Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2014 - Volume 259 - Issue 3 > Chronic Subdural Hematoma Management: A Systematic Review an...
Annals of Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000255
Meta-Analysis

Chronic Subdural Hematoma Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 34829 Patients

Almenawer, Saleh A. MD*; Farrokhyar, Forough PhD; Hong, Chris BSc; Alhazzani, Waleed MD§; Manoranjan, Branavan BSc; Yarascavitch, Blake MD*; Arjmand, Parnian MSc; Baronia, Benedicto MD*; Reddy, Kesava MD*; Murty, Naresh MD*; Singh, Sheila PhD

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of multiple treatment modalities for the management of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients.

Background: Current management strategies of CSDHs remain widely controversial. Treatment options vary from medical therapy and bedside procedures to major operative techniques.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed and Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, Google scholar, and the Cochrane library from January 1970 through February 2013 for randomized and observational studies reporting one or more outcome following the management of symptomatic patients with CSDH. Independent reviewers evaluated the quality of studies and abstracted the data on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous bedside twist-drill drainage, single or multiple operating room burr holes, craniotomy, corticosteroids as a main or adjuvant therapy, use of drains, irrigation of the hematoma cavity, bed rest, and treatment of recurrences following CSDH management. Mortality, morbidity, cure, and recurrence rates were examined for each management option. Randomized, prospective, retrospective, and overall observational studies were analyzed separately. Pooled estimates, confidence intervals (CIs), and relative risks (RRs) were calculated for all outcomes using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 34,829 patients from 250 studies met our eligibility criteria. Sixteen trials were randomized, and the remaining 234 were observational. We included our unpublished single center series of 834 patients. When comparing percutaneous bedside drainage to operating room burr hole evacuation, there was no significant difference in mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46–1.05; P = 0.09), morbidity (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.2–1.01; P = 0.05), cure (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98–1.11; P = 0.15), and recurrence rates (RR, 1; 95% CI, 0.66–1.52; P = 0.99). Higher morbidity was associated with the adjuvant use of corticosteroids (RR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.54–2.45; P = 0.005), with no significant improvement in recurrence and cure rates. The use of drains following CSDH drainage resulted in a significant decrease in recurrences (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.76; P = 0.002). Craniotomy was associated with higher complication rates if considered initially (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04–1.74; P = 0.01); however, craniotomy was superior to minimally invasive procedures in the management of recurrences (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05–0.85; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Percutaneous bedside twist-drill drainage is a relatively safe and effective first-line management option. These findings may result in potential health cost savings and eliminate perioperative risks related to general anesthetic.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.