Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2013 - Volume 118 - Issue 1 > Analysis of the Posterior Ramus of the Lumbar Spinal Nerve:...
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318272f40a
Perioperative Medicine

Analysis of the Posterior Ramus of the Lumbar Spinal Nerve: The Structure of the Posterior Ramus of the Spinal Nerve

Saito, Toshiyuki M.D., Ph.D.*; Steinke, Hanno Ph.D.; Miyaki, Takayoshi V.M.D., Ph.D.; Nawa, Shiro M.S.§; Umemoto, Kanae B.S.§; Miyakawa, Kunihisa M.D.; Wakao, Norimitsu M.D., Ph.D.#; Asamoto, Ken M.D., Ph.D.**; Nakano, Takashi M.D., Ph.D.**

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of neural anatomy is fundamental for safe, efficacious use of regional anesthesia. Spinal column procedures, such as a facet joint block, require an accurate understanding of neural pathways relative to anatomic structure. Since Bogduk’s report it has been known that human lumbar posterior ramus of the spinal nerve (PRSN) comprises three, equally sized primary branches. However, inconsistencies and controversy remain over the exact locations and pathways of the peripheral portions of the PRSN branches. In this study, the authors investigated the detailed anatomy of the human PRSN.
Methods: The authors performed ventral dissection in seven cadavers to determine the layout of the PRSN between T10 and L4 spinal segments. They captured three-dimensional images with a laser scanner. For fine detail analysis, specimens from another cadaver were subjected to a modified Spalteholz technique to render all nonnerve tissue transparent. Computer graphics were used to create a three-dimensional structural model.
Results: All three PRSN branches emanated from an ipsilateral origin and passed posterior to the transverse process. The medial PRSN branch consistently passed between the mammillary and accessory processes under the mammilloaccessory ligament. The intermediate branch passed between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles and extended to the skin. The lateral branch traveled far lateral from the origin.
Conclusions: The authors created a 3D model of the PRSN in the lumbar segment, which may be useful for planning surgical approaches to dorsal areas of the vertebral column. In addition, this knowledge may improve the accuracy of procedures involving the spinal column, particularly radiofrequency neurolysis of the facet joint.
Back to Top | Article Outline

What We Already Know about This Topic

* The posterior ramus of the spinal nerve is often targeted in the treatment of pain, yet there is controversy regarding its anatomy
Back to Top | Article Outline

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

* Using dissection and three-dimensional reconstruction in seven cadavers, the detailed anatomy of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve in the lumbar space is described
KNOWLEDGE of the anatomy of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve (PRSN) is essential for anesthetists to safely and successfully perform a facet joint block. In the major textbooks of anatomy, the PRSN is described as having two major initial branches: the lateral branch and the medial branch.1–4 In some textbooks, however, the description of PRSN anatomy is less clear.5–11 This lack of attention reflects the traditional view of anatomists that these nerves have no clinical significance. However, during the last 30 yr, increasing clinical attention has been paid to these nerves, both in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain and in the understanding of disability after spinal surgery. Anatomy textbooks have not kept pace with this interest.
In 1982, Bogduk et al.12 reported that the lumbar dorsal rami formed not two but three branches: a medial, a lateral, and an intermediate branch. This observation has not permeated textbooks of anatomy, although ironically some texts describe two branches but illustrate three.9,10 At present there are some textbooks that include confusing descriptions of the PRSN.9,10
Because the anatomy of the PRSN is fundamental for anesthesiology practice, we studied the disposition of the PRSN in thoracic and lumbar segments. In a previous article, we confirmed and extended Bogduk’s report by finding three branches of the PRSN in both the lumbar and thoracic segments,13 and we proposed the existence of three muscular units in the back of the body each supplied by a separate branch of the PRSN.14 We consider the transverse, accessory, and mammillary processes of the vertebral body and the three branches of PRSN resulting in three muscle–nerve compartments: the multifidus, longissimus, and the iliocostalis. On the basis of these data, we know that the human PRSN divides into three branches in both the lumbar and thoracic segments. What remains unknown is the peripheral course of these three branches. The current study investigates their topography by dissecting and tracking them in scan of cadaveric specimens.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

We studied the PRSN in eight donated human cadavers at the Aichi Medical University Department of Anatomy. Of these eight cadavers, seven were included in the dissection study, and one was used for study by transparent specimen. Aichi Medical University has its Institutional Review Board at Aichi Medical University, Nagakute City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan.
All donors gave directed consent that their cadavers were to be used in teaching or for research projects at the Institutes for Anatomy.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Study of Formaldehyde-fixed Cadavers
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
The seven cadavers were fixed in a 3% formaldehyde solution. The thoracolumbar vertebral column and the surrounding muscles were dissected from each body. We chose the ventral approach as described by Bogduk et al.12 to obtain a detailed image of the total nerve layout but modified it according to the study by Saito et al.13 The abdominal contents were first removed. The vertebral bodies were then separated from their pedicles and lifted away from the spinal canal. This exposed the neural elements of the spinal canal and their relationship to the pedicles, intervertebral foramina, and posterior elements of the spine for detailed inspection. Figure 1A shows the stage where half of the vertebral body was just removed to visualize the main stem of the spinal nerve (SN) of one side. Using this procedure, each SN and the main ramifications of its posterior ramus were identified easily. The ventral aspects of the spinal canal were opened to visualize the dural sac and the coverage to the SNs, whose branches could be easily followed. The pedicle of the vertebral arch was subsequently removed with the corresponding transverse process after examining them (fig. 1B, pink and blue parts). Nerves were then photographed, including the ventral rami, and the ramifications of the dorsal rami were tracked to the erector spinae divisions and to the skin. Each PRSN was ultimately dissected from its origin, and every branch was followed for as long as possible.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Three-dimensional data were acquired with the ERGOscan-laser scanner (Creaform, Québec, Canada) and CATIA software (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay Cedex, France) (fig. 2). The data were further processed with 3D computer graphic software (Light Wave 3D, NewTek Inc., San Antonio, TX). We scanned the region of PRSN by the ERGOscan-laser scanner after dissecting PRSN. The laser scanner gives a 3D image of the structure as the distance from the scanner to the exposed surface of PRSN. After acquiring the surface structure, the PRSN was isolated from the whole view with the CATIA software by erasing the polygons of the data, which represented surrounding tissue. A large number of measurements were required to record a 3D image of the PRSN structure. Then, we further dissected lumbar vertebrae. The shapes of the vertebrae were also scanned. We calibrated the zero point of the laser scanner to the origin of the investigated area, defined at the upper surface of the vertebral body of the fourth lumbar vertebra (fig. 2). X-axis was put to transverse axis, Y to vertical axis, and Z to sagittal axis. Data from each vertebral segment were compiled together into a single view in the whole region.
To interpret the segmental data by the laser scanner, we also made sketches of how the SN and PRSN were situated in the vertebral structures of each segment.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Study of Transparent Specimen
We produced 2-cm thick slices of transparent specimens from the blocks of lumbar vertebra together with the surrounding connective tissue and stained nerves, using an adaptation of the Spalteholz technique.15–18 Blocks of lumbar vertebra together with the surrounding muscle intact were dehydrated in acetone at −25°C, followed by vacuum extraction of the acetone and impregnation with oil. The oil rendered the muscles transparent, when the oil had the same refraction index as the muscles (n = 1.37), but the nerves retained a higher refractive index (n = 1.40) and, therefore, became visible. These findings in the transparent specimen helped us to refine the 3D anatomy of the PRSN in the erector spinae.19
Back to Top | Article Outline
Creation of the Whole 3D Data
The structure of the PRSN was visualized in a computer by graphic design in a 3D manner. The fragments of laser scanner data in the CATIA software were transferred to Light Wave 3D software. The fragments of data from each individual about PRSN and the lumbar vertebrae were digitally interconnected to re-create the whole anatomy of PRSN in the lumbar segments while referring to the information obtained in the sketch and the transparent specimen. The 3D coordinates data of PRSN and the vertebrae from seven cadavers were averaged, because the same points of the isolated structure were merged by averaging operation. The shape of the PRSN was colored yellow, and the vertebrae were colored white.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Dissection
After the removal of the vertebral bodies using the ventral approach, we were able to open the vertebral canal to display the meninges covering the ventral side of the spinal cord and of the SNs (fig. 1A). After the junction of the ventral and dorsal roots, each SN divides into one ventral and one dorsal ramus. The ventral approach to the SN revealed the origin and major branching of the PRSN without injuring the PRSN.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Findings of the PRSN
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Figure 3 shows the origin of the PRSN from the second lumbar nerve. It forms the vertical pillar of a T whose horizontal arms are the SN stem and the anterior ramus. From this finding, we infer that the PRSN is a branch, whereas the SN and the anterior ramus of the SN form a continuous stem. We identified the three major branches originating from the PRSN, thus confirming the findings of Bogduk et al.12 The lateral branch entered the iliocostalis.20 The two other branches cover the posterior side of the vertebral column. The intermediate branch is related to the longissimus/multifidus system and to the skin.14 The medial branch reached the area near the spinous process and the facet joints, as has been described by Bogduk et al.12 In the current study, we observed that the medial branch extended to the two subjacent segments.
Every branch of the posterior ramus was followed and traced from its origin until it became invisible. At each stage of dissection, we scanned the layout of the PRSN by the Laser-Scanner. Because the Laser-Scanner measured the distance from the scanner to the surface of the material, we isolated the layout of the periphery of the PRSN to store the data. The data of PRSN obtained by the Laser-Scanner were stored in the CATIA software.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools
We created transparent specimens of the region of interest for satisfactory analysis. Vertebral bone, fat tissue, and most of the muscle substance were made transparent. The material of the nerve tissue could be recognized by its faint colors and reflections. Because connective tissue and muscles remained intact in the slices, we could use this information to make refinements regarding the nerve patterns. Figure 4 shows the layout of the periphery of the three branches of the PRSN at L1 vertebra. It is clear how the three branches run in the erector spinae. In figure 4A, the three branches of the right PRSN at T12 SN can be seen. In the periphery of the medial branch, the branch is located posterior to the vertebral arch (arrow B). The intermediate (arrow C) and the lateral (arrow D) are going to the compartment of longissimus and of iliocostalis. Figure 4B, shows the SN and PRSN of L1 segment. We can also see the periphery of the medial branch from T12 segment (B). Figure 4D shows the branching of the PRSN of the right L1 SN. The medial branch (B) is turning around the superior articular process of L2 vertebra on the bony floor between the mammillary and the accessory processes.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Image Tools
With the sketch, by the connection of the fragmented data by the Laser-Scanner, and with the interpretation of the transparent specimen, a view of the 3D anatomy of the PRSN was rendered by means of a computer graphic drawing program (fig. 5A and B).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

It is traditionally taught that the PRSN divides into two branches, the medial and lateral branches.1,4,8–10,21–30 However, in 1982, Bogduk et al.12 reported that there was triple ramification of the PRSN between the L1 and L4 segments in humans, and that L5 had a different layout from the formerly described duplication. Before this report, Bogduk et al.31,32 had already reported similar triplication in some animals. In our previous studies, we confirmed this observation in nonhuman mammals and humans and extended it to the thoracic segments.13,14,33 We hypothesize that the reason for the discrepancies is the dissection by the traditional mode via the dorsal approach. Such an approach breaks the nerve layout before the dissection can reach the proximal ramification. We believe it is most likely that, previously, the intermediate branches have been regarded simply as muscular branches of the lateral branches. In addition, previous anatomists might have preferred to study the ventral branch of SN, and focused less on PRSN, thereby not paying attention to its detailed anatomy. The current study confirms that the lumbar PRSNs each form three branches. These branches are each systematically related to a muscle and to the osseous elements from which these muscles arise. The medial branches enter the multifidus muscle, which arises from the lumbar mammillary processes. The intermediate branches enter the longissimus muscle, which arises from the lumbar accessory processes. The lateral branches enter the iliocostalis, which arises from the lumbar transverse processes. By confirming the observations of Bogduk et al.,12 the current study calls for textbooks of anatomy to be updated in the way that they portray the lumbar PRSN. This anatomy does not lack clinical relevance. The variations seen in the presentation of the PRSN in textbook figures should be corrected.23,34,35
Back to Top | Article Outline
Anatomy of PRSN
Figure 5A and B shows two 3D images resulting from the digital visualization based on our dissection work. From the stem of PRSN, three branches originate. All branches pass the region behind the ipsilateral transverse process.
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Lateral Branch
The lateral branch of PRSN is related to the iliocostalis.20 After it originated from the stem of PRSN at the superior side of the ipsilateral transverse process of the lower vertebra, it goes dorsally and laterally. The branch crosses the back of the transverse process. In regard to the periphery, the branch goes to the area far lateral to the spine. The lateral branch passed through the iliocostalis and emerged through the dorsolateral edge of the muscle to become the cutaneous nerve. It is known that the cutaneous branches of the lateral branch of the first to third lumbar segments become the superior clunial nerves.
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Medial Branch
The medial branch originates from the stem of the PRSN on the superior side of the transverse process of the lower vertebra as the other two branches do. After the origin, the medial branch takes a posteromedial direction. After passing through the area posterior to the origin of the transverse process, the branch always passes on the bony floor under the mammilloaccessory ligament. Then, it delivers branches to the upper and lower facet joints before providing branches to the multifidus muscle. The mammilloaccessory ligament is a collagen-rich part of the origin of the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. The ligament covers, fixes, and protects the medial branch as a strong bundle, which contains the medial branch in a fat tissue cover. The medial branch supplies motor fibers to the multifidus muscle while it runs along the spinous process and interspinous ligament in the multifidus muscle. The extension of the main stem of the medial branch produces fine branches in the subcutaneous region to supply the cutaneous region near the midline. The close region of the skin to the midline is bilateral supply.
Back to Top | Article Outline
The Intermediate Branch
The intermediate branch originates from the stem of PRSN on the superior side of the ipsilateral transverse process as do the other two branches. After its origin, the course of the branch was always between the courses of medial and lateral branches. The intermediate branch has a long trunk between the longissimus and the iliocostalis before it reaches the skin. There, it sends a variable pattern of branches supplying a wide cutaneous area lateral to that innervated by the medial branch (fig. 5A, blue arrow).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Clinical Relevance and Radiofrequency Neurolysis of the Facet Joint Pain
The global relevance of this anatomy pertains to retraction of the back muscles during the conduct of spinal surgery. At their proximal ends, the PRSNs and their branches are fixed. Retracting the back muscles laterally to gain access to the vertebral column and its contents risks stretching these nerves, and thereby injuring them.36
A more focal clinical relevance pertains to the conduct of percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy of the medial branch.36–38 The objective of this procedure is to denervate the facet joint innervated by the targeted nerve.39 The block or neurolysis must be performed before the medial branch delivers small branches to the upper and lower facet joints. The medial branch lies consistently between the accessory and the mammillary processes in the lumbar region; the neurolytic cannula should direct to the origin of the transverse and the superior articular process. Recently, Bogduk reported how the tip of the neurolytic cannula is best positioned to perform neurolysis where the medial branch nears the mammilloaccessory ligament.39 The direction of the cannula is better set parallel to the medial branch, because the cannula denervates the tissue around the needle, not at the tip of the needle. Inserting the electrode too far from the origin of the transverse process risks capturing the intermediate branch and perhaps even the lateral branch. Coagulation of the medial branch denervates the multifidus muscles, because the medial branch supplies motor fiber to the multifidus muscle while it delivers sensory fibers to the facet joint.36 However, a clinical study found that coagulation of the medial branch produced no detectable disability.40 Despite extensive denervation of the multifidus, the patients had no symptoms and remained relieved of their back pain.41
Back to Top | Article Outline
Limitations of the Study
The study has some limitations. First, the final 3D model was a composite, with coordinate locations based on averaged coordinates from the seven cadavers. Although some uncertainties in the data occurred in individual cadavers, in general, the data from other cadavers were sufficient to support the final composite model. However, the composite model may retain some points of uncertainty. Second, the existence of the intermediate branch has been reported rather recently. The anatomy of the branch is under study on many phases. The complete depiction of the nerve requires time. In this study, our aim was not to address the anatomical importance of the connections of the third branch. Rather, we sought to establish an accurate understanding of the 3D structure to facilitate a precise approach for blockade of the medial branch of PRSN.
In conclusion, we created a three-dimensional model of the PRSN in the lumbar segments. We reconfirmed Bogduk’s report that three branches emanated from the main stem of the posterior ramus. This 3D model may be useful for planning surgical approaches to the dorsal areas of the vertebral column, and it may facilitate the success of radiofrequency neurolysis of the facet joint.
The authors thank Nikolai Bogduk, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., Professor of Pain Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; Christer Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.C.C.M., Professor of Anesthesiology and Physiology, Lund University, retired, Former President of Swedish Society in Anesthesia and Critical Care; Pierre Sprumont, M.D., Professor Emeritus at the Department of Medicine of the University of Fribourg, Secretary of the Federative International Program of Anatomical Terminologies (International Federation of Anatomical Associations); and Scott Lang, B.Sc., M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Cert.Con.Res., a Canadian anesthesiologist, for kindly reviewing our manuscript.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Corning HK Lehrbuch der topographischen Anatomie fuer Studierende und Arzte 20 u.21. Aufl. 1942 Muenchen, Bavaria JF Bergmann:817

2. Netter FH. Atlas of human anatomy. ICON Learning Systems. 2000 New Jersey Teterboro:126–397

3. Snell RS Clinical Anatomy. 20047th edition Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:940

4. Tillmann BN Atlas der Anatomie. 2005 Berlin-Heidelberg Springer-Verlag:49–285

5. Agur AMR, Dalley AF Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy. 200511th edition Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:300–28

6. Ellis H, Feldman S, Harrop-Griffiths W Anatomy for Anesthestists. 20048th edition Massachusetts Blackwell publishing:139–43

7. Gosling JA, Harris PF, Humpherson JR, Whitmore J, Willan PLT Human Anatomy. 19993rd edition London Mosby-Wolfe:1–20

8. Berry MH, Standring SM, Bannister LHBannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JF, Ferguson MWJ. Dorsal rami of the spinal nerves. Gray’s Anatomy. 199538th edition London Churchill Livingstone:1261–3

9. Newell RLMStandring S. The back. Gray’s Anatomy. 200840th edition London Churchill Livingstone:753–7

10. Lanz T, von Wachsmuth W Praktische Anatomie. Bd II, Teil 7. 1982 Rücken, Heidelberg Springer:113–230

11. Moore KL, Agur AM Essential Clinical Anatomy. 20022nd edition Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:38

12. Bogduk N, Wilson AS, Tynan W. The human lumbar dorsal rami. J Anat. 1982;134(Pt 2):383–97

13. Saito T, Yoshimoto M, Yamamoto Y, Miyaki T, Itoh M, Shimizu S, Oi Y, Schmidt W, Steinke H. The medial branch of the lateral branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28:228–34

14. Steinke H, Saito T, Miyaki T, Oi Y, Itoh M, Spanel-Borowski K. Anatomy of the human thoracolumbar Rami dorsales nervi spinalis. Ann Anat. 2009;191:408–16

15. Spalteholz W Über das Durchsichtigmachen von Menschlichen und Tierischen Praeparaten. Hirzel Publishing Co., 2011 Leipzig

16. Steinke H, Schmidt W. Die spalteholz-technik und ihre modifikationen. Anat Anz. 1991;86:306

17. Lundvall H. Die faerbung des skelettes in durchsichtigen weichteilen. Anat Anz. 1927;40:639–46

18. Dowd G. The effect of injury on the fibro-cartilaginous meniscus. The knee. 1994;1:172–3

19. Steinke H, Wolff W. A modified Spalteholz technique with preservation of the histology. Ann Anat. 2001;183:91–5

20. Nomizo A, Kudoh H, Sakai T. Iliocostalis muscles in three mammals (dolphin, goat and human): Their identification, structure and innervation. Anat Sci Int. 2005;80:212–22

21. Romanes GJ Cunningham’s Textbook of Anatomy. 197211th edition London Oxford University Press:737

22. Braus HAnatomie des Menschen. . Ein Lehrbuch fur Studierende und Arzte. Fortgefuehr von Curt Elze Zweiter Band; Eingeweide (Einschliesslich periphere Leitungsbahnen I). 1956

23. Braus H. Anatomie des Menschen. Fortgefuehr von Curt Elze. Dritten Band; Periphere Leitungsbahnen II, Centrales Nervensystem, Sinnesorgane. 1956b Berlin Springer

24. Hafferl A Lehrbuch der Topographischen Anatomie. 19572nd edition Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg Springer

25. Kaneko U Nippon Human Anatomy. 1976;vol 317th edition Tokyo, Japan Nanzando Publishing Co.,:552

26. Ogawa T, Yamada E, Yourou T Kaibougaku. 2008, pp 358–421;vol 211th edition Tokyo, Japan Kanehara Publishing Co.

27. Bertolini R, Leuter G, Rother P, Scheuner G, Wendler D Systematische Anatomie des Menschen. 4. Aufl. 1988 Berlin VEB Verlag Volk und Gesundheit

28. Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH Gray’s Anatomy. 200539th edition Edinburgh, England Churchill Livingstone Publishing Co.:1260–3

29. Bob A, Bob K Duale Reihe Anatomie. 2006 Stuttgart, Germany Thieme Verlag:1344

30. Schiebler TH, Korf HW Anatomie, Histologie, Entwickelungsgeschichte, Makroskopische u Mikroskopische Anatomie, Topographie. 2007 Heidelberg, Germany Dr Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag:900

31. Bogduk N. Proceedings: The lumbosacral dorsal rami of the monkey and dog. J Anat. 1974;118(Pt 2):393–4

32. Bogduk N. The lumbosacral dorsal rami of the cat. J Anat. 1976;122(Pt 3):653–62

33. Saito T, Iwabuchi T, Kitayama T, Sawut A, Miyaki T, Itoh M, Steinke H. Anatomy of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve of dolphin. Morphological Science (in Japanese). 2008;11:59–64

34. Pernkopf E Topographische Anatomie des Menschen. Lehrbuch und Atlas der regionaere stratigraphischen Praeparation. Band II: Bauch, Becken und Beckengliedmass. 1937 Berlin/Wien/Insbruck Urban & Schwarzenberg:821

35. Tillman B Atlas der Anatomie des Menschen. 2009 Leipig Springer-Verlag:523

36. Gossner J. The lumbar multifidus muscles are affected by medial branch interventions for facet joint syndrome: Potential problems and proposal of a pericapsular infiltration technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:E213

37. Bogduk N, Dreyfuss P, Govind J. A narrative review of lumbar medial branch neurotomy for the treatment of back pain. Pain Med. 2009;10:1035–45

38. Dobrogowski J, Wrzosek A, Wordliczek J. Radiofrequency denervation with or without addition of pentoxifylline or methylprednisolone for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Pharmacol Rep. 2005;57:475–80

39. Lau P, Mercer S, Govind J, Bogduk N. The surgical anatomy of lumbar medial branch neurotomy (facet denervation). Pain Med. 2004;5:289–98

40. Dreyfuss P, Stout A, Aprill C, Pollei S, Johnson B, Bogduk N. The significance of multifidus atrophy after successful radiofrequency neurotomy for low back pain. PM R. 2009;1:719–22

41. Manchikanti L, Manchikanti KN, Manchukonda R, Cash KA, Damron KS, Pampati V, McManus CD. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: Preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: Clinical trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician. 2007;10:425–40

© 2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share