ZINC PASTE BANDAGES WITH COMPRESSION THERAPY
Research has highlighted that zinc-impregnated bandages have been in use since 1854, and their modern-day equivalents are still one of the main treatments for VLUs in conjunction with compression therapy.21 They are made with open-weave bleached cotton and are impregnated with a zinc oxide paste ranging in concentration from 6% to 15%. An early study examined the effect of a zinc oxide dressing on the healing of 18 VLUs and 19 arterial ulcers.22 The randomized double-blind study compared 2 groups: one that used gauze impregnated with zinc oxide and the second that used identical gauze without any topical ointment, on their leg ulcer. In both groups, the size of the ulcer, granulation, and debridement based on 2 treatments over 8 weeks were examined. Patients with venous wounds received additional compression therapy. Although the results showed a better healing rate among the patients who received zinc oxide (83%) compared with the control group (42%), the study’s sample size, short time frame, and mixed wound type limit the generalizability of the results. Also, the study is nearly 30 years old, and newer, more effective wound care products have been developed since the 1980s.
A later randomized controlled study looked at the effectiveness of 2 types of occlusive bandages in treating 34 VLUs.23 This concluded that over 10 weeks there was no difference in the healing rate between an aluminium foil dressing with compression bandaging and an inner stocking impregnated with zinc oxide paste and an outer elastic bandage. Other research compared a zinc oxide–medicated dressing with a hydrocolloid dressing in a prospective, randomized trial over 8 weeks.24 It investigated the effects of both dressing types on the healing rate and pain in both venous and arterial leg ulcers. Compression therapy was applied over the dressings on VLUs only. The study reported a 65% reduction in wound area under adhesive zinc oxide tape compared with a 48% reduction in the size of ulcer when the hydrocolloid dressing was applied. Both wound dressings had similar analgesic effects, but several patients had to withdraw from the study because of a sensitivity reaction to the zinc oxide–medicated dressing treatment. Overall, it concluded that there were insufficient data for the results to be significant as only 31 patients in total participated.
Stacey et al25 examined the effect of 3 different wound dressings on 133 VLUs caused by venous disease. The randomized controlled trial revealed patients treated with a zinc paste bandage had far higher healing rates (79%) than did those who had zinc oxide stockingettes (59%) or a calcium alginate fiber dressing (56%) applied under compression bandaging. However, the authors concluded that healing was mainly attributed to the extra compression that improved venous return and not because of the dressing applied. Others argue that compression bandaging may have masked any beneficial effect that zinc oxide and the other dressings had during healing and recommended more in-depth, explicit research.
Three single-case studies involving the use of zinc paste bandage, in conjunction with K4 compression bandaging, on VLUs demonstrated that zinc paste bandages can be effective in treating VLUs that are difficult to heal.21 Although helpful, this type of clinical practice-based research is low-quality evidence compared with other more rigorously conducted research. The current body of literature points toward the efficacy of zinc paste bandages; however, when applied in conjunction with compression therapy to promote the healing of VLUs, the evidence remains inconclusive.
ZINC-IMPREGNATED BANDAGES AS COMPRESSION THERAPY
Unna boot is a zinc paste–containing bandage, wrapped around the patient’s leg from above the toes to below the knee, which is used to treat VLUs mainly in the United States.26 The first study to examine whether Unna boot, as a form of compression therapy, was as effective as other interventions in promoting the healing of VLUs used a randomized trial.27 It treated 10 patients who had VLUs with Unna boot, whereas 14 patients, also with VLUs, received elastic support stockings. Unfortunately, both treatment groups were small, and the results showed no statistically significant difference between their success in healing the leg ulcers (P = .9394). The average healing time was much shorter for patients who received Unna boot (7.3 weeks), whereas it took on average 18.4 weeks for VLUs to heal for patients who were treated with support stockings.
A subsequent study compared a gel formula dressing plus compression to Unna boot.28 It reported that during the first 4 weeks of therapy healing rates for 30 patients with chronic VLUs were faster with the gel formula dressing plus compression (0.384 ± 0.059 cm2/wk per centimeter perimeter) than for patients using Unna boot (0.135 ± 0.043 cm2/wk per centimeter perimeter). Again at 12 weeks, the results showed the cohort using the gel formula dressing plus compression had better healing rates; however, the results at that stage were not statistically significant (P = .11). Overall, the study concluded that a gel formula dressing with compression may be more effective for promoting the healing of chronic VLUs than Unna boot.
A longitudinal study by Kerstein and Gahtan in 200029 looked at the outcomes of treating VLUs in a home-care versus an outpatient setting. It used 3 types of treatments: (1) a saline gauze dressing, (2) a hydrocolloid dressing, both in conjunction with compression therapy, and (3) Unna boot. Patients with the hydrocolloid dressing had the best results as they had the lowest rates of ulcers, which failed to heal or that recurred at 13%. This was followed closely by Unna boot with a recurrence or failed healing rate of 21%, whereas the saline dressing was the least effective with a rate of 88%.
In 2004, research by Polignano et al30 compared a 4-layer compression bandaging system against Unna boot. This prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial followed 68 patients over 24 weeks. Although the results showed that the ease of applying the 4-layer compression bandaging dressing was rated more highly than Unna boot, there was no significant difference in the time taken for the VLUs to heal. Furthermore, the research was funded by a manufacturer of the compression products, which could have biased the study design and skewed the results in favor of its wound care product. The use of Unna boot is becoming less common as it is being replaced by elastic compression bandaging, which provides sustained pressure, is easier to use, is better shaped for the leg, and does not have to be changed as frequently.31 It is impossible to say if zinc bandages as a form of compression therapy alone are effective in promoting the healing of VLUs, yet it is unlikely given the major advancements in wound dressings and compression bandaging over the last few years.
TOPICAL ZINC OINTMENT AS A SKIN PROTECTANT
Zinc oxide ointment is also used as a barrier film on skin to protect it from wound exudate, reduce inflammation, and stimulate wound healing.32 One study examined the effects of different types of periwound skin protectants on VLUs.33 It compared the effectiveness of using a no-sting barrier film as opposed to a zinc paste compound, as they both help create a barrier film to protect skin surrounding VLUs from irritation and maceration. The randomized controlled trial revealed that there was very little difference, in terms of the decrease in wound size or the healing rate of the ulcers, between the 2 products. The authors did report that nurses found the no-sting barrier film was much faster and easier to apply than the zinc oxide paste, and the no-sting barrier film was preferred from a patient comfort point of view. However, the results are overshadowed by the fact that the research was sponsored by a manufacturer of a no-sting barrier film product, which could have biased the results.
Other research has identified issues with using topical zinc paste as a barrier film. A systematic review and meta-analysis of periwound skin protectants warned that zinc paste can actually obscure the wound margin and make it more difficult to observe.34 In essence, it found no difference between different barrier methods to protect the skin surrounding chronic VLUs. Research has also highlighted the possibility of sensitivity reactions to zinc paste and recommends doing a patch test on patients’ skin first.35 It suggests applying a small amount of zinc paste to normal skin for 3 days, then removing it and doing a follow-up examination of the patients’ skin on day 5 to ensure there is no reaction. Others have stressed that many nurses do not leave the patch test for a long enough period to enable them to accurately determine if the patient has a reaction.36 In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that topical zinc ointment improves the healing of VLUs or better protects the skin surrounding these types of wounds over other products.
Recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management have highlighted the flaws inherent in today’s clinical studies in wound care such as inadequate sample sizes, the lack of randomization or blinding, and poor-quality control groups, to name a few.37 This review has found similar issues with the current empirical evidence on the effectiveness of zinc-based wound products for promoting the healing of VLUs.
The most concerning issue is that the majority of literature on this topic is out of date; only 3 of the 12 research studies reviewed were published within the last decade. Even the most recent evidence from 2008 is already 5 years old and consisted of very low-quality evidence from 3 case studies. Furthermore, newer wound care products and procedures are continuously being developed and tested as is evident from the introduction of 4-layer compression bandaging to manage chronic VLUs. For example, in 2013, a Cochrane review of compression for VLUs found that VLUs heal faster with compression than without and that multicomponent compression systems that include elastic bandages appear to be more effective than single-component systems.38 More up-to-date research is therefore necessary to ensure newer products are taken into account so the effects of a variety of contemporary zinc-based wound products on the healing of VLUs can be investigated. This is essential to ensure healthcare practitioners select the most appropriate dressing for patients that minimizes pain, exudate and odor, and stress and anxiety and shortens the time it takes for them to heal. These improvements will then not only help reduce the cost of treating VLUs but also free up time for clinicians to concentrate on other activities. However, the challenges in conducting clinical studies, such as the high cost and lack of funding, the length of time involved, regulatory and administrative burdens, and a lack of researchers with the necessary expertise, could help explain some of the reasons for the dearth of contemporary research and need to be addressed if high-quality wound management research that will have an impact on practice is to be conducted.39
Another issue is that most of the research is on a small scale, typically with fewer than 42 participants. Although some of the larger studies were able to undertake statistical analysis and produce results with some significance, the majority of them were too small to draw a generalizable conclusion. This is compounded by the fact that the research also applied a variety of design types from randomized clinical trials, to longitudinal studies and case studies, which represents varying levels of quality on the hierarchy of evidence and makes the results of 1 study difficult to assess against another. A further complication is that the literature also examined a diverse range of dressings, such as zinc oxide–impregnated dressings, double-layer elastic adhesive bandages, and zinc oxide stockingettes.
In parallel, the studies also examined several different criteria to rate the effect of the wound dressings, from healing times and rates using various measurements, to the size of the ulcerated area, the presence or absence of granulation, handling properties, patient comfort, and pain levels, to name a few, which makes comparison difficult. The European Wound Management Association has stressed the importance of agreeing on a consistent way to define, measure, and evaluate appropriate interventions and outcomes to improve the quality of clinical studies in wound care.37 Their patient outcome group has designated a set of outcome criteria to help ensure studies are reliable and reproducible. These will help future investigators to design more robust clinical studies that are consistent and comparable.
The inconsistency of the methodological approaches used in the studies makes it impossible to assess the real impact of zinc-based wound products in promoting the healing of chronic VLUs, as no definitive conclusion can be drawn as to their efficacy. Therefore, healthcare professionals are often left to apply their best clinical judgement, as well as anecdotal evidence. And this could delay the wound healing process, causing excess pain and burden to the patient and additional cost and time constraints to healthcare. A review of barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in relation to wound care confirms this and highlights additional factors. These include the practice and experience of individual clinicians being valued over evidence from wound care theory and research, and the lack of training and expertise in research methodologies and techniques among practicing clinicians makes it difficult for them to interpret the evidence and apply it to practice.40
A final point to note is the involvement and sponsorship of industry in some of the research. Although the authors state no such conflict of interest, it is always questionable whether the research was conducted with adequate scientific rigor. Industrial sponsorship has been associated with choosing unsuitable comparators, reporting more favorable analysis, and overall skewed results that favor industry-driven research as opposed to evidence based.41 Others highlight that commercial support for research is also associated with restrictions on publication and data sharing.42 Furthermore, a comparison of industry-sponsored meta-analyses versus Cochrane reviews concluded that research produced with industry support was less transparent, played down the significance of any methodological restrictions, and overall was more favorable than the equivalent Cochrane review.43 Given that the US wound care market was estimated to be worth $820 million in 2012, it is hard not to be skeptical of research backed by industry as they have a vested interest in promoting the widespread use of their wound care products.44 However, there are benefits of research collaboration between academia and industry, such as financial sponsorship to conduct research, a higher number of publications and more evidence for practice,45 new innovations, more patents, and commercially viable products.46
It is clear from the literature reviewed that evidence is insufficient to determine if topical zinc-based wound products are effective in healing VLUs and that more research is needed. Anecdotal evidence from historical practices, small-scale limited research that is outdated, and incorrect assumptions about wound care products based on advertising should not form the knowledge base of healthcare professionals. It must be grounded on high-quality, rigorous scientific, and social science research. Therefore, new research is urgently needed to determine the effect, if any, of topical zinc in healing VLUs.
Future research in this area should focus on larger, high-quality trials to determine the effectiveness of wound dressings on VLUs and should include a priori sample size calculation, have a time to total healing as their primary outcome measure, and include cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life data.3 This would give healthcare professionals more definitive guidance as to what wound products, zinc based or otherwise, to apply to help heal VLUs, reduce patient morbidity, improve quality of life and reduce the costs of healthcare.
In addition, further research should also reconsider the traditional view that compression therapy, whether it is used in conjunction with zinc or not, is the mainstay treatment for VLUs. Contemporary research has shed fresh light on alternative therapies such as pentoxifylline, a drug that improves blood flow. A recent Cochrane systematic review found that it is an effective adjunct to compression bandaging to treat VLUs and may even be effective in the absence of compression therapy.47
Although zinc in all its forms will no doubt continue to be used in the treatment of VLUs, the rationale for this needs to be questioned and investigated through high-quality research. Only wound care practices that are based on sound evidence will make a meaningful long-term impact on the health of patients with VLUs and the healthcare profession.
* Treatment of VLUs currently has a significant impact on US healthcare budgets ($1 billion annually), but this is set to rise because of the graying population trends. Thus, attention to cost-effective VLU wound treatment products is important.
* Zinc-based wound products are marketed as anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial, and they contribute to the wound healing process. However, the implication of their use on patients within clinical practice and health services is unknown.
* Despite the modern drive toward evidence-based practice, the routine use of products such as zinc, which has been in use for over 3000 years, still prevails.
* More contemporary research, that is methodologically sound, is required on the efficacy of zinc-based wound products to inform clinical wound care practices.
* The benefits of industry sponsorship in wound care research should be compared with the potential bias it could introduce into research based on commercial wound care products.
1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers. A National Clinical Guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2010 (SIGN publication 120).
2. Browse NL, Burnand KG. The cause of venous ulceration. Lancet 1982; 2 (8292): 243–5.
3. Palfreyman SJ, Nelson EA, Lochiel R, Michaels JA. Dressings for healing venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst 2006; 3: CD001103.
4. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Nelson EA, Lorimer K, Fisher A. Prevalence of lower-limb ulceration: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Adv Skin Wound Care 2003; 16: 305–16.
5. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Doherty DC, Martin R, Blewett R, Ross F. Prevalence of leg ulceration in a London population. QJM 2004; 97: 431–7.
6. Forssgren A, Fransson I, Nelzen O. Leg ulcer point prevalence can be decreased by broad-scale intervention: a follow-up cross-sectional study of a defined geographical population. Acta Derm Venereol 2008; 88: 252–6.
7. Margolisa DJ, Bilkerb W, Santannab J, Baumgartenc M. Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 381–6.
8. Takahashi PU, Chandra A, Cha SS, Crane SJ. A predictive model for venous ulceration in older adults: results of a retrospective cohort study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2010; 56 (4): 60–6.
10. Iglesias CP, Nelson EA, Cullum N, Torgerson DJVenUS I Collaborators. Economic analysis of VenUS I, a randomized trial of two bandages for treating venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1300–6.
11. Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology 1997; 48 (1): 67–9.
12. Olin JW, Beusterien KM, Childs MB, Seavey C, McHugh L, Griffiths RI. Medical costs of treating venous stasis ulcers: evidence from a retrospective cohort study. Vasc Med 1999; 4 (1): 1–7.
13. Wood CR, Margolis DJ. A cost analysis for the treatment of patients with venous ulceration. Wounds 1994; 4 (1): 138–41.
14. Lansdown AB. Zinc in the healing wound. Lancet 1996; 347 (9003): 706–7.
15. Collins N. Zinc supplementation: yea or nay? Adv Skin Wound Care 2003; 16: 226–30.
16. Shankar AH, Prasad AS. Zinc and immune function: the biological basis of altered resistance to infection. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68 (2 Suppl): 447S–463S.
17. Gray M. Does oral zinc supplementation promote healing of chronic wounds? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2003; 30: 295–9.
18. Henzel JH, de Weese MS, Lichti EL. Zinc concentrations within healing wounds. Significance of postoperative zincuria on availability and requirements during tissue repair. Arch Surg 1970; 100 (4): 349–57.
19. Williams C. Examining the range of medicated and paste impregnated bandages. Br J Nurs 1999; 8: 1019–20.
20. Garrard J. Fundamentals of a Literature Review. Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2007: 15.
21. Parboteeah S, Brown A. Managing chronic venous leg ulcers with zinc oxide paste bandages. Br J Nurs 2008; 17 (6): S30, S32, S34-6.
22. Strömberg HE, Agren MS. Topical zinc oxide treatment improves arterial and venous leg ulcers. Br J Dermatol 1984; 111: 461–8.
23. Eriksson G. Comparison of two occlusive bandages in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Br J Dermatol 1986; 114 (1): 227–30.
24. Brandrup F, Menné T, Agren MS, Stromberg HE, Holst R, Frisén M. A randomised trial of two occlusive dressings in the treatment of leg ulcers. Acta Derm Venereol. 1990; 70: 231–5.
25. Stacey MC, Jopp-Mckay AG, Rashid P, Hoskin SE, Thompson PJ. The influence of dressings on venous ulcer healing—a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13: 174–9.
26. Fletcher A, Cullum N, Sheldon TA. A systematic review of compression treatment for venous leg ulcers. BMJ 1997; 315 (7108): 576–80.
27. Hendricks WM, Swallow BA. Management of stasis leg ulcers with Unna’s boot versus elastic support stockings. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 12 (1): 90–8.
28. Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA, Woodson J, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna’s boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15: 480–6.
29. Kerstein MD, Gahtan V. Outcomes of venous ulcer care: results of a longitudinal study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2000; 46 (6): 22–6.
30. Polignano R, Boneado P, Gasbarro S, Allegra C. A randomised controlled study of four layer compression versus Unna’s boot for venous ulcers. J Wound Care 2004; 13 (1): 21–4.
31. deAraujo T, Valencia T, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Managing the patient with venous ulcers. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 326–34.
32. Rostan EF, de Buys HV, Madey DL, Pinnell SR. Evidence supporting zinc as an important antioxidant for skin. Int J Dermatol 2002; 41: 606–11.
33. Cameron J, Hoffman D, Wilson J, Cherry G. Comparison of two peri-wound skin protectants in venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2005; 14: 233–6.
34. Schuren J, Becker A, Sibbald RG. A liquid film-forming acrylate for peri-wound protection: a systematic review and meta-analysis (3M Cavilon no-sting barrier film). Int Wound J 2005; 2: 230–8.
35. Moffatt C, Martin R, Smithdate R. Leg Ulcer Management. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007: 55.
36. Newton H, Cameron J. A clinical education in wound management. Skin Care in Wound Management. Holsworthy, UK: Medical Communications UK Limited; 2003: 24.
37. Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price PEuropean Wound Management Association Patient Outcome Group. Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management. J Wound Care 2010; 19: 239–68.
38. O’Meara S, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Dumville JC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11:CD000265.
39. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 2003; 289: 1278–87.
40. Flanagan M. Barriers to the implementation of best practice in wound care. Wounds UK 2005; 1 (3): 74–82.
41. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003; 326 (7400): 1167–70.
42. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 454–65.
43. Jorgensen AW, Hilden J, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review. BMJ 2006; 333 (7572): 782.
45. Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Nancyanne C, Seashore K. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1734–9.
46. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 454–65.
47. Jull AB, Arroll B, Parag V, Waters J. Pentoxifylline for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD001733.
Keywords:© 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. All world rights reserved.
venous leg ulcer; topical zinc; zinc oxide; wound care