Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the impact of a surgical comanagement (SCM) hospitalist program on patient outcomes at an academic institution.
Background: Prior studies may have underestimated the impact of SCM due to methodological shortcomings.
Methods: This is a retrospective study utilizing a propensity score-weighted intervention (n = 16,930) and control group (n = 3695). Patients were admitted between January 2009 to July 2012 (pre-SCM) and September 2012 to September 2013 (post-SCM) to Orthopedic or Neurosurgery at our institution. Using propensity score methods, linear regression, and a difference-in-difference approach, we estimated changes in outcomes between pre and post periods, while adjusting for confounding patient characteristics.
Results: The SCM intervention was associated with a significant differential decrease in the proportion of patients with at least 1 medical complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–0.96; P = 0.008), the proportion of patients with length of stay at least 5 days (OR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84; P < 0.001), 30-day readmission rate for medical cause (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52–0.81; P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with at least 2 medical consultants (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49–0.63; P < 0.001). There was no significant change in patient satisfaction (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.87–1.33; P = 0.507). We estimated average savings of $2642 to $4303 per patient in the post-SCM group. The overall provider satisfaction with SCM was 88.3%.
Conclusions: The SCM intervention reduces medical complications, length of stay, 30-day readmissions, number of consultants, and cost of care.
*Division of General Medical Disciplines, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
†Department of Quality, Patient Safety, and Clinical Effectiveness, Stanford Health Care, CA.
Reprints: Nidhi Rohatgi, MD, 300 Pasteur Drive, HCO32D, Mail Code 5278, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Conflicts of interest: None declared by any of the authors.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.annalsofsurgery.com).