Home Current Issue Previous Issues Blogs Online First ASA Practice Parameters CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2006 - Volume 105 - Issue 1 > Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: Can the Risk of Entering...
Anesthesiology:
July 2006 - Volume 105 - Issue 1 - pp 9-13
Clinical Investigations

Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: Can the Risk of Entering the Spinal Canal Be Reduced?: A Study of Needle Angles in Volunteers Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Sardesai, Anand M. F.R.C.A.*; Patel, Roger F.R.C.R.†; Denny, Nicholas M. F.R.C.A.‡; Menon, David K. F.R.C.A.§; Dixon, Adrian K. F.R.C.R.∥; Herrick, Martin J. F.R.C.A.*; Harrop-Griffiths, Alan W. F.R.C.A.#

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord damage during interscalene brachial plexus block has been attributed to needle entry into the spinal canal. The purpose of this study was to identify the angles and depths of needle insertion that increase the likelihood of such an event, using the traditional classic interscalene approach and two more proximal entry points.
Method: Magnetic resonance images of the neck from 10 healthy volunteers were used to obtain the three-dimensional spatial coordinates of three skin markers and the right-sided cervical nerves at the exiting neural foramina. The distance of the intervertebral foramina from the skin markers and the angles of the needle vector and the foramina were calculated.
Results: The distance from the skin to the intervertebral foramen may be as short as 2.5 cm with the classic approach. A caudal angulation greater than 50° seemed to eliminate the risk of needle entry through the foramen.
Conclusion: With the classic approach to the interscalene block, there is a greater possibility of the needle passing through the intervertebral foramen if the needle is advanced too deeply. More proximal entry points and techniques that use a more steeply angled needle may reduce the risk of entry into the spinal space.

© 2006 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login




Help

Forgot Password?