You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Multicenter Evaluation of Rectal cancer ReImaging pOst Neoadjuvant (MERRION) Therapy

Hanly, Ann M. MD*; Ryan, Elizabeth M. MB, BCh, BAO; Rogers, Ailín C. MB, BCh, BAO*; McNamara, Deborah A. MD; Madoff, Robert D. MD; Winter, Desmond C. MD, FRCSI*

Annals of Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828f6c91
Original Articles
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of reimaging rectal cancer post-CRT (chemoradiotherapy) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvis for local staging and computed tomography of thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (CT TAP) to identify distant metastases.

Background: The success of neoadjuvant CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer has changed an already complex management algorithm. There is no consensus whether patients should be restaged before surgery.

Methods: Data from 5 institutions with prospectively maintained databases including patients who received neoadjuvant CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer were acquired. Only patients who had been staged pre- and post-CRT with MR imaging and CT TAP were included. MR findings were correlated with histopathological stage using weighted κ (kappa) statistics to test agreement, where a κ value of less than 0.5 was deemed unacceptable.

Results: A total of 285 patients fulfilled the criteria for the study; 84% had American Joint Committee for Cancer stage 3 disease pre-CRT, and the remainder had stage 2 disease. Fourteen patients did not proceed to surgery post-CRT—2 were observed as “complete responders,” and the remainder either had unresectable disease or were unfit for surgery. MR imaging could not predict T stage (κ = 0.212) or nodal involvement (κ = 0.336). Most pertinently, MR imaging was unable to detect a complete pathological response (κ = 0.021), nor could it discriminate T4 disease (κ = 0.445). CT TAP restaging altered management in 6.7% of patients, who had metastatic disease.

Conclusions: MR reimaging using standard protocols is of limited value in determining surgical approaches; a better modality of local restaging is required.

In Brief

This multicenter study evaluated the utility of restaging 269 patients with rectal cancer post-CRT (chemoradiotherapy). Computed tomography of thorax, abdomen and pelvis post-CRT may identify patients with new metastases. Magnetic resonance reimaging using standard protocols is unable to locally stage rectal cancer post-CRT.

Author Information

*Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland

Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Address Correspondence and reprint request to: Desmond C. Winter, MD, FRCSI, Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland; E-mail: deswinter@gmail.com.

A.M.H. and E.M.R. contributed equally to the study. The MERRION study group (members are listed under acknowledgments) contributed a lot to the study.

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.