Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections CE For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2005 - Volume 18 - Issue 8 > Skin Care Protocols for Pressure Ulcers and Incontinence in...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Advances in Skin & Wound Care:
October 2005 - Volume 18 - Issue 8 - pp 422-429
Features: Original Investigations

Skin Care Protocols for Pressure Ulcers and Incontinence in Long-Term Care: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Thompson, Patricia MS, RN; Langemo, Diane PhD, RN, FAAN; Anderson, Julie PhD, RN, CCRC; Hanson, Darlene MS, RN; Hunter, Susan MSN, RN

Collapse Box

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on pressure ulcer prevalence, incidence, and healing time of incorporating use of a specific body wash and a skin protectant into skin care protocols that are based on guidelines from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

DESIGN: Quasi-experimental intervention study.

SETTING: 2 rural long-term-care facilities.

PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 136 residents at 2 rural long-term-care facilities during a 3-month preintervention and a 3-month postintervention period.

INTERVENTIONS: A 3-month preintervention observation period (baseline) was followed by a staff in-service session, in which the use of a body wash and a skin protectant was introduced into skin care protocols, and a 3-month postintervention observation period. The skin care protocols included skin assessment techniques, prevention and treatment strategies for Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers, and management of incontinence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in the occurrence and healing time of Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers before and after introduction of use of a body wash and a skin protectant into skin care protocols and the occurrence rate of urinary and fecal incontinence.

RESULTS: Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers significantly decreased from 35 preintervention to 14 postintervention (t = 19.48, df = 47, P = .05). The prevalence of pressure ulcers preintervention was 11.3%, compared with 4.8% postintervention (t = 2.47, df = 1.0, P = .24), The change in the incidence of pressure ulcers was significant (t = 8.48, df = -2.0, P = .01), with 32.7% preintervention and 8.9% postintervention. Healing time for pressure ulcers ranged from 4 to 70 days preintervention (mean [M] = 22.72 ± 18.25) to 6 to 49 days postintervention (M = 16.0 ± 12.93). The decrease in pressure ulcer healing time (rapid, medium, and long) preintervention to postintervention was statistically significant (χ2 = 14.9, P = .001). The presence of fecal and urinary incontinence was significantly associated with the development of Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers (χ2= 44.8, P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of skin care protocols that included use of a body wash and a skin protectant reduced the incidence of Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers and decreased healing time. The skin protectant and body wash used in the protocols were found to be effective in preventing and treating Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers.

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?