal graded exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Analysis with gas exchange measurements and NMR spectroscopy.Circulation 1995;91:2924-32.

81. de Groote P, Millaire A, Decoulx E, Nugue O, Guimier P, Ducloux G. Kinetics of oxygen consumption during and after exercise in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. New markers of exercise intolerance with clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:168-75.

82. Metra M, Nardi M, Giubbini R, Dei Cas L. Effects of acute and chronic carvedilol administration on the resting and exercise hemodynamics, clinical conditions and exercise capacity of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1678-87.

83. Metra M, Nodari S, Raccagni D, Garbellini M, Milan E, Dei Cas L. Relation between hemodynamic and functional capacity changes after chronic carvedilol therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [Abstract]. Circulation 1995;92:I-393.

84. Sullivan MJ, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Exercise training in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: central and peripheral hemodynamic effects. Circulation 1988;78:506-15.

85. Sparrow J, Parameshwar J, Poole-Wilson PA. Assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure: time-limited exercise on a self-powered treadmill. Br Heart J 1994;71:391-4.

86. Yamani MH, Wells L, Massie BM, Ammon S, Der E, Prouty K. Relation of the nine-minute self-powered treadmill test to maximal exercise capacity and skeletal muscle function in patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:788-92.

87. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PI, et al. The six minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132:919-23.

88. Lipkin DP, Scriven AJ, Crake T, Poole-Wilson PA. Six minute walking test for assessing exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. BMJ 1986;292:653-5.

89. Boldi E, Metra M, Rosselli F, et al. Reproducibility of the 6 minutes walk test in the patients with heart failure [Abstract]. Heart Fail 1997:95.

90. Yusuf S, Tsuyuki R. Using exercise endpoints in heart failure trials: design considerations. Eur Heart J 1996;17:4.

91. Bittner V, Weiner DH, Yusuf S, et al., for the SOLVD Investigators. Prediction of mortality and morbidity with a 6-minute walk test in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. JAMA 1993;270:1702-7.

92. Krum H, Sackner-Bernstein JD, Goldsmith RL, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the long-term efficacy of carvedilol in patients with severe chronic heart failure. Circulation 1995;92:1499-506.

93. Packer M, Colucci WS, Sackner-Bernstein J, et al., for the PRECISE Study Group. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure: the PRECISE trial. Circulation 1996;94:2793-9.

94. Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, et al., for the MOCHA Investigators. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure.Circulation 1996;94:2807-16.

95. Colucci WS, Packer M, Bristow MR, et al., for the Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. Carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with mild symptoms of heart failure. Circulation 1996;94:2800-6.

96. Foray A, Williams D, Reemtsma K, Oz M, Mancini D. Assessment of submaximal exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 1996;94(suppl II):222-6.

97. Faggiano P, D'Aloia A, Gualeni A, Lavatelli A, Giordano A. Oxygen uptake during the 6 minutes walking test. Preliminary experience using a portable device. Am Heart J [in press].

98.Riley M, McParland J, Stanford CF, Nicholls DP. Oxygen consumption during corridor walk testing in chronic cardiac failure. Eur Heart J 1992;13:789-93.

99. Boldi E, Metra M, Rosselli F, et al. The 6 minutes walk test in the assessment of patients with heart failure: correlation with other parameters of functional capacity [Abstract]. Heart Fail 1997:95.

100.Davies SW, Jordan SL, Lipkin DP. Use of limb movement sensors as indicators of the level of everyday physical activity in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:1581-6.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Section Description

Proceedings of a symposium held in Apeldoorn, The Netherlands May 31, 1997

Keywords:

Congestive heart failure; Exercise testing; Kinetic parameters; VO2

© Lippincott-Raven Publishers.

Follow Us!

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.