Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2012 - Volume 117 - Issue 6 > Lactate Clearance in the Acutely Traumatized Patient
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827334c2
Editorial Views

Lactate Clearance in the Acutely Traumatized Patient

Jones, Alan E. M.D.

Free Access
Press Release
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Photo: J. P. Rathmel...
Photo: J. P. Rathmel...
Image Tools
“Thus, lactate clearance … provides more meaningful data about the overall adequacy of the resuscitative processes.”
WHEN oxygen delivery falls below a critical threshold, the anaerobic threshold, the amount of oxygen available for consumption is not able to meet the needs of cells. These imbalances result in cellular hypoxia, resulting in the failure of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and as a result energy metabolism becomes wholly dependent on anaerobic glycolysis.1 Anaerobic glycolysis sharply increases the production of cellular lactate, which diffuses into the blood during prolonged cell ischemia. Elevated circulating lactate concentration thus often indicates widespread inadequate tissue oxygenation due to inadequate oxygen delivery and/or consumption.2 In this issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY, Regnier et al.3 present a prospective cohort analysis of the utility of lactate and lactate clearance measurements in the setting of the acutely traumatized patients.
Numerous previous studies have documented the utility of lactate as a prognostic indicator in shock states.2,4 The use of lactate measurements is gaining recognition in critical care settings as a potential indicator of tissue hypoperfusion.5,6 Furthermore, lactate screening as a method of risk stratification and prognosis has been shown to be beneficial in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected infection.5,7 Underscoring the importance of these data is the fact that point-of-care testing performed at the patient’s bedside is becoming more common.8,9
There are many evidence based, data-driven, and logical arguments why lactate clearance monitoring is a superior therapeutic target than oxygen-derived variables. First, the published experimental (randomized trial) evidence supporting the use of lactate clearance as a therapeutic target is more robust in terms of the number of multicenter studies.10,11 Unlike oxygen-derived variables, the ability to clear lactate has consistently predicted better survival in published studies of resuscitation.12–15 Second, elevated lactate levels reflect the total picture of energy metabolism in the acutely stressed patient. Elevated blood lactate level has long been known to reflect anaerobic metabolism from tissue hypoxia in critically ill patients.2 However, besides these anaerobic processes, aerobic (metabolic) mechanisms that affect the host’s efficiency of energy transfer also contribute to lactate production. Cytokine-mediated glucose uptake and catecholamine-stimulated Na-K pump overactivity both can result in increased pyruvate production that eventually will overwhelm the catalytic capacity of pyruvate dehydrogenase and result in increased lactate due either to mass effect, sepsis-induced pyruvate dehydrogenase dysfunction, or both. In addition, reduced lactate clearance may reflect globally impaired metabolic function by the liver and kidney, both of which normally contribute to systemic lactate disposal through anaplerosis, a mechanism that carboxylates lactate and delivers it to the tricarboxylic acid cycle, independent of the action of pyruvate dehydrogenase.16 Thus, lactate clearance biologically reflects more of the general homeostasis of the host and provides more meaningful data about the overall adequacy of the resuscitative processes.
Lactate clearance has previously been shown to be of value in monitoring several critically ill populations including those with sepsis10,12 and cardiac arrest.17 With the present publication by Regnier et al. we now have important evidence of the utility of lactate clearance in the acutely traumatized population.3 There are several important conclusions that can be drawn from this interesting report. First, the early clearance of lactate provides additional important prognostic information beyond what is available from just single lactate measurements or severity-of-illness scores, particularly in the setting of patients who died early deaths. This additional information can assist the clinician in understanding the adequacy of the resuscitative process that has been undertaken, the severity of the potentially ongoing insult, and the physiological responses to the insult-resuscitation interaction. Second, the data clearly support the paradigm of evaluating lactate clearance early in the clinical course, underscoring the rapidity with which the body identifies and reacts to lactate production. In fact, the reported data confirm that much of the clearance will take place in the first 2 h and that there seems to be a plateau of the clearance effect at later time points (2–4 h). This is likely due to the decrease in production with resuscitation and increase in clearance resulting in flattening of the relationship as depicted in Figure 2 of the report. Third, there seems to be an important threshold for achieving a lactate clearance of 20% per hour. This level is associated with a sharp drop in mortality, particularly among subjects with initial lactate levels between 2 and 10 mM/l. Identification of this threshold is important inasmuch as it provides a numeric target for clinicians to consider as an important target to achieve. In addition, this target is similar to those reported as important thresholds in other disease states.10,11 Fourth and finally, an important finding by Regnier et al. is that among normotensive subjects, neither initial lactate or lactate clearance contributed additional prognostic value beyond what was available in standard scoring systems. This suggests that lactate may have limited value in detecting occult hypoperfusion in the acutely traumatized patient. This finding is an important distinction to the established utility of lactate for identifying occult hypoperfusion in sepsis.5,6,18
As with any report, the report by Regnier et al. has some important limitations that should be considered. First, this is an observational study and can only provide associative interactions rather than cause and effect interactions. Thus, the present observations are not adequate to change practice; however, they are important observations that could be carried forward in therapeutic experimental trials. And second, this study took place in France, which has a different organized prehospital medical care system as compared with many other regions of the world. This effect could not be controlled and thus it is not clear if this had a confounding effect on the reported results.
In conclusion, the report by Regnier et al. provides important new information suggesting that early lactate clearance in the setting of acute traumatic injury, particularly clearance rates of 20% per hour, provides important additional prognostic information beyond what is presently available from single lactate measurements and scoring systems. These observations support the continually emerging evidence that clearing lactate is always good, probably never bad and should be strongly considered as important information in the armamentarium of caring for the critically ill and injured.
Alan E. Jones, M.D.,
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi. aejones@umc.edu
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Watts JA, Kline JA. Bench to bedside: The role of mitochondrial medicine in the pathogenesis and treatment of cellular injury. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;117:985–97

2. Weil MH, Afifi AA. Experimental and clinical studies on lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock). Circulation. 1970;41:989–1001

3. Régnier MA, Raux M, Le Manach Y, Asencio Y, Gaillard J, Devilliers C, Langeron O, Riou B. Prognostic significance of blood lactate and lactate clearance in trauma patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY. 2012;117:1276–88

4. Huckabee WE. Abnormal resting blood lactate. I. The significance of hyperlactatemia in hospitalized patients. Am J Med. 1961;30:840–8

5. Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Heffner AC, Kline JA, Jones AEEmergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMSHOCKNET). . Outcomes of patients undergoing early sepsis resuscitation for cryptic shock compared with overt shock. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1289–93

6. Mikkelsen ME, Miltiades AN, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, Fuchs BD, Shah CV, Bellamy SL, Christie JD. Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1670–7

7. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, Nathanson LA, Lisbon A, Wolfe RE, Weiss JW. Serum lactate as a predictor of mortality in emergency department patients with infection. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:524–8

8. Jones AE, Kline JA. Use of goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock in academic emergency departments. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1888–9 author reply 1889–90

9. Sivayoham N. Management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department: A survey of current practice in emergency departments in England. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:422

10. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JAEmergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators. . Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2010;303:739–46

11. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, Sleeswijk Visser SJ, van der Klooster JM, Lima AP, Willemsen SP, Bakker JLACTATE study group. . Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:752–61

12. Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, Schorr C, Pope J, Casner E, Parrillo JE, Dellinger RP, Trzeciak SEmergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators. . Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis. Shock. 2009;32:35–9

13. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, Ressler JA, Tomlanovich MC. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1637–42

14. Bakker J, Coffernils M, Leon M, Gris P, Vincent JL. Blood lactate levels are superior to oxygen-derived variables in predicting outcome in human septic shock. Chest. 1991;99:956–62

15. Bakker J, Gris P, Coffernils M, Kahn RJ, Vincent JL. Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock. Am J Surg. 1996;171:221–6

16. Russell RR 3rd, Taegtmeyer H. Changes in citric acid cycle flux and anaplerosis antedate the functional decline in isolated rat hearts utilizing acetoacetate. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:384–90

17. Donnino MW, Miller J, Goyal N, Loomba M, Sankey SS, Dolcourt B, Sherwin R, Otero R, Wira C. Effective lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation. 2007;75:229–34

18. Howell MD, Donnino M, Clardy P, Talmor D, Shapiro NI. Occult hypoperfusion and mortality in patients with suspected infection. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1892–9

© 2012 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share