Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2013 - Volume 118 - Issue 1 > Fibrinogen Concentrate and Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in H...
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182715d6c
Editorial Views

Fibrinogen Concentrate and Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in High-risk Surgery

Faraday, Nauder M.D., M.P.H.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Photo: J. P. Rathmel...
Photo: J. P. Rathmel...
Image Tools
“Physicians have long sought alternatives to transfusion of allogeneic blood products for managing patients with or at risk of excessive blood loss.… [F]ibrinogen concentrates [demonstrate] clear potential [as such an alternative].”
PHYSICIANS have long sought alternatives to transfusion of allogeneic blood products for managing patients with or at risk of excessive blood loss. The complications of allogeneic blood, including transfusion reactions, transmission of infectious agents, and acute lung injury, are well known; however, the repletion of the cellular and soluble components of blood becomes necessary when the losses (and attendant volume resuscitation) themselves contribute to ineffective hemostasis. The appropriate trigger for the administration of platelets and plasma coagulation factors is controversial, as is the proper sequence for their administration and methodology for preparing factor replacement products. In this issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY, Rahe-Meyer et al.1 report data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating potential of fibrinogen concentrate as a first-line therapy to reduce transfusion in patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures.
Fibrinogen (factor I) is a large glycoprotein (340 kDa) that circulates as a soluble plasma component. Its plasma concentration (approximately 150–400 mg/dl) is exceeded only by albumin and immunoglobulins, and as an acute phase protein, its concentration increases after surgery and trauma, often exceeding 600 mg/dl. Fibrinogen plays two critical roles in hemostasis. First, in its soluble form, it serves as the ligand for activated GPIIb-IIIa receptors on platelets, constituting the cross bridges among platelets required for aggregation and primary hemostatic plug formation. Second, when cleaved by thrombin (factor IIa), fibrinogen is converted into fibrin, which polymerizes into an insoluble form that stabilizes the hemostatic plug and provides a firm meshwork for clot propagation.
The appropriate plasma concentration for fibrinogen in the bleeding patient is not known; however, both recent laboratory and clinical studies suggest that higher is better.2 Indeed, before 2008, transfusion guidelines from American and European societies recommended a plasma fibrinogen target of approximately 100 mg/dl, whereas more recent European guidelines target levels of 150–200 mg/dl2. Recommendations are based primarily on expert opinion and laboratory studies with few RCTs to guide treatment. The saturation of platelet fibrinogen receptors and normal clot initiation in vitro, as assessed by prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times, are known to occur at fibrinogen concentrations at or below the 100 mg/dl threshold.3,4 However, clot formation in vivo is far more complex than these few in vitro tests might suggest. Recent laboratory studies demonstrate a direct relationship between fibrinogen concentration and viscoelastic measures of clot strength that extends through the entire physiologic range for fibrinogen up to 1,000 mg/dl.4–6 These in vitro studies are corroborated by multiple observational studies and nonrandomized trials, which suggest improved hemostasis when fibrinogen concentrations exceed 200 mg/dl.7,8
In the prospective double-blinded RCT reported here, Rahe-Meyer et al.1 tested the hypothesis that the administration of fibrinogen concentrate, as first-line therapy for intraoperative bleeding, would reduce allogeneic blood transfusions in patients undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Subjects who developed intraoperative bleeding after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to receive intravenous injection of fibrinogen concentrate or matched placebo. Clinically relevant bleeding was defined as a 5-minute bleeding mass of 60–250 g, as measured by weight of surgical sponges, after protamine administration and appropriate surgical hemostasis. The dose of fibrinogen administered was targeted to achieve a thromboelastometry test result (fib-tem test on ROTEM device, Munich, Germany) of 22 mm for the maximum clot firmness test, which corresponds roughly to a fibrinogen concentration of 360 mg/dl. The median dose of fibrinogen administered was 8 g, and the mean values of maximum clot firmness and fibrinogen concentrations actually achieved were 16.2 (SD 2.8) mm and 260 (SD 48) mg/dl, respectively, which were both significantly higher than in the placebo group. Perioperative management in both groups was otherwise similar and protocolized, including a laboratory-based algorithm for transfusion of red cells, platelets, and fresh frozen plasma until a bleeding mass of less than 60 g was achieved intraoperatively and chest tube drainage was less than 400 mL/h in the intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was the total number of allogeneic units (red cells, platelets, and fresh frozen plasma) transfused in the 24 h after the administration of study drug.
Twenty-nine fibrinogen-treated and 32 placebo-treated participants were analyzed. The authors report a marked reduction in the total number of allogeneic units transfused between groups (median, 2 vs. 13; P value less than 0.0001 for fibrinogen and placebo, respectively), with significantly fewer units transfused for each of the blood components in the fibrinogen group. Although 45% of participants in the fibrinogen group avoided transfusion entirely, none avoided transfusion in the placebo group (P value less than 0.0001). The number of serious adverse events was similar between groups, with fewer deaths but a greater number of reoperations occurring in the fibrinogen-treated group. Fibrinogen levels were greater for the fibrinogen-treated group immediately after study drug administration but were similar by the day after surgery. One thrombotic complication occurred in each group.
Only two other prospective RCTs have been published examining the effect of fibrinogen administration on surgical bleeding. In a study of coronary bypass graft patients, 20 participants were randomized to receive 2 g of fibrinogen or no infusion immediately before surgery.9 Chest tube drainage was noted to be significantly lower (565 ± 150 vs. 830 ± 268 mL, P = 0.010) and hemoglobin significantly higher (11.0 ± 12.0 vs. 9.8 ± 8.0 g/dl, P = 0.018) in the fibrinogen-treated group on the day after surgery. One participant in the fibrinogen-treated and three in the control group received transfusions. In another study, patients undergoing cystectomy were randomized to receive fibrinogen infusion (45 mg/kg) or placebo after intraoperative bleeding, and volume resuscitation caused a 30% reduction in baseline hematocrit.10 Intraoperative transfusion of red cells and total red cell transfusion within 48 h of surgery were not different between groups, although transfusion in the postoperative phase alone was noted to be lower in the fibrinogen-treated group.
The reduction in transfusion from fibrinogen administration in the report by Rahe-Meyer et al.1 is impressive, and data from this study are consistent with other clinical and laboratory studies that examined the benefits of fibrinogen supplementation on hemostasis. However, enthusiasm for the administration of fibrinogen as a clinical therapy for bleeding in surgical patients must remain tempered at this time. Fewer than 100 total patients have thus far been studied in the setting of an RCT, and in one of the three trials, a clinically important reduction in transfusion was not identified. Although the study by Rahe-Meyer et al.1 is the most robust trial to date, it excluded patients who were at highest risk to bleed (e.g., recent antithrombotic therapy, more than 250 g of blood loss in 5 min) and at highest risk for thrombosis (e.g., recent myocardial infarction or stroke). Furthermore, both the criteria used to define clinical bleeding and the protocol used to guide transfusion management were of questionable clinical relevance. In addition, the authors did not design and analyze their study in accordance with true intention-to-treat principles. Thus, both the validity and generalizability of the authors’ findings cannot be determined with sufficient confidence at this time.
Several strategies have proven efficacy in reducing perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion including: use of intraoperative cell salvage,11 hemostasis testing-based transfusion algorithms,12–14 and antifibrinolytic agents.15,16 The efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate therapy remains unclear at this time. Nonetheless, the work of Rahe-Meyer et al.1 marks an important advance in the search for alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion in management of acquired bleeding disorders. The administration of fibrinogen concentrates demonstrates clear potential to improve hemostasis more rapidly and at lower risk of immunologic reactions, infection, and volume overload than conventional allogeneic blood products. Future studies should develop more clinically relevant treatment algorithms and use modern randomization strategies that adhere to intention-to-treat principles. Larger, multicenter RCTs should now move forward to determine whether the administration of fibrinogen concentrate improves clinical outcomes in surgical patients at an acceptable level of safety and cost.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Rahe-Meyer N, Solomon C, Hanke A, Schmidt DS, Knoerzer D, Hochleitner G, Sørensen B, Hagl C, Pichlmaier M. Effects of fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy during major aortic replacement surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2013;118:40–50

2. Bolliger D, Görlinger K, Tanaka KA. Pathophysiology and treatment of coagulopathy in massive hemorrhage and hemodilution. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2010;113:1205–19

3. Faraday N, Goldschmidt-Clermont P, Dise K, Bray PF. Quantitation of soluble fibrinogen binding to platelets by fluorescence-activated flow cytometry. J Lab Clin Med. 1994;123:728–40

4. Dempfle CE, Kälsch T, Elmas E, Suvajac N, Lücke T, Münch E, Borggrefe M. Impact of fibrinogen concentration in severely ill patients on mechanical properties of whole blood clots. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2008;19:765–70

5. Bolliger D, Szlam F, Molinaro RJ, Rahe-Meyer N, Levy JH, Tanaka KA. Finding the optimal concentration range for fibrinogen replacement after severe haemodilution: An in vitro model. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:793–9

6. Lang T, Johanning K, Metzler H, Piepenbrock S, Solomon C, Rahe-Meyer N, Tanaka KA. The effects of fibrinogen levels on thromboelastometric variables in the presence of thrombocytopenia. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:751–8

7. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernández-Mondéjar E, Hunt BJ, Komadina R, Nardi G, Neugebauer E, Ozier Y, Riddez L, Schultz A, Stahel PF, Vincent JL, Spahn DR. Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma: Management of bleeding following major trauma: An updated European guideline. Crit Care. 2010;14:R52

8. Levy JH, Szlam F, Tanaka KA, Sniecienski RM. Fibrinogen and hemostasis: A primary hemostatic target for the management of acquired bleeding. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:261–74

9. Karlsson M, Ternström L, Hyllner M, Baghaei F, Flinck A, Skrtic S, Jeppsson A. Prophylactic fibrinogen infusion reduces bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery. A prospective randomised pilot study. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102:137–44

10. Fenger-Eriksen C, Jensen TM, Kristensen BS, Jensen KM, Tønnesen E, Ingerslev J, Sørensen B. Fibrinogen substitution improves whole blood clot firmness after dilution with hydroxyethyl starch in bleeding patients undergoing radical cystectomy: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:795–802

11. Carless PA, Henry DA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Brown T, Fergusson DA. Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD001888

12. Shore-Lesserson L, Manspeizer HE, DePerio M, Francis S, Vela-Cantos F, Ergin MA. Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:312–9

13. Nuttall GA, Oliver WC, Santrach PJ, Bryant S, Dearani JA, Schaff HV, Ereth MH. Efficacy of a simple intraoperative transfusion algorithm for nonerythrocyte component utilization after cardiopulmonary bypass. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2001;94:773–81 discussion 5A–6A

14. Görlinger K, Dirkmann D, Hanke AA, Kamler M, Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Jakob H, Peters J. First-line therapy with coagulation factor concentrates combined with point-of-care coagulation testing is associated with decreased allogeneic blood transfusion in cardiovascular surgery: A retrospective, single-center cohort study. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2011;115:1179–91

15. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Stokes BJ, Fergusson DA, Ker K. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD001886

16. Ker K, Edwards P, Perel P, Shakur H, Roberts I. Effect of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding: systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e3054

© 2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share