Background: Surgeons may be reluctant to withdraw postoperative life support after a poor outcome.
Methods: A cross-sectional random sample was taken from a US mail survey of 2100 surgeons who routinely perform high-risk operations. We used a hypothetical vignette of a specialty-specific operation complicated by a hemiplegic stroke and respiratory failure. On postoperative day 7, the patient and family requested withdrawal of life-supporting therapy. We experimentally modified the timing and role of surgeon error to assess their influence on surgeons' willingness to withdraw life-supporting care.
Results: The adjusted response rate was 56%. Sixty-three percent of respondents would not honor the request to withdraw life-supporting treatment. Willingness to withdraw life-support was significantly lower in the setting of surgeon error (33% vs 41%, P < 0.008) and elective operations rather than in emergency cases (33% vs 41%, P = 0.01). After adjustment for specialty, years of experience, geographic region, and gender, odds of withdrawing life-supporting therapy were significantly greater in cases in which the outcome was not explicitly from error during an emergency operation as compared to iatrogenic injury in elective cases (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence intervals 1.26–3.01). Surgeons who did not withdraw life-support were significantly more likely to report the importance of optimism regarding prognosis (79% vs 62%, P < 0.0001) and concern that the patient could not accurately predict future quality of life (80% vs 68%, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Surgeons are more reluctant to withdraw postoperative life-supporting therapy for patients with complications from surgeon error in the elective setting. This may also be influenced by personal optimism and a belief that patients are unable to predict the value of future health states.
We experimentally modified the timing and role of surgeon error to assess their influence on surgeons' willingness to withdraw life-supporting care. Surgeons are more reluctant to withdraw postoperative life-supporting therapy for patients with complications from surgeon error in the elective setting.
*Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin. Madison, WI
†University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
‡Department of Surgery, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
§Department of Medicine and MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL
‖Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL.
Reprints: Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, MPP, G5/315 CSC, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. E-mail: email@example.com.
Disclosure: Dr Schwarze is supported by a Greenwall Faculty Scholars Award and the Department of Surgery at the University of Wisconsin. Mr Redmann is supported by a Shapiro Summer Research Award from the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. Dr Alexander is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (RO1 HS0189960). These funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript for publication.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.annalsofsurgery.com).