Annals of Plastic Surgery

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2003 - Volume 50 - Issue 1 > Characteristics of Women With Cosmetic Breast Implants Compa...
Annals of Plastic Surgery:
January 2003 - Volume 50 - Issue 1 - pp 6-12
Original Articles

Characteristics of Women With Cosmetic Breast Implants Compared With Women With Other Types of Cosmetic Surgery and Population-Based Controls in Denmark

Kjøller, Kim MD; Hölmich, Lisbet R. MD; Fryzek, Jon P. PhD; Jacobsen, Poul Harboe MD; Friis, Søren MD; McLaughlin, Joseph K. PhD; Lipworth, Loren ScD; Henriksen, Trine F. MD; Jørgensen, Signe MD; Bittmann, Sven MD; Olsen, Jørgen H. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Herein the authors describe characteristics of women with breast implants compared with women with other types of cosmetic surgery as well as population controls. All women who acquired breast implants from 1977 to 1997 were identified from the files of two private plastic surgery clinics in Denmark. Patient characteristics were obtained through a self-administered questionnaire. The magnitude of differences between patient and control groups was estimated using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Women with breast implants had a significantly lower body mass index and reported a two-fold greater incidence of current smoking compared with women from the general population and compared with women with other cosmetic surgery. Women with implants reported a greater number of full-term pregnancies and were less likely than controls to have had their first birth at age 30 years or older. Women with implants were not more likely than women in either control group to report a history of diseases, including connective tissue diseases, cancer, or depression before their implant surgery. Women with cosmetic breast implants differ from women with other forms of cosmetic surgery and from general population controls with respect to several characteristics that may importantly influence health outcomes and that need to be addressed in future breast implant studies.

© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.