Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2006 - Volume 57 - Issue 1 > Hand Knife Versus Powered Dermatome: Current Opinions, Pract...
Annals of Plastic Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000214902.79193.4e
Original Article

Hand Knife Versus Powered Dermatome: Current Opinions, Practices, and Evidence

Tehrani, Hamid MBBS, MRCSEd; Lindford, Andrew MBBS, MRCSEd; Logan, Andrew M. FRCS

Collapse Box

Abstract

Some surgeons prefer to use powered dermatomes when harvesting split-thickness skin grafts, while others prefer the hand knife. We conducted a postal survey of British plastic surgery units, contacted medicolegal departments, and investigated the literature to explore the reasoning for any preferences and the existing evidence to support such practices.

Two hundred thirty-eight surgeons from 30 units replied, 145 (61%) preferring to use the powered dermatome, primarily as they believed it provided for better-quality graft and donor sites. Ninety-five (40%) respondents felt they were potentially open to successful litigation by using a hand knife when a powered dermatome was available.

We found no evidence to support such clinical or medicolegal views and conclude that numerous misconceptions exist about skin-graft harvesting instruments. We suggest that surgeons should use whichever instrument they feel will, in their hands, provide the optimum result and not be directed by unfounded opinions.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.