Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2013 - Volume 118 - Issue 3 > Critical Role of Protease-activated Receptor 2 Activation by...
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827d415f
Pain Medicine

Critical Role of Protease-activated Receptor 2 Activation by Mast Cell Tryptase in the Development of Postoperative Pain

Oliveira, Sara M. Ph.D.*; Silva, Cássia R. M.Sc.; Ferreira, Juliano Ph.D.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box


Background: Studies have indicated that nearly half of all surgical patients still have inadequate pain relief. Thus, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms involved in postoperative pain in order to better treat it. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of mast cell degranulation, tryptase and its substrate, the protease-activated receptor 2, in a model of postoperative pain in mice.
Methods: We evaluated the effect of the compound 48/80 (to cause mast cell mediator depletion), cromoglycate or ketotifen (mast cell stabilizers), gabexate (tryptase inhibitor) or N3-methylbutyryl-N-6-aminohexanoyl-piperazine (protease-activated receptor 2 antagonist) in a postoperative pain model in mice (n = 5–10). Mast cell degranulation and tryptase activity were also evaluated in the operated tissue (n= 5–8).
Results: The pre-treatment with compound 48/80 or ketotifen was able to prevent nociception throughout the postoperative hyperalgesia course (until 5 days after surgery), whereas cromoglycate presented a shorter effect (until 1 day). Gabexate or N3-methylbutyryl-N-6-aminohexanoyl-piperazine also produced a short-lasting effect in preventing postoperative nociception. However, neither gabexate, N3-methylbutyryl-N-6-aminohexanoyl-piperazine nor cromoglycate was capable of reversing nociception when administered after incision. Surgery led to early mast cell degranulation on the incised tissue and increased tryptase activity in tissue perfusates. Cromoglycate fully prevented the tryptase release in the perfusate and the compound 48/80 substantially reduced tryptase activity in the incised tissue.
Conclusion: Thus, the mast cell degranulation with the subsequent release of tryptase and protease-activated receptor 2 activation are potential targets for the development of novel therapies to prevent, but not reverse, postoperative pain.
Back to Top | Article Outline

What We Already Know about This Topic

* When activated, mast cells release tryptase, which activates protease-activated receptor 2
* The role of protease-activated receptor 2 activation in postoperative pain has not been examined
Back to Top | Article Outline

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

* In mice, inhibition of mast cell degranulation and specific antagonism of protease-activated receptor 2 reduced hypersensitivity and guarding behavior, assumed to represent spontaneous nociception
* Targeting mast cells and protease-activated receptor 2 was only effective when given before surgery
DURING the past two decades, the under treatment of acute pain in surgical patients has been widely recognized as an important issue in health care. Patients who have well-controlled pain have an improved health-related quality of life and an overall greater satisfaction with their experience.1,2 Unfortunately, despite the introduction of new standards, guidelines, and educational efforts, data from around the world suggest that postoperative pain continues to be managed inadequately.3,4 Of note, the pursuit of postoperative analgesia is frequently complicated by the limited efficacy and undesirable side effects of the currently available analgesic drugs.5,6 Thus, studying the mechanisms involved in postoperative pain is a useful means of identifying new targets to better treat this pain.
A number of mechanisms are likely involved, including tissue injury related to the incision itself, secondary inflammation, and damage to nerves caused by tissue retraction during the surgery.7 The site of the incision has been documented to demonstrate signs of inflammation, including local edema, hyperthermia, hyperemia and pain,8,9 indicating that surgery causes the cellular and vascular release of proinflammatory substances that mediate postoperative pain.10 Mast cells have been previously shown to degranulate and its number are largely reduced following tissue incision.11 Furthermore, we previously demonstrated that the prevention of mast cell degranulation largely reduced hyperalgesia in a model of postoperative pain.12 However, the antagonism of histamine or serotonin, two important mast cell mediators, only partially reduce postoperative nociception, indicating that other mast cell components must be involved.
In addition to histamine and serotonin, mast cell degranulation releases tryptase, which has been demonstrated to be an important pronociceptive protease related to some painful diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome.13–15 Tryptase is known to be a potent activator of protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2).16,17 Tryptase works by cleaving a specific site on the extracellular N-terminal domain of the receptor and releases a new N-terminal domain for the receptor, which acts as a tethered ligand by binding to the second extracellular loop of the receptor to induce intracellular signaling.18 PAR-2 is a G protein-coupled receptor that is expressed in the peripheral terminals of sensory neurons and seems to play an important role in inflammatory pain.19–21
The close association between mast cells and nerves in peripheral tissues, and the fact that large amounts of tryptase are released upon mast cell degranulation, makes tryptase an ideal candidate to activate PAR-2 on peripheral neurons.10,22 However, the putative role of tryptase or PAR-2 is unknown in postoperative pain. Thus, in this study, we assess the ability of mast cell tryptase to mediate nociceptive responses via the PAR-2 receptor in a model of postoperative pain in mice.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

The experiments were conducted as described by Oliveira et al.12 using male Swiss mice (25–35 g) and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (process number 45/2010).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Gabexate mesylate, N-p-Tosyl-Gly-Pro-Arg p-nitroanilide acetate salt, tryptase from the human lung, compound 48/80, sodium cromoglycate, lidocaine and ketotifen fumarate were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). N3-methylbutyryl-N-6-aminohexanoyl-piperazine (ENMD-1068) was obtained from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY). Except ketotifen, which was diluted in saline, all other compounds were diluted in a phosphate-buffered saline solution (137 mM NaCl and 10 mM phosphate buffer; pH 7.4). Formaldehyde, paraffin, acetic acid, ethanol, toluidine blue, and xylol were purchased from Merck (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Postoperative Pain Model
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane via a nose cone, and after antiseptic preparation of the right hind paw, a longitudinal incision was made through the skin and fascia of the plantar foot. Surgical procedure was carried out as previously described.12,23 Sham-operated animals were anesthetized only; no incision was made.
The mechanical threshold of 50% was determined before and after incision with a series of flexible nylon von Frey filaments of increasing stiffness (0.02–10 g) using the Up-and-Down method,24 as previously described.12 The mechanical hyperalgesia of all groups was assessed from 0.15 h to 6 days after surgery, when necessary.
For spontaneous nociception measurement, the guarding behavior was observed as described by Xu and Brennan,25 with a few modifications. The incised and nonincised hind paws were closely observed for a 1-min period and repeated every 30 min from 0.5 h up to 6 h after surgery and twice a day (at 30-min intervals) from 1 up to 6 days after surgery. According to the position of the hind paw at the time of the observation, a score of 0, 1, or 2 was assigned. For each hind paw, a sum score was obtained by adding the two scores every 30 min.
Back to Top | Article Outline
A selective PAR-2 antagonist (N3-methylbutyryl-N-6-aminohexanoyl-piperazine: ENMD-1068, 1–100 nmol/paw, intraplantar, an inhibitor of tryptase (gabexate mesylate, 0.1–1 nmol/paw, intraplantar) or vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, 20 µl/paw, intraplantar) was administered 0.5 h before the incision or the sham procedure. Tryptase, a PAR-2 activator (5 ng/paw, intraplantar) was administered 0.5 h before ENMD-1068, gabexate, or vehicle in the sham-operated mice. In other groups of animals, ENMD-1068 (100 nmol/paw, intraplantar), gabexate (1 nmol/paw, intraplantar) or vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, 20 µl/paw, intraplantar) was also administered 0.5 or 24 h after incision of the mice. Cromoglycate (200 µg/paw), a mast cell membrane stabilizer, was administered daily by intraplantar route 15 min before the incision and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 days after incision, always 1 h before a new nociception measurement. Ketotifen (10 mg/kg), another mast cell membrane stabilizer, was administered daily by an oral route for 5 days before the incision and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 days after incision. Animals were submitted to surgical procedure 1 h after the last oral injection of ketotifen, always 1 h before a new nociception measurement. Compound 48/80, that promotes depletion of mast cell mediators, was administered daily at increasing doses (1, 3, 10, and 10 µg/paw, intraplantar), and animals were submitted to plantar incision 24 h after the last injection of compound 48/80. The dosages and timing of the drugs were obtained from in-pilot experiments or by previous studies.12,26–29 To avoid preventable discomfort for the animals, the effects of the drugs were observed just until the end of the antinociception.
To evaluate whether the compounds alone were able to alter the mechanical threshold of animals, sham-operated animals received an intraplantar administration of those compounds. As a positive control, lidocaine was used.30
Back to Top | Article Outline
Measurement of Tryptase Activity
To confirm the mast cell depletion produced by repeated treatment with compound 48/80, separate groups of mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation 24 h after the final injection of compound 48/80. Tryptase activity was measured in the homogenates of the paw skin of animals as described by Hoffmeister et al.27
Paw skin samples were homogenized and centrifuged, and the resulting supernatants were used to evaluate tryptase activity. The enzymatic activity of tryptase was determined by measuring the hydrolysis of the substrate N-p-Tosyl-Gly-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide to its product p-nitroanilide in a spectrophotometer at 405 nm.
Separate groups of animals were submitted to a surgical or sham procedure, and 10, 30, or 60 min after surgery, the animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation. The operated or sham-operated paws were perfused as previously described31 and tryptase activity was measured in the perfusates.
Back to Top | Article Outline
We carried out histological analyses in paw tissue samples 10 min after sham or surgical procedures to confirm the mast cell degranulation as described previoulsy.12 The presence of intact and degranulated mast cells was semi-quantified by mast cell counting in representative slides of the paw tissue of sham-operated and operated animals.32 Results were represented as the percentage of degranulated mast cells relative to the total number of mast cells.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis
The results are expressed as means ± SEM, except for the ID50 values (i.e., the gabexate or ENMD-1068 dose that reduces nociceptive responses to the order of 50% relative to the control value), which were expressed as geometric means accompanied by their respective 95% confidence limits, and the spontaneous nociception scores, which were reported as medians and interquartile ranges. Spontaneous nociception scores were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. All other data were analyzed using the Student t test (two-tailed), a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s post hoc test or a two-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni correction when appropriate. To meet parametric assumptions, the data on the 50% mechanical threshold were log transformed before the analysis. All statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Software 5.0 (San Diego, CA). P values less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) were considered significant, and F values presented in the text are demonstrated by treatment versus time interactions.
Back to Top | Article Outline


The Prevention of the Mast Cell Degranulation Reduced Postoperative Hyperalgesia
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Animals submitted to surgical procedures presented mechanical hyperalgesia from 0.15 h up to 5 days after surgery, when compared with sham-operated animals (fig. 1A). We verified that the depletion of mast cell mediators by repeated treatment with the compound 48/80 (1, 3, 10, and 10 µg/paw, intraplantar) was able to substantially prevent the postoperative hyperalgesia from 0.15 h up to 5 days after surgery [F (24, 192) = 4.30, P < 0.0001; fig. 1A]. The pre-treatment with the mast cell membrane stabilizers cromoglycate (200 µg/paw, intraplantar) or ketotifen (10 mg × kg−1 × day−1, oral route) was also capable of reducing the hyperalgesia of animals [F (12, 132) = 6.27, P < 0.0001; fig. 1B and F (12, 120) = 3.21, P < 0.001; fig. 1C, respectively]. However, the antihyperalgesic effect of pretreatment with cromoglycate was shorter (up to 1 day) than with ketotifen, which prevented hyperalgesia from 0.15 h up to 4 days after surgery.
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Inhibition of Tryptase Activity or PAR-2 Antagonism Prevents the Development of Postoperative Nociception
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Pre-treatment (30 min before the surgery) with gabexate (1 nmol/paw, intraplantar), a selective tryptase inhibitor, reduced mechanical hyperalgesia in mice from 0.15 to 1 h after surgery [F (5, 45) = 3.56, P < 0.01; fig. 2A]. Its antihyperalgesic effect occurred at doses of 0.1 and 1 nmol/paw, the calculated inhibitory dose value was 0.30 (0.07–1.22) nmol/paw, and the maximum inhibition was 76 ± 15% 0.5 h after surgery (fig. 2B).
Similarly, pretreatment with the selective PAR-2 antagonist ENMD-1068 (100 nmol/paw, intraplantar) was also able to prevent postoperative hyperalgesia in mice from 0.15 to 2 h after surgery [F (5, 50) = 5.03, P < 0.0001; fig. 2C]. The antihyperalgesic effect occurred at a dose of 100 nmol/paw, the calculated inhibitory dose value was 59 (27–130) nmol/paw, and the maximum inhibition was 80 ± 13% at 1 h after surgery (fig. 2D).
The administration of all compounds tested did not alter the mechanical threshold of sham-operated animals, which demonstrated that the effects of compounds were specific to postoperative hyperalgesia (data not shown). On the other hand, the local anesthesia with lidocaine increased the mechanical threshold of animals (data not shown).
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Inhibition of Tryptase Ativity, the PAR-2 Antagonism, or the Mast Cell Membrane Stabilization Prevents the Development of Spontaneous Nociception
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Animals submitted to surgical procedures presented spontaneous nociception from 0.5 h up to 2 days after surgery, when compared with sham-operated animals, with maximal effect from 0.5 to 1 h after surgery (data not shown). In addition to preventing mechanical hyperalgesia, preadministration of either gabexate (1 nmol/paw, intraplantar), ENMD-1068 (100 nmol/paw, intraplantar), cromoglycate (200 µg/paw, intraplantar) or ketotifen (10 mg × kg−1 × day−1, oral route) was capable of preventing spontaneous nociception in the operated animals from 0.5 to 1 h after surgery (fig. 3).
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Injection of Tryptase in the Hind Paw Mimics Surgery-inducing Hyperalgesia
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools
Similar to plantar surgery, the intraplantar injection of tryptase (5 ng/paw, intraplantar) was able to produce mechanical hyperalgesia in mice [F (7, 63) = 6.01, P < 0.0001; fig. 4A]. This hyperalgesic effect occurred from 10 min to 6 h after its administration. Pretreatment with gabexate (1 nmol/paw, intraplantar F (10, 60) = 5.40, P < 0.0001; fig. 4B) or ENMD-1068 (100 nmol/paw, intraplantar F (10, 65) = 5.79, P < 0.0001; fig. 4C) largely prevented reduction in the mechanical threshold induced by tryptase from as early as 10 min lasting up to 2 h, with inhibition peaking at 100% and 88 ± 14%, respectively.
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Inhibition of Tryptase, the PAR-2 Antagonism, or the Mast Cell Membrane Stabilization Does Not Reverse the Established Postoperative Nociception
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Image Tools
In contrast to the results obtained with pretreatment, gabexate (1 nmol/paw, intraplantar), ENMD-1068 (100 nmol/paw, intraplantar) or cromoglycate (200 µg/paw, intraplantar) were not able to reverse the established postoperative hyperalgesia when they were administered 30 min or 24 h after the incision (fig. 5, A−F), [F (6, 78) = 0.62, P = 0.71 fig. 5A; F (6, 60) = 0.83, P = 0.60 fig. 5B; (F (6, 60) = 1.76, P = 0.12 fig. 5C; F (6, 60) = 0.83, P = 0.54 fig. 5D; F (6, 60) = 0.32, P = 0.93 fig. 5E; F (6, 60) = 0.47, P = 0.83 fig. 5F].
Back to Top | Article Outline
Incision Induces An Early Mast Cell Degranulation and Tryptase Release
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Image Tools
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Image Tools
The plantar surgery increased the activity of tryptase two-fold in the paw tissue perfusate of the operated mice when compared with the sham-operated animals 10 min, but not 30 or 60 min after surgery (fig. 6; F(2,30)= 6.73, P < 0.01), indicating an early postoperative tryptase release by mast cells. Accordingly, we also detected mast cell degranulation (percentage of degranulated mast cells was 3.6% and 29.8 ± 3.4% in sham-operated and operated animals, respectively) as early as 10 min after the surgery using histological analyses (fig. 7).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Treatments That Prevent Postoperative Nociception Also Reduced Tryptase Activity In Paw Tissue and Its Release after Incision
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Image Tools
We next used two different approaches to confirm the critical role of tryptase in postoperative pain. First, we determined that the depletion of mast cell mediators by repeat treatment with compound 48/80 was able to largely reduce the tryptase activity in the paw skin of mice (inhibition of 81 ± 14%, fig. 8A) as well as reduce the postoperative hyperalgesia (fig. 1A). Second, we also observed that the pre-treatment of the mice with the mast cell membrane stabilizer cromoglycate (200 μg/paw, intraplantar) fully prevented the increase in tryptase activity (100% inhibition, fig. 8B) and the mechanical hyperalgesia after the surgical procedure (fig. 1B).
Back to Top | Article Outline


Previously, we showed that surgery causes mast cell degranulation and increases local histamine and serotonin levels.12 The prevention of mast cell degranulation largely reduces hyperalgesia up to 4 days after surgery. In this study, we extended our previous findings showing that the prevention of mast cell degranulation reduced not only postoperative hyperalgesia, but also spontaneous nociception throughout the postoperative period. The compound 48/80 leads to the degranulation of mast cells, promoting the release of mediators such as histamine, serotonin, and tryptase.12,33,34 However, the repeat administration of compound 48/80 results in the depletion of these mediators.12,35 We demonstrated that mast cell depletion in mice was able to prevent nociception of the animals throughout the postoperative period. Moreover, we also verified that cromoglycate and ketotifen were also able to prevent the mechanical and spontaneous nociception of operated animals, in accordance with previous data demonstrating mast cell stabilizers as capable of protecting mast cell membranes, thereby hindering their degranulation.12,29,36 Cromoglycate presented an antinociceptive effect up to 24 h after surgery. Since cromoglycate presented a shorter antinociceptive effect than compound 48/80, we confirmed the role of mast cells in postoperative pain, testing another mast cell stabilizer, ketotifen. Ketotifen was chosen since it clinically presented an analgesic effect in irritable bowel disease and neurofibroma, as well as improved quality of life and relieved abdominal cramps in patients after extensive abdominal surgery.37–39 Ketotifen, in the same route and dosage schedule (oral route, treatment before and after surgery) of the clinical studies, was able to prevent postoperative nociception up to 4 days after operation. The longer effect of ketotifen (that was orally pretreated once a day, 5 days before surgery) in relation to cromoglycate (that was locally pretreated only 15 min before surgery) is not unexpected since the repeated pretreatment with this class of drugs seems to cause more long-lasting effects to mast cell stabilization.29 These new findings reinforce the idea of the critical role of mast cells in postoperative pain and indicate that the pretreatment with mast cell stabilizers, such as ketotifen, could be useful to prevent pain aside from other postoperative problems.
In our previous study,12 the antagonism of histamine or serotonin receptors only partially decreased postoperative hyperalgesia in mice, suggesting that other mast cell-derived mediators are involved. Histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques have demonstrated that the serine protease tryptase is localized exclusively in mast cells and may be used as an indicator of mast cell activation.40,41 However, the role of tryptase in painful processes is largely unknown. Clinical studies have demonstrated that tryptases are released in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and they can directly stimulate sensory neurons, generating hypersensitivity symptoms.15,39
We also observed that the selective tryptase inhibitor, gabexate, was capable of preventing postoperative nociception. Notably, a recent study demonstrated that intestinal handling during open gynecological surgery promoted mast cell degranulation with the subsequent local release of tryptase (conventional laparotomy), whereas a minimally invasive technique (laparoscopy) did not result in tryptase release.41 Knowing that laparoscopy is associated with less postoperative pain compared to conventional laparotomy,42 our results indicate that mast cells may be involved in postoperative pain, especially where surgical manipulation is more extensive.
Tryptase is a selective and endogenous agonist of PAR-2. Several studies have indicated that PAR-2 is involved in a number of inflammatory diseases, including arthritis, skin inflammation, and inflammatory bowel diseases.18 However, the role of PAR-2 in painful processes has not yet been fully elucidated. Injections of synthetic PAR-2 agonists have been demonstrated to promote mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in rats and mice.26,43 Recently, synthetic agonists of PAR-2 were shown to be unselective, as they also activate Mas-related G protein-coupled receptors.44 Furthermore, the role of the PAR-2 blockade in the development of nociception is based only on the use of PAR-2-deficient mice, which demonstrate few signs of mast cell degranulation-induced hyperalgesia and formalin-induced hyperalgesia.26 Unfortunately, these data must be interpreted with caution as PAR-2-deficient mice demonstrate a marked compensatory response to PAR-1 activation.45 Thus, preclinical trials with PAR-2 antagonists are important tools to reveal the role of PAR-2 in painful processes. Previous studies have shown that the selective PAR-2 antagonist ENMD-1068 has antiinflammatory activity in murine models of arthritis.46,47 In this study, we observed that pretreatment with ENMD-1068 was able to prevent both mechanical hyperalgesia and spontaneous nociception after surgery, indicating that PAR-2 is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of postoperative pain.
Confirming our findings with tryptase inhibition and PAR-2 antagonism in accordance with studies performed in rats,26 the injection of the selective and endogenous PAR-2 agonist tryptase into the mice’s hind paws mimicked postoperative nociception and resulted in hyperalgesia. Moreover, gabexate and ENMD-1068 were able to prevent this tryptase-induced hyperalgesia. This finding is consistent with our results on postoperative pain, where both drugs were capable of reducing postoperative nociception by preventing the activation the PAR-2 receptor. In contrast to the postoperative findings, tryptase-induced hyperalgesia occurs within the first 6 h after its administration, whereas pain due to a surgical procedure lasts about 5 days.12,23 This finding indicates that tryptase is implicated in early postoperative pain and other pronociceptive mediators are important in maintaining the continuation of pain. In fact, nerve growth factor, interleukins and prostaglandin E2 have all been demonstrated to be released late after the incision.48–52
Confirming the early involvement of mast cells and tryptase in postoperative pain, cromoglycate, ENMD-1068 or gabexate administration 30 min or 24 h after the surgery was unable to alter the intensity of postoperative nociception. Furthermore, we detected early mast cell degranulation and tryptase release 10 min after the surgery, demonstrating an early role of mast cells in postoperative pain. Thus, our results show that tryptase, PAR-2, or mast cell inhibition is not useful in reducing postoperative hyperalgesia once mast cell degranulation, tryptase release, nociceptor activation, and the start of pain have already occurred. Furthermore, possible therapeutic strategies to treat postoperative pain targeting mast cell mediators must be preventative. Of note, recent studies have indicated that preventative analgesia is promising for the treatment of persistent postoperative pain.53
To provide additional evidence for the critical role of tryptase in postoperative pain, we employed different approaches for confirmation. We demonstrated that the cromoglycate fully prevented the tryptase release in the perfusate, and the compound 48/80 substantially reduced the tryptase activity in the incised tissue. Furthermore, they were able to prevent postoperative hyperalgesia in the animals. These findings are in accordance with previous results demonstrating cromoglycate as capable of protecting mast cell membranes, and of preventing the nociception induced by surgical injury.12 Thus, the early degranulation of mast cells and the release of their pro-nociceptive mediators appear to play a critical role in the development of postoperative nociception in mice.
In addition to hyperalgesia, patients undergoing surgery also have ongoing, unprovoked pain that is measured as pain at rest and is a common patient complaint.54,55 Unprovoked pain-related behavior (namely, guarding) after a rodent plantar incision has been described and suggested to correlate to the pain at rest in patients.25,56,57 Here, we have demonstrated that tryptase inhibition, PAR-2 antagonism, or mast cell stabilizing not only reduced hyperalgesia but also prevented the guarding behavior induced by surgery. This finding reinforces the important role of mast cell tryptase and PAR-2 in several painful symptoms that occur in the postoperative period.
Many conditions associated with mast cell degranulation, such as allergies, and some drug administration do not result in pain. However, many painful conditions are associated with the degranulation of mast cells, such as irritable bowel syndrome,13,15 laparoscopy,39,41 chronic pancreatitis,58 and migraines,59 among others. These differences may be observed because in painful conditions, other cellular and vascular events that facilitate nociceptor activation and mast cell activation must occur. Besides mast cell mediators, the tissue damage causes the release of intracellular contents including protons, adenosine triphosphate, and mediators, such as nerve growth factor, important in inducing nociceptor and mast cell activation as well postoperative pain.48–50,60–63 Another important point is the fact that mast cell mediators are released in proximity to nerves in painful conditions, which is relevant to pain/discomfort development.13 Thus, mast cell degranulation alone seems not to be sufficient to promote pain, but it may contribute to pain after tissue damage.
The local administration of certain drugs has been suggested to be able to exert nonspecific antinociceptive effects by acting as local anesthetics.64 We have detected that the drugs used in this study did not alter the mechanical threshold of the sham-operated animals at the doses that result in the prevention of postoperative nociception. However, lidocaine, used as a positive control, increased the mechanical threshold of the sham-operated animals. Moreover, our results clearly demonstrate that the effect of mast cell stabilization, tryptase inhibition, or PAR-2 antagonism is specific to postoperative hyperalgesia and not to the detection of normal mechanical stimuli.
Taken together, our findings suggest that mast cell degranulation with the subsequent release of tryptase and PAR-2 activation are potential targets for the development of novel therapies to prevent, but not reverse, postoperative pain.
Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618–25

2. Gandhi K, Heitz JW, Viscusi ER. Challenges in acute pain management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29:291–309

3. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Gawande AA. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: A modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet. 2008;372:139–44

4. Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011;377:2215–25

5. Dahl JB, Kehlet HMcMahon SB. Postoperative pain and its management, The Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pai. 20065th edition Koltzenburg M. Philadelphia Churchill Linvigstone:pp 635–51

6. Alkaitis MS, Solorzano C, Landry RP, Piomelli D, DeLeo JA, Romero-Sandoval EA. Evidence for a role of endocannabinoids, astrocytes and p38 phosphorylation in the resolution of postoperative pain. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10891

7. Flatters SJ. Characterization of a model of persistent postoperative pain evoked by skin/muscle incision and retraction (SMIR). Pain. 2008;135:119–30

8. Clark JD, Shi X, Li X, Qiao Y, Liang D, Angst MS, Yeomans DC. Morphine reduces local cytokine expression and neutrophil infiltration after incision. Mol Pain. 2007;3:28

9. Swarm RA, Karanikolas M, Kalauokalani D. Pain treatment in the perioperative period. Curr Probl Surg. 2001;38:835–920

10. Ren K, Dubner R. Interactions between the immune and nervous systems in pain. Nat Med. 2010;16:1267–76

11. Egozi EI, Ferreira AM, Burns AL, Gamelli RL, Dipietro LA. Mast cells modulate the inflammatory but not the proliferative response in healing wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11:46–54

12. Oliveira SM, Drewes CC, Silva CR, Trevisan G, Boschen SL, Moreira CG, de Almeida Cabrini D, Da Cunha C, Ferreira J. Involvement of mast cells in a mouse model of postoperative pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;672:88–95

13. Barbara G, Stanghellini V, De Giorgio R, Cremon C, Cottrell GS, Santini D, Pasquinelli G, Morselli-Labate AM, Grady EF, Bunnett NW, Collins SM, Corinaldesi R. Activated mast cells in proximity to colonic nerves correlate with abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:693–702

14. Barbara G, Wang B, Stanghellini V, de Giorgio R, Cremon C, Di Nardo G, Trevisani M, Campi B, Geppetti P, Tonini M, Bunnett NW, Grundy D, Corinaldesi R. Mast cell-dependent excitation of visceral-nociceptive sensory neurons in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:26–37

15. Cenac N, Andrews CN, Holzhausen M, Chapman K, Cottrell G, Andrade-Gordon P, Steinhoff M, Barbara G, Beck P, Bunnett NW, Sharkey KA, Ferraz JG, Shaffer E, Vergnolle N. Role for protease activity in visceral pain in irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:636–47

16. Molino M, Barnathan ES, Numerof R, Clark J, Dreyer M, Cumashi A, Hoxie JA, Schechter N, Woolkalis M, Brass LF. Interactions of mast cell tryptase with thrombin receptors and PAR-2 J Biol Chem. 1997;272:4043–9

17. Fox MT, Harriott P, Walker B, Stone SR. Identification of potential activators of proteinase-activated receptor-2. FEBS Lett. 1997;417:267–9

18. Vergnolle N. Protease-activated receptors as drug targets in inflammation and pain. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;123:292–309

19. Steinhoff M, Corvera CU, Thoma MS, Kong W, McAlpine BE, Caughey GH, Ansel JC, Bunnett NW. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 in human skin: Tissue distribution and activation of keratinocytes by mast cell tryptase. Exp Dermatol. 1999;8:282–94

20. Cenac N, Coelho AM, Nguyen C, Compton S, Andrade-Gordon P, MacNaughton WK, Wallace JL, Hollenberg MD, Bunnett NW, Garcia-Villar R, Bueno L, Vergnolle N. Induction of intestinal inflammation in mouse by activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:1903–15

21. Steinhoff M, Buddenkotte J, Shpacovitch V, Rattenholl A, Moormann C, Vergnolle N, Luger TA, Hollenberg MD. Proteinase-activated receptors: Transducers of proteinase-mediated signaling in inflammation and immune response. Endocr Rev. 2005;26:1–43

22. Vergnolle N, Ferazzini M, D’Andrea MR, Buddenkotte J, Steinhoff M. Proteinase-activated receptors: Novel signals for peripheral nerves. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:496–500

23. Pogatzki EM, Raja SN. A mouse model of incisional pain. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2003;99:1023–7

24. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;53:55–63

25. Xu J, Brennan TJ. Guarding pain and spontaneous activity of nociceptors after skin versus skin plus deep tissue incision. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2010;112:153–64

26. Vergnolle N, Bunnett NW, Sharkey KA, Brussee V, Compton SJ, Grady EF, Cirino G, Gerard N, Basbaum AI, Andrade-Gordon P, Hollenberg MD, Wallace JL. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 and hyperalgesia: A novel pain pathway. Nat Med. 2001;7:821–6

27. Hoffmeister C, Trevisan G, Rossato MF, de Oliveira SM, Gomez MV, Ferreira J. Role of TRPV1 in nociception and edema induced by monosodium urate crystals in rats. Pain. 2011;152:1777–88

28. Kelso EB, Ferrell WR, Lockhart JC, Elias-Jones I, Hembrough T, Dunning L, Gracie JA, McInnes IB. Expression and proinflammatory role of proteinase-activated receptor 2 in rheumatoid synovium: Ex vivo studies using a novel proteinase-activated receptor 2 antagonist. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:765–71

29. Serna H, Porras M, Vergara P. Mast cell stabilizer ketotifen [4-(1-methyl-4-piperidylidene)-4h-benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-b]thiophen-10(9H)-one fumarate] prevents mucosal mast cell hyperplasia and intestinal dysmotility in experimental Trichinella spiralis inflammation in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319:1104–11

30. Wang JT, Chung CC, Whitehead RA, Schwarz SK, Ries CR, MacLeod BA. Effects of local tramadol administration on peripheral glutamate-induced nociceptive behaviour in mice. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:659–63

31. Ferreira J, da Silva GL, Calixto JB. Contribution of vanilloid receptors to the overt nociception induced by B2 kinin receptor activation in mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;141:787–94

32. Xanthos DN, Gaderer S, Drdla R, Nuro E, Abramova A, Ellmeier W, Sandkühler J. Central nervous system mast cells in peripheral inflammatory nociception. Mol Pain. 2011;7:42

33. Kivinen PK, Kaminska R, Naukkarinen A, Harvima RJ, Horsmanheimo M, Harvima IT. Release of soluble tryptase but only minor amounts of chymase activity from cutaneous mast cells. Exp Dermatol. 2001;10:246–55

34. Paton WD. Compound 48/80: A potent histamine liberator. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1951;6:499–508

35. Di Rosa M, Giroud JP, Willoughby DA. Studies on the mediators of the acute inflammatory response induced in rats in different sites by carrageenan and turpentine. J Pathol. 1971;104:15–29

36. Parada CA, Tambeli CH, Cunha FQ, Ferreira SH. The major role of peripheral release of histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine in formalin-induced nociception. Neuroscience. 2001;102:937–44

37. Riccardi VM. A controlled multiphase trial of ketotifen to minimize neurofibroma-associated pain and itching. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:577–81

38. The FO, Buist MR, Lei A, Bennink RJ, Hofland J, van den Wijngaard RM, de Jonge WJ, Boeckxstaens GE. The role of mast cell stabilization in treatment of postoperative ileus: A pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2257–66

39. Klooker TK, Braak B, Koopman KE, Welting O, Wouters MM, van der Heide S, Schemann M, Bischoff SC, van den Wijngaard RM, Boeckxstaens GE. The mast cell stabiliser ketotifen decreases visceral hypersensitivity and improves intestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2010;59:1213–21

40. Chen Z, Irani AA, Bradford TR, Craig SS, Newlands G, Miller H, Huff T, Simmons WH, Schwartz LB. Localization of rat tryptase to a subset of the connective tissue type of mast cell. J Histochem Cytochem. 1993;41:961–9

41. The FO, Bennink RJ, Ankum WM, Buist MR, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van der Heide S, van den Wijngaard RM, de Jonge WJ, Boeckxstaens GE. Intestinal handling-induced mast cell activation and inflammation in human postoperative ileus. Gut. 2008;57:33–40

42. Claerhout F, Deprest J. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19:357–75

43. Kawabata A, Kawao N, Kuroda R, Tanaka A, Itoh H, Nishikawa H. Peripheral PAR-2 triggers thermal hyperalgesia and nociceptive responses in rats. Neuroreport. 2001;12:715–9

44. Liu Q, Weng HJ, Patel KN, Tang Z, Bai H, Steinhoff M, Dong X. The distinct roles of two GPCRs, MrgprC11 and PAR2, in itch and hyperalgesi. Sci Signal. 2011;181:ra45

45. Damiano BP, Cheung WM, Santulli RJ, Fung-Leung WP, Ngo K, Ye RD, Darrow AL, Derian CK, de Garavilla L, Andrade-Gordon P. Cardiovascular responses mediated by protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) and thrombin receptor (PAR-1) are distinguished in mice deficient in PAR-2 or PAR-1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:671–8

46. Kelso EB, Lockhart JC, Hembrough T, Dunning L, Plevin R, Hollenberg MD, Sommerhoff CP, McLean JS, Ferrell WR. Therapeutic promise of proteinase-activated receptor-2 antagonism in joint inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;316:1017–24

47. Ferrell WR, Kelso EB, Lockhart JC, Plevin R, McInnes IB. Protease-activated receptor 2: A novel pathogenic pathway in a murine model of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:2051–4

48. Woo YC, Park SS, Subieta AR, Brennan TJ. Changes in tissue pH and temperature after incision indicate acidosis may contribute to postoperative pain. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2004;101:468–75

49. Wu C, Boustany L, Liang H, Brennan TJ. Nerve growth factor expression after plantar incision in the rat. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2007;107:128–35

50. Wu C, Erickson MA, Xu J, Wild KD, Brennan TJ. Expression profile of nerve growth factor after muscle incision in the rat. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2009;110:140–9

51. Carvalho B, Clark DJ, Yeomans D, Angst MS. Collecting and measuring nociceptive and inflammatory mediators in surgical wounds. J Vis Exp. 2008;29:20

52. Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Berger RA, Hallab NJ, Saha C, Negrescu C, Moric M, Caicedo MS, Tuman KJ. Upregulation of prostaglandin E2 and interleukins in the central nervous system and peripheral tissue during and after surgery in humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2006;104:403–10

53. Dahl JB, Kehlet H. Preventive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:331–8

54. Dahl JB, Kehlet H. The value of pre-emptive analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:434–9

55. Xu J, Brennan TJ. Comparison of skin incision vs. skin plus deep tissue incision on ongoing pain and spontaneous activity in dorsal horn neurons. Pain. 2009;144:329–39

56. Brennan TJ, Vandermeulen EP, Gebhart GF. Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. Pain. 1996;64:493–501

57. Martin TJ, Buechler NL, Kahn W, Crews JC, Eisenach JC. Effects of laparotomy on spontaneous exploratory activity and conditioned operant responding in the rat: A model for postoperative pain. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2004;101:191–203

58. Hoogerwerf WA, Gondesen K, Xiao SY, Winston JH, Willis WD, Pasricha PJ. The role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of pain in chronic pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2005;5:8

59. Levy D, Burstein R, Kainz V, Jakubowski M, Strassman AM. Mast cell degranulation activates a pain pathway underlying migraine headache. Pain. 2007;130:166–76

60. Tsuda M, Koizumi S, Inoue K. Role of endogenous ATP at the incision area in a rat model of postoperative pain. Neuroreport. 2001;12:1701–4

61. Zahn PK, Subieta A, Park SS, Brennan TJ. Effect of blockade of nerve growth factor and tumor necrosis factor on pain behaviors after plantar incision. J Pain. 2004;5:157–63

62. Banik RK, Subieta AR, Wu C, Brennan TJ. Increased nerve growth factor after rat plantar incision contributes to guarding behavior and heat hyperalgesia. Pain. 2005;117:68–76

63. Deval E, Noël J, Gasull X, Delaunay A, Alloui A, Friend V, Eschalier A, Lazdunski M, Lingueglia E. Acid-sensing ion channels in postoperative pain. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6059–66

64. Reeh P. TRPA1-mediated nociception: Response to letter by Fischer et al. Neuroscience. 2008;155:339; author reply 340

Cited By:

This article has been cited 2 time(s).

A novel, potent, oral active and safe antinociceptive pyrazole targeting kappa opioid receptors
Trevisan, G; Rossato, MF; Walker, CIB; Oliveira, SM; Rosa, F; Tonello, R; Silva, CR; Machado, P; Boligon, AA; Martins, MAP; Zanatta, N; Bonacorso, HG; Athayde, ML; Rubin, MA; Calixto, JB; Ferreira, J
Neuropharmacology, 73(): 261-273.
Mast cell activation contributes to sickle cell pathobiology and pain in mice
Vincent, L; Vang, D; Nguyen, J; Gupta, M; Luk, K; Ericson, ME; Simone, DA; Gupta, K
Blood, 122(): 1853-1862.
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.

Article Tools