Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2013 - Volume 119 - Issue 4 > Isoflurane in Contrast to Propofol Promotes Fluid Extravasat...
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829ab018
Perioperative Medicine

Isoflurane in Contrast to Propofol Promotes Fluid Extravasation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Pigs

Brekke, Hege Kristin M.D.*; Hammersborg, Stig Morten M.D.*; Lundemoen, Steinar M.D.; Mongstad, Arve R.P.P.; Kvalheim, Venny Lise M.D., Ph.D.§; Haugen, Oddbjørn M.D., Ph.D.; Husby, Paul M.D., Ph.D.#

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box


Background: A highly positive intraoperative fluid balance should be prevented as it negatively impacts patient outcome. Analysis of volume-kinetics has identified an increase in interstitial fluid volume after crystalloid fluid loading during isoflurane anesthesia. Isoflurane has also been associated with postoperative hypoxemia and may be associated with an increase in alveolar epithelial permeability, edema formation, and hindered oxygen exchange. In this article, the authors compare fluid extravasation rates before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with isoflurane- versus propofol-based anesthesia.
Methods: Fourteen pigs underwent 2 h of tepid CPB with propofol (P-group; n = 7) or isoflurane anesthesia (I-group; n = 7). Fluid requirements, plasma volume, colloid osmotic pressures in plasma and interstitial fluid, hematocrit levels, and total tissue water content were recorded, and fluid extravasation rates calculated.
Results: Fluid extravasation rates increased in the I-group from the pre-CPB level of 0.27 (0.13) to 0.92 (0.36) ml·kg−1·min−1, but remained essentially unchanged in the P-group with significant between-group differences during CPB (pb = 0.002). The results are supported by corresponding changes in interstitial colloid osmotic pressure and total tissue water content.
Conclusions: During CPB, isoflurane, in contrast to propofol, significantly contributes to a general increase in fluid shifts from the intravascular to the interstitial space with edema formation and a possible negative impact on postoperative organ function.
Back to Top | Article Outline

What We Already Know about This Topic

* The use of cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery may be associated with significant peri- and postoperative fluid loading and edema formation
* This study determined the transvascular fluid shift during cardiopulmonary bypass using isoflurane- versus propofol-based general anesthesia in a porcine model
Back to Top | Article Outline

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

* Isoflurane, in contrast to propofol, during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with a greater increase in fluid extravasation from the intravascular to the interstitial space, resulting in dilution of interstitial fluid and a decrease in interstitial colloid osmotic pressure
THE use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during cardiac surgery is well known to be associated with significant postoperative fluid loading and edema formation1 that occasionally contribute to myocardial, pulmonary, and splanchnic organ dysfunction. Restrictive perioperative fluid therapy during open heart surgery seems to be associated with improved postoperative organ function and recovery,2 decreased incidence of postoperative complications,3 and probably, shorter hospital stays in contrast to highly positive intraoperative fluid balance (>5 l) that has been associated with an adverse outcome.3
Factors contributing to fluid overloading during CPB and concomitant cardiac surgery are hemodilution,4 the presence of a general inflammatory reaction related to contact between blood and foreign surfaces of the CPB circuit,5 and the use of different levels of hypothermia1,6 together with applied CPB-perfusion flow rate7 and flow pattern (pulsatile/nonpulsatile).8 Finally, the applied anesthetic technique may play a role in fluid homeostasis during anesthesia and surgery.
Numerous studies have been focused on changes in vascular permeability caused by volatile anesthetic agents.9 Volume kinetic analysis after crystalloid fluid loading has identified an increase in interstitial fluid volume, during isoflurane anesthesia.10 An isoflurane-related increase of the alveolar epithelial permeability and an increase of transendothelial albumin permeability have been observed after administration of isoflurane, but not with sevoflurane.11,12 Similarly, administration of isoflurane (1–3%) has been shown to contribute to an opening of the blood–brain barrier.13
In a prospective observational study on incidence and risk factors of post-CPB hypoxemia by Weiss et al.14 significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios were observed 1 and 6 h following CPB only in patients with isoflurane anesthesia and not when an alternative anesthetic, enflurane, was administered. Recently, the authors commented that isoflurane-induced interstitial edema probably could have contributed to their previous observation.15
Volatile anesthetics are commonly used during CPB to maintain anesthesia and control arterial blood pressure. By lowering the systemic vascular resistance, they may interfere with the driving forces of the Starling equation controlling microvascular fluid- and protein-shifts between the vascular and the interstitial compartments. Theoretically, all these agents can increase the capillary hydrostatic pressure. Fluid retention seems, however, to be more associated with isoflurane than with enflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol.11,15,16
The current study was undertaken to describe in more detail the transvascular fluid shift during CPB with isoflurane- as compared with propofol-based general anesthesia in a porcine model. The animal model has previously been used in numerous studies on CPB and fluid homeostasis under normothermic, tepid, and hypothermic conditions.1,4,6,7
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

Animal Handling and Anesthesia
Fourteen immature domestic pigs, approximately 3 months old, of either sex, (Norwegian landrace Norhybrid; Stend Agricultural College, Bergen, Norway) were studied. The animals were acclimatized for at least 1 week in our laboratory housing area before the experiments. The anesthetic and experimental protocols were approved by the local laboratory animal veterinarian (Vivarium, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway) under surveillance of the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (Oslo, Norway) and in accordance with national and international laws and regulations. Food was withdrawn 12 h before the study. Water was available at all times.
Anesthesia was carried out with preanesthetic medication of 500 mg of ketamine, 10 mg of diazepam, and 1 mg of atropine given as an intramuscular injection.17 Thirty minutes later, general anesthesia was induced via a face mask with isoflurane in oxygen. After insertion of an ear vein catheter, anesthesia was supplemented by 5 mg/kg of thiopental intravenously before intubation of the trachea (blue line oral tube ID 6.0; Mallinckrodt, Covidien, Dublin, Ireland). All animals were thereafter ventilated (volume controlled) to an end-tidal carbon dioxide level of approximately 5.0 kPa. Anesthesia was maintained according to their study group allocation.
A midline sternotomy was performed and preparation for extracorporeal circulation was done. In parallel, arterial and venous lines for continuous monitoring of systemic arterial pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) were placed in the right femoral artery plus femoral vein and the right atrium (18-gauge; Secalone-TY™, BD Medical, Singapore, Singapore). A urinary bladder catheter was inserted via a midline mini-laparotomy. Surgery was normally completed within 20 min. All animals were thereafter allowed for 60-min stabilization before they underwent 120 min of tepid CPB.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Study Design and Groups
Fourteen animals were randomized into two study groups, the isoflurane-group (I-group; n = 7) and the propofol-group (P-group; n = 7). In the I-group, anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of 1.3% isoflurane in 50% oxygen in air. Adjustments in the inspired isoflurane concentration were allowed in the range of 0.5–2.0 vol%. During CPB, isoflurane 0.5% was added to the machine oxygenator. In the P-group, an infusion of propofol (Propolipid®; Fresenius Kabi, Stockholm, Sweden) was started at a level of 10–20 mg·kg−1·h−1. During the experiments, the dose was adjusted to 6 mg·kg−1·h−1 to maintain mean arterial blood pressure in the range of 50–80 mmHg, similar to that obtained with isoflurane. If necessary, repeated boluses of propofol were administered. Both study groups received a continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl (7.5 μg·kg−1·h−1) and midazolam (0.5 mg·kg−1·h−1) according to a previous published protocol.18 To avoid shivering during tepid CPB, all animals received an additional infusion of pancuronium of 0.45 μg·kg−1·h−1.
Acetated Ringer’s solution (5 ml·kg−1·h−1) was administered as a maintenance fluid throughout the experiments in both study groups. Blood loss was substituted by the use of acetated Ringer’s solution in volumes three times the recorded blood loss. During CPB, bleeding to the open chest was returned to circulation via the extracorporeal machine reservoir.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Cannulation for CPB was established in the ascending aorta and the right atrium with a 18-French aortic arch elongated one-piece arterial cannula (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and a 32-French single-stage venous drainage cannula (TF-032-L; Research Medical Inc., Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, CA) connected to standard equipment for open heart surgery. A membrane oxygenator with reservoir and integrated heat exchanger (Quadrox, hollow fibre membrane oxygenator with heat exchanger and venous hardshell cardiotomy reservoir, VHK 4200; Jostra AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) was used. Pump flow was set to 2.7 l·m−2·min−1. Once the calculated CPB flow rate was achieved, ventricular fibrillation was induced with a 9 V DC battery set onto the right ventricle to obtain constant and controlled total body perfusion. CPB pump head pressures were in the range of 200–250 mmHg, and nonpulsatile flow was used. Inline arterial and venous measurement of oxygen tension was performed with a PO2 monitor (Terumo CDI 500 in-line Blood Parameter Monitor System; Terumo Cardiovascular System Corp., Tustin, CA).
Before starting CPB, heparin 6 mg/kg body weight was administered intravenously, and after 1 h, an additional 3 mg/kg was given. Throughout the experiments, there was a constant fixed height difference (73 ± 3 cm) between the level of the machine reservoir and the site of venous drainage (the right atrium).
Body temperature was allowed to drift during CPB. Nasopharyngeal, rectal, and pulmonary artery temperatures were measured continuously.
The priming volume of the CPB circuit was 1,115 ml of acetated Ringer’s solution which regularly resulted in a filling of the machine reservoir to a level of 400 ml. This level was used as a fluid gauge. Changes in this level indicated loss or gain of fluid from circulation to the interstitial space or changes in vascular tone. Whenever the level of the reservoir decreased, acetated Ringer’s solution was added to restore the 400-ml level.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Hemodynamic Variables
Heart rate monitoring was obtained using surface electrocardiography electrodes. Mean arterial pressure and CVP from the femoral vein (CVPfem.) and the right atrium (CVPr.atr.) were recorded continuously using fluid-filled catheters connected to pressure transducers (Transpac II; Abbott Critical Care Systems, Sligo, Ireland) linked to a Hewlett Packard 78353A-monitor (Louisville, KY).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Blood Analyses and Plasma Colloid Osmotic Pressure
Blood samples were drawn from the arterial line for determination of hematocrit, plasma colloid osmotic pressure (COPp), serum albumin, serum total protein and serum electrolyte concentrations, and acid–base parameters. Hematocrit was determined using standard hematocrit tubes centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. Serum albumin and serum total protein concentrations were analyzed in an automatic analyzer (Technicon Chem. Systems; Technicon, Pittsburg, PA) by colorimetry and by the biuretic reaction, respectively.
COPp was measured together with interstitial COP (COPi) with a colloid osmometer using a semi-permeable membrane with a cutoff level at 10.000 Da (Amicon Inc., Beverly, MA) with acetated Ringer’s solution in the reference chamber. The osmometer was designed to accept 5-μl sample volumes. Pressure was measured by a pressure transducer (Gould-Statham; Spectramed Inc., Levis Centre, Mount Vernon, OH) connected to a recorder (Easy-Graph 240; Gould Electronics Inc., Eastlake, OH).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Sampling of Interstitial Fluid
For determination of COPi, fluid was sampled by means of multifilamentous nylon wicks (Number 18; Norsk Fletteri, Bergen, Norway). The wicks were soaked in acetated Ringer’s solution before insertion. They were sewn into lateral abdominal skin folds by means of a straight suture needle (Acufirm 214/1, Dreieich, Germany) and placed subcutaneously at lengths of 8–10 cm. The protruding ends of the wicks were covered with an adhesive plastic film (Tegaderm, 3M Inc., London, Ontario, Canada) to prevent fluid loss by evaporation. The wicks were left in situ for 60 min, and after that they were pulled out swiftly and placed under mineral oil in centrifuge tubes.18,19 Wick fluid (5–15 μl) was collected after centrifugation. Blood contamination in wicks was judged visually when removing each wick from the animal. Only white wicks were accepted.
Wick fluid from three implantation periods, before and twice during CPB, was analyzed.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Blood Volume Determination with the Carbon Monoxide Method
Erythrocytes volume and plasma volume (PV) were determined just before starting CPB by an indicator dilution technique using carbon monoxide as label.20 Subsequent erythrocytes volume and PV were calculated every 30 min from recorded loss of blood and repeated determination of hematocrit. To assess the real in vivo PV of the animals during CPB, the calculated PV was corrected according to the following equation:
PV in the animal (ml) = PV calculated (ml) − PV in the CPB circuit (ml)
Back to Top | Article Outline
Fluid Loss and Supplementation, Fluid Extravasation
Urine output was recorded every half hour via a suprapubic catheter. All fluids administered to the animal were recorded including fluid additions to the machine reservoir during CPB. Net fluid balance (NFB), i.e., all fluid additions minus diuresis and blood losses during CPB, was calculated for every interval of 30 min. NFB was used together with changes in PV (ΔPV) to calculate fluid extravasation (ml/kg) during a given time interval according to the formula:
Fluidextravasation = NFB (ml/kg) − ΔPV (ml/kg)
Fluid extravasation rate (FER in ml·kg−1·min−1) was obtained by dividing fluid extravasation to the relevant time interval.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Total Tissue Water Content
At the end of each experiment, the pigs were sacrified by an intravenous injection of 20 ml of saturated KCl solution. Immediately thereafter, tissue samples (3 parallel pieces) were taken simultaneously from left quadriceps muscle, abdominal skin, colon, ileum, stomach, liver, pancreas, kidney, lung, heart, and brain. All samples were placed in preweighed vials, reweighed, and transferred to a drying chamber at 70°C. In the subsequent days, the vials were weighed repeatedly until stable weight. Total tissue water (TTW) was recorded as weight reduction in gram per gram dry weight. The values of the I-group and the P-group were compared with TTW values from a historic control group of 13 comparable pigs that never underwent CPB and were killed immediately after induction of pentobarbital anesthesia.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The results are presented as mean with SD in parentheses. A repeated measure ANOVA with one within-factor (time) and one between-factor (group) was used to analyze each of the variables in table 1 (hemodynamic parameters and PV), table 2 (laboratory parameters), and in the figures (fig. 1: hematocrit, COPp, and interstitial fluid; fig. 2: NFB and FER). If the within-factor P value (PTime) was less than 0.05, a multiple comparison procedure, according to Bonferroni’s method, was conducted. Only the P value (Ppost hoc) based on the comparison between the mean value at pre-CPB and at 120 min is presented in tables 1 and 2 and in figure 1. In figure 2, the comparison between the mean value at pre-CPB and during CPB was performed. Furthermore, a two-sample t test (pb) was performed to compare the two groups at different time points (60 and 120 min). This was only done if the interaction P value (PGroup × Time) was less than 0.05.
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
For the variables given in table 3, the one-way ANOVA was used to test the differences between three independent groups, followed by a Tukey post hoc test if a significant between-group P value was obtained. The chosen level of significance was set to 0.05.
Back to Top | Article Outline


The animals of the study groups were comparable with respect to age, mean (SD): 89.9 (19.8) versus 93.0 (10.8) days, weight: 32.6 (2.2) versus 32.1 (2.3) kg, and sex: male/female: 5/2 versus 5/2, I-group versus P-group, respectively. The body core temperature was allowed to drift in both study groups from a normothermic to a tepid level during the experiments. The temperature at baseline (pulmonary artery) was 38.3° (0.6) and 38.5°C (0.6); at 30 min CPB, 36.7° (0.6) and 36.4°C (0.5); and at 120 min CPB, 36.3° (0.5) and 36.3°C (0.5), I-group versus P-group, respectively.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Hemodynamics, Plasma Volume, Colloid Osmotic Pressures
Mean arterial pressure, CVPfem., CVPr.atr., systemic vascular resistance, and PV before and during CPB are displayed in table 1. The animals remained hemodynamically stable for all parameters during the experiments with no between-group differences (table 1).
Similarly, no significant between-group differences were obtained in the investigated laboratory parameters (table 2) including hematocrit and COPp (fig. 1, A and B). In both groups, a slight increase was observed in the s-chloride concentration during the experiments, whereas s-albumin and s-protein concentrations (table 2) together with hematocrit and COPp (fig. 1, A and B) decreased after initiation of CPB related to hemodilution.
COPi decreased significantly in the I-group after starting CPB, whereas COPi remained stable throughout the experiments in the P-group. After 60 min of CPB, COPi was significantly lower in the I-group (P = 0.009) as compared with the P-group (fig. 1C).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Net Fluid Balance, Fluid Extravasation, and TTW content
NFB in the P-group showed a modest increase from 0.16 (0.09) ml·kg−1·min−1 before CPB to 0.40 (0.29) ml·kg−1·min−1 during CPB. NFB in the I-group increased from a similar value of 0.11 (0.02) ml·kg−1·min−1 before CPB to 0.84 (0.30) ml·kg−1·min−1 during CPB. During CPB, significant between-group differences in NFB were observed with the higher values in the I-group (pb = 0.014; fig. 2A).
Fluid losses from circulation to the interstitial space presented as FER in ml·kg−1·min−1 are presented in figure 2B. FER in the I-group and P-group before CPB was 0.27 (0.13) and 0.28 (0.17) ml·kg−1·min−1, respectively. During CPB, FER remained unchanged at 0.32 (0.19) ml·kg−1·min-1 in the P-group, whereas an increase to a level of 0.92 (0.36) ml·kg−1·min−1 was observed in the I-group. The FER values of the I-group were significantly higher than the values of the P-group during CPB (pb = 0.002; fig. 2B).
TTW of the different organs studied is presented in table 3. For comparison, all values were compared with historic control data obtained from our laboratory comparable pigs that never underwent CPB and were sacrified immediately after initiation of anesthesia. TTW of the P-group was increased in some of the gastrointestinal organs and the heart when compared with the control animals. The I-group showed an increase in TTW in most organs when compared with the control animals. Comparison of the two study groups revealed higher water content in the kidneys, stomach, intestine, skeletal muscle, and skin of the I-group (table 3).
Back to Top | Article Outline


In the current study, isoflurane was compared with propofol in an established experimental model for studies on fluid homeostasis and fluid shifts during CPB. This study confirms the hypothesis that general anesthesia with isoflurane, in contrast to propofol, contributes to a significant, in fact three-fold, increase in the FER affecting most tissues and organs during CPB. Hematocrit, COPp, and s-protein concentrations were similar in the two study groups indicating that different degrees of hemodilution could not explain the results. Furthermore, no differences in temperature were present excluding hypothermia as an explanation for the fluid accumulation seen in the I-group.
The increase in FER is reflected by significant dilution of the interstitial fluid after initiation of CPB with a decrease in COPi in the animals given isoflurane, whereas COPi remained unchanged and stable in the propofol-treated animals.
Similarly, changes in TTW in the I-group are in line with a significant increase in fluid extravasation when compared with the P-group. The clinically significant increase in TTW in skeletal muscle and skin is interesting because the TTW increase in these major organ systems is pointing on the magnitude of fluid shifts during 120 min of CPB in the I-group. Both study groups had higher tissue water content than the historic controls, probably due to various factors such as anesthesia, surgery, and CPB.
Lung function has been demonstrated to be negatively affected by volatile anesthetics. Destabilization of surfactant,21 alveolar epithelial injury,12 and effects on fluid homeostasis14,15 may play a role. Isoflurane has been found to increase the permeability of the alveolocapillary barrier.22 The mechanisms behind this phenomenon remains unclear, but could be related to isoflurane-initiated release of vascular endothelial growth factor or to synthesized nitric oxide contributing to vasodilatation and an increase in vascular permeability.23
As demonstrated in this study, an increase in vascular permeability seems not to be limited to the pulmonary vasculature alone, but to affect capillaries in other organs of the body as well. With sevoflurane, such effects have been claimed to be absent.22
In the current study, a trend to higher TTW of the lungs were observed in the I-group as compared with the P-group with a numeric difference of 25%. The lack of significant differences may be explained by ongoing contractions of the right ventricle during bypass, leading to various degrees of perfusion/hypoperfusion in the pulmonary vessels during CPB resulting in lowered and variable capillary hydrostatic pressure and corresponding variation in basic FER.
Vascular fluid shifts are well described by the Starling equation focusing on the physiological mechanisms involved in fluid transfer between the vascular and the extravascular compartments: Jv = CFC·(Pc − Pi) − σ·(COPp − COPi).24 Fluid filtration (Jv) depends on the capillary filtration coefficient (CFC) which is proportional to hydraulic conductivity and capillary area accessible for fluid transfer. Pc and Pi describe the capillary hydrostatic pressure (c) and the interstitial fluid hydrostatic pressure (i). COPp and COPi describe the COPs of the respective compartments. The capillary hydrostatic pressure (Pc) decreases in humans from a level of approximately 32–36 mmHg at the arterial end to levels of 12–25 mmHg at the venous end of the capillaries, and the Pc is generally lower in the lungs and in hepatic sinusoids.24
Similar conditions are assumed to exist in pigs. Pc is partly influenced by the sympathetic tone reflected by systemic vascular resistance. In the current study, systemic vascular resistance of the I-group tended to be below the values of the P-group before and partly during CPB, suggesting lower degree of precapillary resistance and higher Pc values in the I-group, which may have contributed to an increase in FER.
Pc is, however, also strongly influenced by the venous pressure (Pv) according to the equation: Pc = Pv + F•Rv where F is blood flow and Rv is venous resistance.25 In fact Pc is four times more sensitive to the venous pressure than to the arterial pressure.24 In the current study, there was a slight nonsignificant trend to higher CVP values in the I-group that additionally may have contributed to an increase in Pc with an increase in FER.
The presence of an isoflurane-related increase in TTW content in capsulated organs such as liver and kidneys is peculiar. In the liver, nearly three quarters of the hepatic blood flow occurs at near venous pressure with values approximately 6 mmHg in the hepatic sinuoides.24 The trend to higher CVP values of the I-group compared with the P-group may have affected both hepatic blood flow and the capillary hydrostatic filtration pressure and may thereby have contributed to the increased TTW levels of the liver during isoflurane anesthesia. Similar conditions could also be present in the kidneys and thereby have contributed to an increase in TTW in these organs as well.
The clinical relevance of these results are emphasized by reports in the literature of an association between perioperative fluid overloading and postoperative adverse outcome seen in cardiac,2,3 abdominal,26,27 and pulmonary surgery.28 Significant perioperative fluid accumulation with formation of tissue edema may contribute to postoperative organ dysfunction, whereas fluid restriction seems to be associated with better organ performance as recently demonstrated by Kvalheim et al.29 concerning heart and lung function.
The blood–brain barrier may also be affected by anesthesia with isoflurane. Tétrault et al.13 reported breakdown of the blood–brain barrier in cortex and thalamus after 3% isoflurane anesthesia, whereas 1% isoflurane only resulted in an opening of the blood–brain barrier in thalamus with an increase in cerebral volume. The current experiments were performed with isoflurane concentrations commonly at a level of 0.5–1.5% given before and during CPB. The study was not designed to evaluate the patency of the blood–brain barrier in the research animals, and no differences in TTW of the brains were seen. However, brain tissue was only sampled from the cortex. In future studies, the water content of the central brain, such as the thalamus, should be included.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Limitations of the Study
Our study may have several important limitations. First of all, the number of animals included in each study group is small. FER and COPi are the main variables in the current study. From a number of previous experimental studies with similar size, post hoc power analyses with focus on FER and COPi have demonstrated a power of the results in the order of 90–95%.1,30,31 Based on these results and partly related ethical considerations concerning the use of animals in experimental laboratory research, the number of seven animals per study group was chosen. A post hoc power analysis of the results of the above-mentioned parameters in the current study confirmed a power more than 90% for FER and COPi.
According to the study protocol, anesthesia was induced in both study groups by administration of isoflurane before venous access was established. Theoretically, the results could have been influenced by the fact that isoflurane may cause a prolonged increase in alveolar epithelial permeability.32 However, this bias would only contribute to diminish the difference between the groups with respect to FER and TTW.
The intravenous anesthetic agent, propofol, is well known to produce marked vasodilatation in vivo related to its nitric oxide–releasing properties. In a previous study on systemic hemodynamic response, similar changes were seen after induction of anesthesia with isoflurane and propofol, intubation, skin incision, and sternotomy.33 The exception was a more pronounced decrease in systemic vascular resistances after propofol administration. The current study revealed a different pattern with trend to lower mean arterial pressure levels in the I-group throughout the experiment. This may represent a limitation to the current study because it could be due to differences in hemodynamic response between human and pigs or to the use of nonequivalent doses of propofol between these studies.
To conclude: isoflurane in contrast to propofol anesthesia during CPB is associated with an increase in the extravasation of fluid from the intravascular to the interstitial space resulting in dilution of interstitial fluid and a decrease in interstitial COP. The resulting formation of tissue/organ edema may negatively affect vital organ functions. Implications of these findings have to be more extensively evaluated in experimental models and in a clinical setting.
The Board of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, has authorized the “Locus for Circulatory Research” as an officially recognized research group within the faculty. The authors greatly thank this support. The technical assistance by the staff at the Laboratory for Surgical Research, University of Bergen, is greatly appreciated.
Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Farstad M, Heltne JK, Rynning SE, Lund T, Mongstad A, Eliassen F, Husby P. Fluid extravasation during cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets—Effects of hypothermia and different cooling protocols. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47:397–06

2. Toraman F, Evrenkaya S, Yuce M, Turek O, Aksoy N, Karabulut H, Demirhisar O, Alhan C. Highly positive intraoperative fluid balance during cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcome. Perfusion. 2004;19:85–1

3. Morin JF, Mistry B, Langlois Y, Ma F, Chamoun P, Holcroft C. Fluid overload after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery increases the incidence of postoperative complications. WJCS. 2011;1:18–3

4. Farstad M, Haugen O, Rynning SE, Onarheim H, Husby P. Fluid shift is moderate and short-lived during acute crystalloid hemodilution and normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:949–55

5. Paparella D, Yau TM, Young E. Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: Pathophysiology and treatment. An update. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:232–44

6. Kvalheim V, Farstad M, Haugen O, Brekke H, Mongstad A, Nygreen E, Husby P. A hyperosmolar-colloidal additive to the CPB-priming solution reduces fluid load and fluid extravasation during tepid CPB. Perfusion. 2008;23:57–3

7. Haugen O, Farstad M, Kvalheim V, Bøe O, Husby P. Elevated flow rate during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with fluid accumulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:587–93

8. Hauge A, Nicolaysen G. The importance of flow pulsatility for the rate of transvascular fluid filtration in lungs. J Physiol. 1979;290:569–76

9. Connolly CM, Kramer GC, Hahn RG, Chaisson NF, Svensén CH, Kirschner RA, Hastings DA, Chinkes DL, Prough DS. Isoflurane but not mechanical ventilation promotes extravascular fluid accumulation during crystalloid volume loading. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:670–81

10. Norberg A, Hahn RG, Li H, Olsson J, Prough DS, Børsheim E, Wolf S, Minton RK, Svensén CH. Population volume kinetics predicts retention of 0.9% saline infused in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:24–32

11. Hu G, Schwartz DE, Shajahan AN, Visintine DJ, Salem MR, Crystal GJ, Albrecht RF, Vogel SM, Minshall RD. Isoflurane, but not sevoflurane, increases transendothelial albumin permeability in the isolated rat lung: Role for enhanced phosphorylation of caveolin-1. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:777–85

12. ChangLai SP, Hung WT, Liao KK. Detecting alveolar epithelial injury following volatile anesthetics by (99m)Tc DTPA radioaerosol inhalation lung scan. Respiration. 1999;66:506–10

13. Tétrault S, Chever O, Sik A, Amzica F. Opening of the blood-brain barrier during isoflurane anaesthesia. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:1330–41

14. Weiss YG, Merin G, Koganov E, Ribo A, Oppenheim-Eden A, Medalion B, Peruanski M, Reider E, Bar-Ziv J, Hanson WC, Pizov R. Postcardiopulmonary bypass hypoxemia: A prospective study on incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000;14:506–13

15. Weiss YG, Pizov R. Isoflurane promotes extravascular fluid accumulation in humans. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1242–3

16. Chu CH, David Liu D, Hsu YH, Lee KC, Chen HI. Propofol exerts protective effects on the acute lung injury induced by endotoxin in rats. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2007;20:503–12

17. Husby P, Heltne JK, Koller ME, Birkeland S, Westby J, Fosse R, Lund T. Midazolam-fentanyl-isoflurane anaesthesia is suitable for haemodynamic and fluid balance studies in pigs. Lab Anim. 1998;32:316–23

18. Heltne JK, Husby P, Koller ME, Lund T. Sampling of interstitial fluid and measurement of colloid osmotic pressure (COPi) in pigs: Evaluation of the wick method. Lab Anim. 1998;32:439–45

19. Brekke HK, Oveland E, Kolmannskog O, Hammersborg SM, Wiig H, Husby P, Tenstad O, Nedrebø T. Isolation of interstitial fluid in skin during volume expansion: Evaluation of a method in pigs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H1546–53

20. Heltne JK, Farstad M, Lund T, Koller ME, Matre K, Rynning SE, Husby P. Determination of plasma volume in anaesthetized piglets using the carbon monoxide (CO) method. Lab Anim. 2002;36:344–50

21. Gunaydin B, Karadenizli Y, Babacan A, Kaya K, Unlu M, Inanir S, Mahli A, Akcabay M, Yardim S. Pulmonary microvascular injury following general anaesthesia with volatile anaesthetics halothane and isoflurane: A comparative clinical and experimental study. Respir Med. 1997;91:351–60

22. Kandatsu N, Nan YS, Feng GG, Nishiwaki K, Hirokawa M, Ishikawa K, Komatsu T, Yokochi T, Shimada Y, Ishikawa N. Opposing effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on neurogenic pulmonary edema development in an animal model. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1182–9

23. Murohara T, Horowitz JR, Silver M, Tsurumi Y, Chen D, Sullivan A, Isner JM. Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor enhances vascular permeability via nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Circulation. 1998;97:99–107

24. Levick JR An Introduction to Cardiovascular Physiology. 20034th edition New York Oxford University Press:170–98

25. Zhang JX, Wolf MB. Effects of cold on microvascular fluid movement in the cat limb. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71:703–8

26. Tambyraja AL, Sengupta F, MacGregor AB, Bartolo DC, Fearon KC. Patterns and clinical outcomes associated with routine intravenous sodium and fluid administration after colorectal resection. World J Surg. 2004;28:1046–51

27. Itobi E, Stroud M, Elia M. Impact of oedema on recovery after major abdominal surgery and potential value of multifrequency bioimpedance measurements. Br J Surg. 2006;93:354–61

28. Møller AM, Pedersen T, Svendsen PE, Engquist A. Perioperative risk factors in elective pneumonectomy: The impact of excess fluid balance. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19:57–2

29. Kvalheim VL, Farstad M, Steien E, Mongstad A, Borge BA, Kvitting PM, Husby P. Infusion of hypertonic saline/starch during cardiopulmonary bypass reduces fluid overload and may impact cardiac function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:485–93

30. Heltne JK, Koller ME, Lund T, Farstad M, Rynning SE, Bert JL, Husby P. Studies on fluid extravasation related to induced hypothermia during cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:720–8

31. Farstad M, Heltne JK, Rynning SE, Onarheim H, Mongstad A, Eliassen F, Husby P. Can the use of methylprednisolone, vitamin C, or alpha-trinositol prevent cold-induced fluid extravasation during cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:525–34

32. Sun SS, Hsieh JF, Tsai SC, Ho YJ, Kao CH. Transient increase in alveolar epithelial permeability induced by volatile anesthesia with isoflurane. Lung. 2000;178:129–35

33. Pagnin A, Ceriana P, Maurelli M, Locatelli A, Bertollo D, Mazza MP, Chiaudani G, Bianchi T. [Comparison between propofol and isoflurane in patients undergoing aorto-coronary bypass. Effect on systemic and coronary circulation]. Minerva Anestesiol. 1992;58:361–7

© 2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.

Article Tools