Education: Clinical Concepts and Commentary
Perioperative Management of Coagulation in Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Degos, Vincent M.D., Ph.D.*; Westbroek, Erick M. B.S.†; Lawton, Michael T. M.D.‡; Hemphill, J. Claude III M.D.§; del Zoppo, Gregory J. M.D.‖; Young, William L. M.D.#
APPROXIMATELY 70,000 new cases of spontaneous, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occur annually in the United States.1
ICH is a significant cause of mortality throughout the Western world, with an estimated 30-day fatality rate of 30–50%. Surgical treatment is indicated for patients meeting specific criteria,2
and coagulation management is a crucial aspect of perioperative strategy.
Antithrombotic therapies are split into three categories such as antiplatelet agents (e.g.
, aspirin, clopidogrel), anticoagulant agents (e.g.
, warfarin, heparins), and fibrinolytic agents (e.g.
, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator). ICH can occur in the absence or the presence of any antithrombotic treatments. All antithrombotic agents have been associated with an increased risk of ICH in specific settings. Even though antiplatelet agents are the most commonly prescribed agents in the population, oral vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) are a predominant cause of antithrombotic-associated ICH. With the increased use of antithrombotic therapies, the incidence of antithrombotic-associated ICH appears to be increasing.3
Moreover, the use of new antithrombotic agents, such as the direct thrombin inhibitors and the oral factor Xa antagonists, is increasing.4
Specific strategies are recommended to reverse most antithrombotic treatments in the context of ICH.2
Disagreements regarding the use of these reversal strategies will be discussed in this article. Intracranial hemorrhage, in the presence of underlying antithrombotic treatment, is thought to have a worse prognosis due to prolonged bleeding.6
Thus, anticoagulation reversal may provide a therapeutic opportunity. Although evidence for anticoagulation reversal directly impacting outcomes is scarce,7
this approach, a common element of care in neurological intensive care units, is known to have improved outcomes and is a part of the current ICH guidelines from the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association with a Class I (level of evidence C).2
Even without any antithrombotic agent, it is now clearly established that intracerebral hematoma volume frequently increases during the initial phase of bleeding, contributing to neurological deterioration.9
The ICH Score identifies independent risk factors for poor neurological outcome,10
including hematoma volume. Consequently, there has been interest in the use of hemostatic agents to potentially limit hematoma expansion.
The high prevalence of antithrombotic-associated ICH and the potentially protective strategy for improving hemostasis in ICH highlight the pivotal role of coagulation in perioperative management. The critical nature of this disease demands complex management and close collaboration among intensivists, hematologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and anesthesiologists. In this nonsystematic review article, we will summarize and clarify therapeutic recommendations for intracranial hemorrhage in the presence or absence of antithrombotic treatments, and highlight the debate about new therapeutic strategies in perioperative coagulation management in ICH.
Unique Considerations in Intracranial Bleeding
Because of the distinct architecture and physiology of the brain and cranium, the consequences of intracranial hemorrhage are unique in many ways. Pressure exerted by the hematoma can inflict rapid and direct mechanical injury to the parenchyma. The rigidity of the cranial vault makes a noncompliant receptacle of hemorrhaged blood, meaning that even a small bleed can rapidly increase intracranial pressure. Herniation of brain tissue, past the free edges of the dural reflections or through the foramen magnum, is a feared complication of increased intracranial pressure. Local neuronal death and ischemia cause the release of additional excitotoxic and inflammatory mediators, thus causing decreased blood flow and further neuronal death. In addition, coagulation factors and other constituents of plasma, which are activated by contact with the neuropil (e.g., tissue factor [TF]), can cause cell injury and demise. This indirect form of injury may explain why surgical hematoma evacuation is insufficient to prevent major neurological damage.
The ICH Score is commonly used to stratify patients regarding the risk of early mortality and long-term functional outcome in ICH.10
Specific factors are present across studies, including the larger hematoma volume (estimated from measurements on an axial imaging scan and the formula for an ellipsoid: length × width × height/2), the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, impaired consciousness, and increased age.
It is now clearly established that hematoma volume is often unstable during the early phases of bleeding and may continue to increase within hours after the initial hemorrhage, even in the absence of antithrombotic treatments. Within 3 h of symptom onset, approximately 38% of patients experienced volume increases of more than 33%.11
Hematoma volume is generally stable after the first 24 h. Underlying mechanisms explaining the early increase in hematoma size are not clearly established, but local and systemic factors involved in the coagulation are possibly involved. Although closed cranial head trauma can initiate systemic coagulopathy (i.e.
, disseminated intravascular coagulation), which depends on the severity of the cortical injury, there is little evidence that disseminated intravascular coagulation is initiated by brain hemorrhage. In the context of surgery, it is postulated that local and systemic coagulation pathways are activated. TF is the primary physiological initiator of the coagulation cascade.12
The cerebral cortex is the major source of TF, which is found in microvessel-rich beds, with less TF abundance in white matter in part due to the lower vascular density.14
Phospholipids contribute to normal hemostasis via
several mechanisms. Anionic phospholipid moieties can activate TF and facilitate the generation of thrombin. Although the phospholipid environment affects TF activity,14
platelet activating factor stimulates platelet degranulation and aggregation, and sphingolipids can promote cerebral vasospasm in animal models.15
Acute brain injury is also known to alter the concentrations of these active phospholipids.17
Moreover, tissue hypoperfusion and activation of the protein C pathway have been implicated in the early coagulation modulation seen in brain injuries.19
Increased inflammation is also thought to lead to up-regulation of TF in circulating cells of the monocyte or macrophage lineage. These inflammation-related coagulation processes may affect the brain more globally, as imaging studies have shown evidence of diffuse blood–brain barrier breakdown.20
Attention has turned to the possibility of continued arterial bleeding as a potential cause of hematoma expansion. The administration of intravenous contrast during an initial computed tomography scan may identify contrast extravasation.21
The presence of this extravasation, called the “spot sign,” correlates with the likelihood of hematoma expansion.
Antithrombotic Therapies in the Context ofICH
The first responses to vascular injury are contraction of the smooth muscular components of the vessel wall and platelet adhesion to the vessel wall. Hence, strategies that inhibit platelet activation, adhesion, and aggregation are expected to limit vascular occlusion. Aspirin, the most commonly used antiplatelet agent, irreversibly acetylates platelet cyclooxygenase-1 and inhibits thromboxane release, preventing platelet activation (fig. 1
). Low-dose aspirin is commonly prescribed to prevent ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction. However, despite the good risk-to-benefit ratio, aspirin alone increases the risk of ICH.23
Combining aspirin with other antithrombotic agents seems to amplify the risk of ICH.24
The active metabolites of the thienopyridines (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel), products of cytochrome P450 metabolism, covalently and irreversibly bind to the P2
receptor for the entire lifespan of the platelet. Newer direct-acting P2
inhibitors (cangrelor and ticagrelor) change the conformation of the P2
receptor. This results in reversible inhibition. All P2
receptor inhibitors block adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation (fig. 1
) and thus increase ICH risk.17
Platelet activation leads to a conformational change in their glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors. This change promotes the binding to fibrinogen and platelet aggregation. glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, such as abciximab, prevent binding of fibrinogen and platelet aggregation (fig. 1
), thus increasing the risk of ICH.25
An initiating event for the coagulation cascade is the exposure of TF from the microvessel-rich beds of the neuropil leading to formation of the TF:VIIa complex with activated factor VII. This “extrinsic” interaction promotes the initiation, amplification, and propagation phases of coagulation.12
The coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X require a γ-carboxylation step in the liver for biological activity; this process is dependent on the reduced form of vitamin K. VKAs inhibit the enzyme vitamin K epoxide reductase, blocking the formation of reduced vitamin K. VKAs lead to the production of coagulation factors with reduced activity (fig. 1
The response to VKAs is influenced by several factors, including metabolism-altering polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 system (e.g.
, sequence variants in CYP2C9 and Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1), other drugs, diet, and other disease states.26
VKAs are the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulants, currently with approximately 3 million patients in the United States.26
Aging populations display an increased prevalence of patients treated with VKAs. Unfortunately, this has also led to an increase in the hemorrhagic complications of these agents.3
ICH is one of the most serious complications of oral anticoagulation, corresponding to 10% of bleeding complications of these drugs and virtually all fatal complications. The excess mortality generated by taking VKAs is strongly dose-dependent.
Unfractionated heparins (UFHs) and low-molecular-weight heparins are commonly used to prevent deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli. Heparin binding accelerates the effects of the inhibitor antithrombin. The heparin:antithrombin complex inactivates thrombin (IIa) and other proteases involved in blood clotting, most notably factor Xa, but also IXa, XIa, and XIIa. Because of their size, low-molecular-weight heparins have lower antifactor IIa activity than UFH and are anticoagulant through antifactor Xa activity, whereas UFHs act on both targets and other sites. With extensive perioperative use of low-molecular-weight heparins in neurosurgery, rare cases of ICH have been reported.27
Direct thrombin inhibitors interact directly with the thrombin molecule and bivalent direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g
., bivalirudin or hirulog) bind to the active site and exosite 1, whereas the univalent direct thrombin inhibitors (argatroban, melagatran, and dabigatran) bind only to the active site. Dabigatran has the advantage of being an oral prodrug, which makes it convenient to use. New factor Xa antagonists (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and endoxaban) have also the advantage of being an oral formulation. Even if the risk of antithrombotic-associated ICH seems to be lower with these agents,28
have been associated with increased risk of hemorrhage. Unlike VKAs, however, there are yet no recognized reversal strategies.31
Fibrinolysis is the enzymatic process leading to solubilization of fibrin clot by plasmin. Plasmin is generated from its zymogen, plasminogen, through the action of a plasminogen activator. One naturally occurring plasminogen activator, tissue-type-plasminogen activator (tissue plasminogen activator), is synthesized by endothelial cells and secreted locally after stimulation of the endothelium. Tissue plasminogen activator is co-secreted with its principal inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator can also decrease in vitro
fibrinogen concentrations. It is licensed for use in the context of acute ischemic stroke and myocardial infarct. Its most feared complication is parenchymal hemorrhage. The incidence of symptomatic ICH, in the context of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment for acute ischemic stroke, varies from 6 to 11 versus
0.6 to 3% in the placebo group in one study.32
Secondary analysis of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator trials has identified extended hypodensity on initial computed tomography scan as a risk factor for severe hemorrhagic transformation.33
Furthermore, combination of heparin and fibrinolytic agent increases the risk of hemorrhage in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke.34
ICH is a serious, but rare, complication of intravenous thrombolysis combined with heparin after myocardial infarction. The incidence of ICH after myocardial infarction is estimated to be between 0.4 and 1.3% after administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, with two-thirds of cases occurring within the first 6 h after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator delivery.
General Recommendations for Treatment of ICH
The decision to surgically evacuate ICH is controversial. Clinical trials examining this question have often been underpowered. The surgical treatment of ICH trial has recently influenced the American Heart Association guidelines for the surgical management of ICH.2
The American Heart Association currently suggests that patients with cerebellar hemorrhage, who are deteriorating neurologically or who have brainstem compression and/or hydrocephalus from ventricular obstruction, should undergo surgical removal of the hemorrhage as soon as possible (Class I). These patients should not be treated by ventricular drain alone (Class III). For patients presenting with lobar hemorrhages of more than 30 ml and within 1 cm of the surface, evacuation of the supratentorial ICH by standard craniotomy may be considered (Class IIb). Importantly, at present, no clear evidence indicates that ultra-early removal of supratentorial ICH improves functional outcome or mortality rate. Very early craniotomy may be harmful due to the increased risk of recurrent bleeding (Class III). Although theoretically attractive, minimally invasive endoscopic coagulum evacuation awaits further trials, and its utility is still unknown (Class IIb).
The American Heart Association guidelines recommend rapid computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes (Class I). Patients should be managed in an intensive care setting, preferably a neurological intensive care unit (Class I). Normoglycemia (Class I), blood pressure (Class I), and seizure control (Class I) should be maintained. Patients with cerebellar hemorrhage and neurological deterioration, or who have brain stem compression and/or hydrocephalus from ventricular obstruction, should immediately undergo surgical coagulum removal (Class I). Intermittent pneumatic compression stockings should be applied to prevent venous thromboembolism (Class I).
When intracranial hemorrhage occurs in the absence of antithrombotic therapy, the objective is to bring the patient to surgery with normal ranges of fibrinogen, coagulation factors, and platelets. Factor-replacement therapy or platelet transfusions are currently recommended only for patients with severe coagulation factor deficiency or thrombocytopenia, respectively (Class I). In this setting, although activated recombinant FVII (rFVIIa) has been shown to reduce hematoma expansion (80 μg/kg within 4 h after the onset of the ICH) in patients without antithrombotic therapy,35
it did not improve patient outcomes and was associated with increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events in unselected patients.36
rFVIIa is, therefore, not recommended for this indication (Class III; for further details about the pharmacologic prevention of hematoma expansion, see below).
Specific Recommendations for Management of Bleeding in the Setting of Antithrombotic Therapies
The American Heart Association recommendations for coagulation management in ICH in the setting of antithrombotic therapies provide no explicit instruction for perioperative care. It is crucial, for perioperative management and preparation of patients for surgery, to have guidelines for their management. The goal of treatment is the specific reversal of the effects of particular antithrombotic agent to restore efficient hemostasis before any surgery (table 1
). In this context, reversal of antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic agents will be presented. The recommendations regarding the management of antithrombotic-associated ICH are summarized in figure 2
Although no strict guidelines exist for antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, platelet transfusion before surgical hematoma evacuation for patients taking antiplatelet drugs is proposed. For patients undergoing antiplatelet treatment, platelet transfusions are still considered investigational (Class IIb).
The antiplatelet agent presugrel, a thienopyridine adenosine diphosphate-receptor inhibitor, and the adenosine-like molecule ticagrelor have been developed for the management of acute coronary syndrome and for use with stents. Their potency and risk of ICH have not been fully assessed, and there are as yet no guidelines for their management in thissetting.
ICH guidelines from different countries for patients taking VKAs are summarized in table 2
. The consensus for managing ICH patients on VKAs is that the anticoagulant should be withheld, vitamin K delivered intravenously, vitamin K–dependent factors replaced, and the International Normalized Ratio corrected (Class I). With regard to vitamin K–dependent factor replacement, the guidelines vary by country. European guidelines advocate the use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) for factor replacement. The current American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guidelines state that PCCs have not been shown to improve outcome compared with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), but are reasonable to consider because they may have fewer complications (Class IIa), primarily related to a lower volume of delivery.2
rFVIIa acutely normalizes prothrombin time, but its effect lasts only a few hours. In addition, it does not replace all clotting factors. It can thus lower the International Normalized Ratio without restoring coagulation ability in vivo
(Class III). Therefore, it is not recommended as the sole agent for VKA reversal in ICH management.
For patients receiving UFH with an activated partial thromboplastin time of more than two times longer than reference, the American Heart Association recommends slow intravenous infusion of protamine sulfate (Class I). The recommended dose must be adjusted for UFH load and elapsed time since the last heparin dose.5
In the case of low-molecular-weight heparins, full reversal with protamine sulfate is not possible. Protamine sulfate will inhibit only 50% of the anti-Xa activity, and may need to be redelivered.
New Oral Anticoagulants.
The new oral anticoagulants, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been associated with a risk of hemorrhage.31
There is no dedicated standard for these agents in the context of surgical ICH as yet. Unlike VKAs, there are no recognized reversal strategies available. Specific pharmacological reversal strategies for dabigatran and rivaroxaban are currently in progress and are likely to develop for apixaban. Because half-lives of these drugs are short (table 1
), delays between the last intake and the hemorrhage will help to determine the reversal needs. Evaluation of the coagulation status with blood test (activated partial thromboplastin time and blood anticoagulant direct or indirect concentrations measures) should also be part of the therapeutic strategy before introducing reversal therapies.37
In the case of dabigatran, oral activated charcoal should be used if the agent was ingested less than 2 h before presentation. Because of its renal clearance, dabigatran can be removed by hemodialysis. The use of oral activated charcoal is also suggested for rivaroxaban.31
Animal studies suggest that factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity (table 3
) and rFVIIa present in vitro
reversal effects, but further studies are needed before any recommendations can be made.31
Fibrinogen levels can be depleted in patients who have received a plasminogen activator. To manage this situation, replacement of fibrinogen, coagulation factors, and platelets (Class IIb) has been proposed. Plasminogen activator inhibitors (ε-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid) have not been shown to be effective in reducing hematoma expansion or improving survival, but have potentially harmful effects.38
Well-controlled randomized trials, however, are lacking. Further studies are needed for firm recommendations.
Current Debates Regarding Coagulation Treatment in ICH Management
Surgical Treatment of Intracranial Bleeding in the Presence of Antithrombotic Therapies: Indications for Surgery and Preoperative Coagulation Requirements
Indications for evacuating an intracerebral hematoma are controversial.2
Intraparenchymal hemorrhage is a destructive event that injures brain tissue directly and by compression. Hematoma evacuation is intended to alleviate secondary effects such as mass effect and edema. Therefore, the neurosurgeon must evaluate whether the neurological deficits and overall condition of the patient are due to primary tissue damage or secondary effects of the hematoma. In cases with underlying lesions such as aneurysms or arteriovenous malformations, surgery treats the cause of the hemorrhage while also evacuating the hematoma. Surgery can do nothing to address the devastating effects of primary tissue damage from the mechanical injury to the parenchyma.
Anticoagulation is an important consideration in the surgical care of patients with ICH. If surgery is indicated, patients must be corrected before proceeding to the operating room with International Normalized Ratio less than 1.5, platelet counts preferably greater than 100 K, and an activated partial thromboplastin time in the normal range. A hematoma that is evacuated in an uncorrected patient will likely recur, eliminating the benefits of surgery. Therefore, reversal of anticoagulation must be managed immediately, swiftly, and completely (fig. 2
Intracranial Bleeding in the Presence of VKAs: FFP or PCCas Adjunct to Intravenous Vitamin K?
Despite the preference given to PCCs and FFP over rFVIIa in most guidelines, implementation of this treatment option has been less uniform in Western countries. For example, in a survey of North American physicians, only 10% chose to treat intracranial bleeding in the presence of antithrombotic therapies with PCCs, and 70% chose to treat with rFVIIa.40
Differences in prescriptions are in part due to local availability, expense, and unproven efficacy.
Most guidelines recommend PCCs over FFP as an adjunct to intravenous vitamin K (table 1
). The disadvantages of FFP transfusion compared with PCC injection are manifold and include: (1) the time needed for ABO blood-typing, thawing large volumes of FFP, and transfusion time; (2) delayed onset of the therapeutic effect; (3) potential circulatory overload from large transfusion volumes, especially in patients with cardiac disease; (4) possible allergic reactions; (5) risk of infection from exposure to multiple donors; and (6) the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury. Delays in effect are likely detrimental to the acute disease.
In contrast, PCCs are reconstituted within minutes in a small volume (20–40 ml/dose) and can be infused rapidly (10 ml/min) for partial or complete replacement of vitamin K coagulation factors. Importantly, there is minimal risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury. PCCs also carry a negligible risk for viral transmission. For all these reasons, PCCs are potentially superior to FFP for urgent reversal of the VKA effect. One notable issue, however, is that PCCs often contain low doses of heparin, so patients can theoretically be subject to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
PCCs were first designed for hemophilic patients with high concentrations of factor VIII and IX inhibitors. Their indication was extended to patients taking VKAs who were in need of replacement of factors II, VII, IX, and X. Although the argument and evidence for the adoption of PCC treatment as standard practice are compelling, they are not unanimously supported. Intriguingly, other studies were unable to prove the superiority of PCCs41
in the context of VKA-associated intracranial bleeding. This lack of consensus, compared with PCC use in hemorrhage elsewhere in the body, could be due to the immediate functional impairments caused by central nervous system bleeding, or could simply be a result of small sample size and heterogeneity in research methods and clinical practice. Furthermore, although both American and European guidelines are supportive of PCCs, marked geographical differences exist in PCC composition and usage.
The clear discrepancy between guidelines and practice in North America could be due to three factors. First, comprehensive recommendations for the management of stroke came recently and may not have been well distributed among American physicians. Second, current American guidelines may not accurately reflect the reality of treatment options available in the United States. Third, there are strikingly different FVII concentrations among PCCs distributed in Europe compared with the United States.42
Before April 2013, PCCs available in the United States (table 3
) contain low amounts of FVII relative to FII, FIX, and FX levels and are thus called “3-factor PCCs.” PCCs available in countries outside the United States are called “4-factor PCCs” because they contain relatively the same amounts of FII, FVII, FIX, and FX. This difference in factor ratio motivated a recent American study that supplemented an available 3-PCC (Profilnine-SD; Grifols, Los Angeles, CA) with rFVIIa.42
In other American institutions, local guidance proposed to add FFP to 3-PCC treatments. Moreover, a four-component PCC has very recently been approved for warfarin reversal by the American Food and Drug Administration (tables 2
). If the importance of FVII can be demonstrated in a randomized trial, then these behavioral discrepancies will likely disappear.
Intracranial Bleeding in the Absence of Antithrombotic Therapies: Treatments to Prevent Hematoma Extension
One-third of ICH patients present with expanding hematomas. Because hematoma volume is a major risk factor for poor outcome, the hypothesis naturally developed that decreasing hematoma expansion with procoagulant treatments could improve patient outcomes. The potential benefits of procoagulant treatments are balanced with the thrombosis risks of these treatments.
Using rFVIIa, a prospective, randomized trial tested the hypothesis that the administration of rFVIIa could limit the extent of cerebral hemorrhage in patients not receiving anticoagulant therapy.35
The administration of rFVIIa halved this increase in volume compared with placebo (29% of volume increase for placebo versus
14% for the group treated with 80 μg/kg of rFVIIa). A subsequent larger phase III trial failed to show any effect of rFVIIa on mortality or functional outcomes, whereas demonstrating an association between rFVIIa use and arterial thrombosis.36
Continuing this paradigm, Levi et al.36
recently pooled 35 studies in a safety analysis and showed that treatment with high doses of rFVIIa on an off-label basis (31% of the recruited patients had ICH) increased the risk of arterial thromboembolic events, especially among the elder patients. Even if a subgroup of patients with less risk of thrombosis could be a target population for treatment designed to reduce hematoma expansion,43
independent replications are required before rFVIIa can be recommended for this indication.
Other agents to prevent hematoma expansion have been proposed. For example, antifibrinolytic agents, such as tranexamic acid, have already been demonstrated to reduce the hematoma size in traumatic ICH and could be of interest in this indication.44
However, their contraindication in the setting of disseminated intravascular coagulation limits the interest of the antifibrinolytic agents for patients with ICH.
Finally, the possibility of treating patients who have intracranial hemorrhage in the absence of antithrombotic therapies, and who have a spot sign21
with hemostatic agents, is enticing, but unstudied.
ICH is a disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. The literature demonstrates that anticoagulant agents and perioperative coagulation management strategies have a profound impact on outcomes. The use of powerful new anticoagulant agents is increasing. Increased understanding and knowledge of the mechanisms of each anticoagulant agent are necessary to adapt perioperative therapeutic strategies. Although treatment strategies would ideally be evidence-based, the increase in the use of new anticoagulant agents, local availability, and expense explain why, in normal practice, not all guidelines are completely adhered to. Further complicating the matter are the differences in therapeutic tools in various countries. Many important questions in the field are still unanswered and require further scrutiny and investigation.
The authors thank Meyer Michel Samama, M.D., Pharm.D. (Professor, Cochin-Broca-Hôtel Dieu University Hospital, Paris, France), for his invaluable contribution. The authors thank the Center for Cerebrovascular Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, and gratefully acknowledge the support of Société Française d’Anesthésie Réanimation, Paris, France, and Fondation des Gueules Cassées, Paris, France.
1. Flaherty ML. Anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Semin Neurol. 2010;30:565–72
2. Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC III, Anderson C, Becker K, Broderick JP, Connolly ES Jr, Greenberg SM, Huang JN, MacDonald RL, Messé SR, Mitchell PH, Selim M, Tamargo RJAmerican Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. . Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:2108–29
3. Flaherty ML, Kissela B, Woo D, Kleindorfer D, Alwell K, Sekar P, Moomaw CJ, Haverbusch M, Broderick JP. The increasing incidence of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2007;68:116–21
4. Weitz JI, Eikelboom JW, Samama MMAmerican College of Chest Physicians. . New antithrombotic drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 suppl):e120S–51S
5. Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, Hanley D, Kase C, Krieger D, Mayberg M, Morgenstern L, Ogilvy CS, Vespa P, Zuccarello MAmerican Heart Association; American Stroke Association Stroke Council; High Blood Pressure Research Council; Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. . Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Stroke. 2007;38:2001–23
6. Rosand J, Eckman MH, Knudsen KA, Singer DE, Greenberg SM. The effect of warfarin and intensity of anticoagulation on outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:880–4
7. Brouwers HB, Goldstein JN. Therapeutic strategies in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurotherapeutics. 2012;9:87–98
8. Huhtakangas J, Tetri S, Juvela S, Saloheimo P, Bode MK, Karttunen V, Karajamaki A, Hillbom M. Improved survival of patients with warfarin-associated intracerebral haemorrhage: A retrospective longitudinal population-based study. Int J Stroke. 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
9. Zazulia AR, Diringer MN, Derdeyn CP, Powers WJ. Progression of mass effect after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1999;30:1167–73
10. Hemphill JC III, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:891–7
11. Brott T, Broderick J, Kothari R, Barsan W, Tomsick T, Sauerbeck L, Spilker J, Duldner J, Khoury J. Early hemorrhage growth in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1997;28:1–5
12. Adams RL, Bird RJ. Review article: Coagulation cascade and therapeutics update: Relevance to nephrology. Part 1: Overview of coagulation, thrombophilias and history of anticoagulants. Nephrology (Carlton). 2009;14:462–70
13. Roberts HR, Monroe DM, Escobar MA. Current concepts of hemostasis: Implications for therapy. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2004;100:722–30
14. del Zoppo GJ, Yu JQ, Copeland BR, Thomas WS, Schneiderman J, Morrissey JH. Tissue factor localization in non-human primate cerebral tissue. Thromb Haemost. 1992;68:642–7
15. Chen VM, Ahamed J, Versteeg HH, Berndt MC, Ruf W, Hogg PJ. Evidence for activation of tissue factor by an allosteric disulfide bond. Biochemistry. 2006;45:12020–8
16. Tosaka M, Okajima F, Hashiba Y, Saito N, Nagano T, Watanabe T, Kimura T, Sasaki T. Sphingosine 1-phosphate contracts canine basilar arteries in vitro
and in vivo
: Possible role in pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm. Stroke. 2001;32:2913–9
17. Hillered L, Valtysson J, Enblad P, Persson L. Interstitial glycerol as a marker for membrane phospholipid degradation in the acutely injured human brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64:486–91
18. Hirashima Y, Nakamura S, Endo S, Kuwayama N, Naruse Y, Takaku A. Elevation of platelet activating factor, inflammatory cytokines, and coagulation factors in the internal jugular vein of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurochem Res. 1997;22:1249–55
19. Cohen MJ, Brohi K, Ganter MT, Manley GT, Mackersie RC, Pittet JF. Early coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury: The role of hypoperfusion and the protein C pathway. J Trauma. 2007;63:1254–61 discussion 1261–2
20. Kidwell CS, Burgess R, Menon R, Warach S, Latour LL. Hyperacute injury marker (HARM) in primary hemorrhage: A distinct form of CNS barrier disruption. Neurology. 2011;77:1725–8
21. Wada R, Aviv RI, Fox AJ, Sahlas DJ, Gladstone DJ, Tomlinson G, Symons SP. CT angiography “spot sign” predicts hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38:1257–62
22. Demchuk AM, Dowlatshahi D, Rodriguez-Luna D, Molina CA, Blas YS, Dzialowski I, Kobayashi A, Boulanger JM, Lum C, Gubitz G, Padma V, Roy J, Kase CS, Kosior J, Bhatia R, Tymchuk S, Subramaniam S, Gladstone DJ, Hill MD, Aviv RIPREDICT/Sunnybrook ICH CTA Study Group. . Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): A prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:307–14
23. He J, Whelton PK, Vu B, Klag MJ. Aspirin and risk of hemorrhagic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1998;280:1930–5
24. Hart RG, Diener HC, Yang S, Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Reilly PA, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. Intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients during anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran: The RE-LY trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1511–7
25. Becker RC, Bassand JP, Budaj A, Wojdyla DM, James SK, Cornel JH, French J, Held C, Horrow J, Husted S, Lopez-Sendon J, Lassila R, Mahaffey KW, Storey RF, Harrington RA, Wallentin L. Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2933–44
26. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti GAmerican College of Chest Physicians. . Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133(6 suppl):160–98S
27. Gerlach R, Scheuer T, Beck J, Woszczyk A, Seifert V, Raabe A. Risk of postoperative hemorrhage after intracranial surgery after early nadroparin administration: Results of a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:1028–34 discussion 1034–5
28. Miller CS, Grandi SM, Shimony A, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus
warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:453–60
29. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al-Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin LARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. . Apixaban versus
warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92
30. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, Burton P, Cohen M, Cook-Bruns N, Fox KA, Goto S, Murphy SA, Plotnikov AN, Schneider D, Sun X, Verheugt FW, Gibson CMATLAS ACS 2–TIMI 51 Investigators. . Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:9–19
31. Kaatz S, Kouides PA, Garcia DA, Spyropolous AC, Crowther M, Douketis JD, Chan AK, James A, Moll S, Ortel TL, Van Cott EM, Ansell J. Guidance on the emergent reversal of oral thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(suppl 1):S141–5
32. Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Mohr A, Ringleb PA, Jansen O, Hacke W. Thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke—A review. Part I—Intravenous thrombolysis. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1812–8
33. Larrue V, von Kummer R R, Müller A, Bluhmki E. Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: A secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke. 2001;32:438–41
34. del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Rowley HA, Gent M. PROACT: A phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. PROACT Investigators. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. Stroke. 1998;29:4–11
35. Mayer SA, Brun NC, Begtrup K, Broderick J, Davis S, Diringer MN, Skolnick BE, Steiner TRecombinant Activated Factor VII Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trial Investigators. . Recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:777–85
36. Levi M, Levy JH, Andersen HF, Truloff D. Safety of recombinant activated factor VII in randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1791–800
37. Samama MM, Guinet C, Le Flem L. Do new oral anticoagulants require laboratory monitoring? The clinician point of view. Thromb Res. 2012;130(suppl 1):S88–9
38. Piriyawat P, Morgenstern LB, Yawn DH, Hall CE, Grotta JC. Treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage with epsilon-aminocaproic acid: A pilot study. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1:47–51
39. Sorimachi T, Fujii Y, Morita K, Tanaka R. Rapid administration of antifibrinolytics and strict blood pressure control for intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:837–44
40. Neal M, Crowther M, Douketis J, Verhovsek M, Stidley C, Garcia D. Reversal of vitamin K antagonist-associated coagulopathy: A survey of current practice. Thromb Res. 2008;122:864–6
41. Boulis NM, Bobek MP, Schmaier A, Hoff JT. Use of factor IX complex in warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:1113–8 discussion 1118–9
42. Sarode R, Matevosyan K, Bhagat R, Rutherford C, Madden C, Beshay JE. Rapid warfarin reversal: A 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant factor VIIa cocktail for intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:491–7
43. Mayer SA, Davis SM, Skolnick BE, Brun NC, Begtrup K, Broderick JP, Diringer MN, Steiner TFAST Trial Investigators. . Can a subset of intracerebral hemorrhage patients benefit from hemostatic therapy with recombinant activated factor VII? Stroke. 2009;40:833–40
44. . Effect of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: A nested randomised, placebo controlled trial (CRASH-2 Intracranial Bleeding Study). BMJ. 2011;343:d3795
© 2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.