Annals of Surgery

Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2014 - Volume 259 - Issue 4 > Multicenter Evaluation of Rectal cancer ReImaging pOst Neoad...
Annals of Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828f6c91
Original Articles

Multicenter Evaluation of Rectal cancer ReImaging pOst Neoadjuvant (MERRION) Therapy

Hanly, Ann M. MD*; Ryan, Elizabeth M. MB, BCh, BAO; Rogers, Ailín C. MB, BCh, BAO*; McNamara, Deborah A. MD; Madoff, Robert D. MD; Winter, Desmond C. MD, FRCSI*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of reimaging rectal cancer post-CRT (chemoradiotherapy) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvis for local staging and computed tomography of thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (CT TAP) to identify distant metastases.

Background: The success of neoadjuvant CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer has changed an already complex management algorithm. There is no consensus whether patients should be restaged before surgery.

Methods: Data from 5 institutions with prospectively maintained databases including patients who received neoadjuvant CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer were acquired. Only patients who had been staged pre- and post-CRT with MR imaging and CT TAP were included. MR findings were correlated with histopathological stage using weighted κ (kappa) statistics to test agreement, where a κ value of less than 0.5 was deemed unacceptable.

Results: A total of 285 patients fulfilled the criteria for the study; 84% had American Joint Committee for Cancer stage 3 disease pre-CRT, and the remainder had stage 2 disease. Fourteen patients did not proceed to surgery post-CRT—2 were observed as “complete responders,” and the remainder either had unresectable disease or were unfit for surgery. MR imaging could not predict T stage (κ = 0.212) or nodal involvement (κ = 0.336). Most pertinently, MR imaging was unable to detect a complete pathological response (κ = 0.021), nor could it discriminate T4 disease (κ = 0.445). CT TAP restaging altered management in 6.7% of patients, who had metastatic disease.

Conclusions: MR reimaging using standard protocols is of limited value in determining surgical approaches; a better modality of local restaging is required.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.