Skip Navigation LinksHome > July/August 2006 - Volume 27 - Issue 4 > Objective Measurement of Scarring by Multiple Assessors: Is...
Journal of Burn Care & Research:
doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000225963.41796.54
Original Articles

Objective Measurement of Scarring by Multiple Assessors: Is the Tissue Tonometer a Reliable Option?

Corica, Gavin Frank BSc, GradDipSci*; Wigger, Nicholas Charles*; Edgar, Dale Wesley BPhtyHons*†§; Wood, Fiona Melanie FRACS, AM*†‡§; Carroll, Sara BAppSc, MSc*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Depending on the patient population, the incidence of scarring is as great as 75% after burns. Skin pliability and functional recovery are affected negatively by hypertrophic scarring. Therapists use various treatment strategies to improve scar outcomes. However, a simple, objective, clinically useful method of measuring scar response to treatment eludes us. This study examines the inter-rater reliability and validity of scar pliability measures using the modified tissue tonometer (MTT). Twenty-four patients were tested by two blinded, randomly allocated raters. The MTT was used to assess scar pliability with a standardized, repeated-measures design. One normal and up to three scar points were assessed for each subject. One subject was excluded from the data analyses. Concerning inter-rater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient for averaged measures between measurers was 0.957, and the standard error of measurement was 0.025 mm. For validity, a significant difference (P = .0000) between scar (2.64 ± 0.5 mm) and normal tissue (3.23 ± 0.46 mm) measurements was demonstrated. Scar pliability scores between raters are extremely reliable and reproducible using the MTT. It can differentiate between injured and uninjured tissue. Hence, it provides clinicians with a reliable, transportable, and objective tool to document scar outcomes. The MTT provides a standardized method to longitudinally measure scar tissue pliability after burn injury.

© 2006 The American Burn Association

Login

Article Tools

Share